VRBench
Models answer multi-step reasoning questions about long narrative videos, which average 1.6 hours. The 1,010 videos come with 9,468 human-labeled question and answer pairs and 30,292 timestamped reasoning steps across seven reasoning types. Multiple-choice answers score the outcome, and a model judge scores the reasoning steps.
Sources may report the outcome score, the process score or both. 30 HF paper upvotes and about 30 GitHub stars.
- Made by
- Shanghai AI Laboratory (OpenGVLab) and collaborators
- Released
- June 2025
- Kind
- Long videos
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet #118 on the capability index
- Last model added
- June 2025
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
We present VRBench, the first long narrative video benchmark crafted for evaluating large models' multi-step reasoning capabilities, addressing limitations in existing evaluations that overlook temporal reasoning and procedural validity. It comprises 960 long videos (with an average duration of 1.6 hours), along with 8,243 human-labeled multi-step question-answering pairs and 25,106 reasoning steps with timestamps. These videos are curated via a multi-stage filtering process including expert inter-rater reviewing to prioritize plot coherence. We develop a human-AI collaborative framework that generates coherent reasoning chains, each requiring multiple temporally grounded steps, spanning seven types (e.g., event attribution, implicit inference). VRBench designs a multi-phase evaluation pipeline that assesses models at both the outcome and process levels. Apart from the MCQs for the final results, we propose a progress-level LLM-guided scoring metric to evaluate the quality of the reasoning chain from multiple dimensions comprehensively. Through extensive evaluations of 12 LLMs and 19 VLMs on VRBench, we undertake a thorough analysis and provide valuable insights that advance the field of multi-step reasoning.
Gemini-2.0-Pro (snapshot unspecified) tops the leaderboard with 74.6%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Claude 3.7 Sonnet, at 68.2%.
The newest model with a score here came out in June 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 74.6 Gemini-2.0-Pro (snapshot unspecified)
- 68.7 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified)
- 68.2 Claude 3.7 Sonnet
- 62.3
InternVL2_5-78B
- 61.8 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506
- 61.7
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
- 61.0 Gemini-2.0-Flash-Thinking (snapshot unspecified)
- 60.4
Keye-VL-8B-Preview
- 60.1 o1-preview
- 57.1 DeepSeek-R1 (snapshot unspecified)
- 56.5
Qwen2.5-VL-7B
- 56.1 DeepSeek-V3 (snapshot unspecified)
- 54.5 Aria
- 54.1 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct
- 53.5
Qwen2.5-72B
- 52.5
QwQ-32B
- 52.4 LongVA-7B-DPO
- 51.9 InternVideo2.5
- 50.8 VideoChat-Flash-7B
- 50.5 MiMo-VL-7B-RL
- 50.4
InternVL2.5-8B
- 50.1 LongVA-7B
- 49.8
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
- 48.5 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
- 48.3 Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct
- 47.8
InternLM3-8B-Instruct
- 47.1 H2OVL Mississippi-2B
- 35.9
QwQ-32B-Preview
- 31.5
DeepSeek-VL2
- 1 Gemini-2.0-Pro (snapshot unspecified) VLMs 74.6%
- 2 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) VLMs 68.7%
- 3 Claude 3.7 Sonnet VLMs 68.2%
- 4
InternVL2_5-78B VLMs 62.3%
- 5 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 VLMs 61.8%
- 6
Qwen2.5-VL-72B VLMs 61.7%
- 7 Gemini-2.0-Flash-Thinking (snapshot unspecified) LLMs 61%
- 8
Keye-VL-8B-Preview VLMs 60.4%
- 9 o1-preview LLMs 60.1%
- 10 DeepSeek-R1 (snapshot unspecified) LLMs 57.1%
- 11
Qwen2.5-VL-7B VLMs 56.5%
- 12 DeepSeek-V3 (snapshot unspecified) LLMs 56.1%
- 13 Aria VLMs 54.5%
- 14 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct VLMs 54.1%
- 15
Qwen2.5-72B LLMs 53.5%
- 16
QwQ-32B LLMs 52.5%
- 17 LongVA-7B-DPO VLMs 52.4%
- 18 InternVideo2.5 VLMs 51.9%
- 19 VideoChat-Flash-7B VLMs 50.8%
- 20 MiMo-VL-7B-RL VLMs 50.5%
- 21
InternVL2.5-8B VLMs 50.4%
- 22 LongVA-7B VLMs 50.1%
- 23
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct LLMs 49.8%
- 24 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct VLMs 48.5%
- 25 Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct LLMs 48.3%
- 26
InternLM3-8B-Instruct LLMs 47.8%
- 27 H2OVL Mississippi-2B VLMs 47.1%
- 28
QwQ-32B-Preview LLMs 35.9%
- 29
DeepSeek-VL2 VLMs 31.5%
Source: Official VRBench leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gemini-2.0-Pro (snapshot unspecified) | 74.6% | VLMs | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) | 68.7% | VLMs | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 68.2% | VLMs | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | | 62.3% | VLMs | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 | 61.8% | VLMs | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | | 61.7% | VLMs | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | Gemini-2.0-Flash-Thinking (snapshot unspecified) | 61% | LLMs | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | | 60.4% | VLMs | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | o1-preview | 60.1% | LLMs | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | DeepSeek-R1 (snapshot unspecified) | 57.1% | LLMs | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | | 56.5% | VLMs | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | DeepSeek-V3 (snapshot unspecified) | 56.1% | LLMs | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | Aria | 54.5% | VLMs | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct | 54.1% | VLMs | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | | 53.5% | LLMs | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 16 | | 52.5% | LLMs | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 17 | LongVA-7B-DPO | 52.4% | VLMs | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | InternVideo2.5 | 51.9% | VLMs | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | VideoChat-Flash-7B | 50.8% | VLMs | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | MiMo-VL-7B-RL | 50.5% | VLMs | May 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 21 | | 50.4% | VLMs | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 22 | LongVA-7B | 50.1% | VLMs | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 23 | | 49.8% | LLMs | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 24 | Phi-3.5-vision-instruct | 48.5% | VLMs | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 25 | Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct | 48.3% | LLMs | Official leaderboard | |
| 26 | | 47.8% | LLMs | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 27 | H2OVL Mississippi-2B | 47.1% | VLMs | Official leaderboard | |
| 28 | | 35.9% | LLMs | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 29 | | 31.5% | VLMs | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official VRBench leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official VRBench leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Audio and video
- Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
- LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization.
Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
- MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
- MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
- FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better.
Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
- VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules.
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%