Benchmark Almanac

VRBench

Gemini-2.0-Pro (snapshot unspecified) 74.6% tops its leaderboard Claude 3.7 Sonnet 68.2% leads the models we track
Not in model cards

Models answer multi-step reasoning questions about long narrative videos, which average 1.6 hours. The 1,010 videos come with 9,468 human-labeled question and answer pairs and 30,292 timestamped reasoning steps across seven reasoning types. Multiple-choice answers score the outcome, and a model judge scores the reasoning steps.

Sources may report the outcome score, the process score or both. 30 HF paper upvotes and about 30 GitHub stars.

Released
June 2025
Kind
Long videos
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Multiple choice
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Claude 3.7 Sonnet #118 on the capability index
Last model added
June 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

We present VRBench, the first long narrative video benchmark crafted for evaluating large models' multi-step reasoning capabilities, addressing limitations in existing evaluations that overlook temporal reasoning and procedural validity. It comprises 960 long videos (with an average duration of 1.6 hours), along with 8,243 human-labeled multi-step question-answering pairs and 25,106 reasoning steps with timestamps. These videos are curated via a multi-stage filtering process including expert inter-rater reviewing to prioritize plot coherence. We develop a human-AI collaborative framework that generates coherent reasoning chains, each requiring multiple temporally grounded steps, spanning seven types (e.g., event attribution, implicit inference). VRBench designs a multi-phase evaluation pipeline that assesses models at both the outcome and process levels. Apart from the MCQs for the final results, we propose a progress-level LLM-guided scoring metric to evaluate the quality of the reasoning chain from multiple dimensions comprehensively. Through extensive evaluations of 12 LLMs and 19 VLMs on VRBench, we undertake a thorough analysis and provide valuable insights that advance the field of multi-step reasoning.

Abstract of VRBench: A Benchmark for Multi-Step Reasoning in Long Narrative Videos (arXiv:2506.10857, CC0)
29
Entries on its own leaderboard, 19 models we track

Gemini-2.0-Pro (snapshot unspecified) tops the leaderboard with 74.6%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Claude 3.7 Sonnet, at 68.2%.

The newest model with a score here came out in June 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Gemini-2.0-Pro (snapshot unspecified) VLMs 74.6%
  2. 2 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) VLMs 68.7%
  3. 3 Claude 3.7 Sonnet VLMs 68.2%
  4. 4 InternVL2_5-78B VLMs 62.3%
  5. 5 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 VLMs 61.8%
  6. 6 Qwen2.5-VL-72B VLMs 61.7%
  7. 7 Gemini-2.0-Flash-Thinking (snapshot unspecified) LLMs 61%
  8. 8 Keye-VL-8B-Preview VLMs 60.4%
  9. 9 o1-preview LLMs 60.1%
  10. 10 DeepSeek-R1 (snapshot unspecified) LLMs 57.1%
  11. 11 Qwen2.5-VL-7B VLMs 56.5%
  12. 12 DeepSeek-V3 (snapshot unspecified) LLMs 56.1%
  13. 13 Aria VLMs 54.5%
  14. 14 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct VLMs 54.1%
  15. 15 Qwen2.5-72B LLMs 53.5%
  16. 16 QwQ-32B LLMs 52.5%
  17. 17 LongVA-7B-DPO VLMs 52.4%
  18. 18 InternVideo2.5 VLMs 51.9%
  19. 19 VideoChat-Flash-7B VLMs 50.8%
  20. 20 MiMo-VL-7B-RL VLMs 50.5%
  21. 21 InternVL2.5-8B VLMs 50.4%
  22. 22 LongVA-7B VLMs 50.1%
  23. 23 Llama 3.3 70B Instruct LLMs 49.8%
  24. 24 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct VLMs 48.5%
  25. 25 Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct LLMs 48.3%
  26. 26 InternLM3-8B-Instruct LLMs 47.8%
  27. 27 H2OVL Mississippi-2B VLMs 47.1%
  28. 28 QwQ-32B-Preview LLMs 35.9%
  29. 29 DeepSeek-VL2 VLMs 31.5%

Source: Official VRBench leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini-2.0-Pro (snapshot unspecified) 74.6% VLMs Official leaderboard
2 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 68.7% VLMs Official leaderboard
3 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 68.2% VLMs Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
4 InternVL2_5-78B 62.3% VLMs Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
5 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 61.8% VLMs Jun 2025 Official leaderboard
6 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 61.7% VLMs Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
7 Gemini-2.0-Flash-Thinking (snapshot unspecified) 61% LLMs Official leaderboard
8 Keye-VL-8B-Preview 60.4% VLMs Jun 2025 Official leaderboard
9 o1-preview 60.1% LLMs Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
10 DeepSeek-R1 (snapshot unspecified) 57.1% LLMs Official leaderboard
11 Qwen2.5-VL-7B 56.5% VLMs Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
12 DeepSeek-V3 (snapshot unspecified) 56.1% LLMs Official leaderboard
13 Aria 54.5% VLMs Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
14 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct 54.1% VLMs Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
15 Qwen2.5-72B 53.5% LLMs Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
16 QwQ-32B 52.5% LLMs Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
17 LongVA-7B-DPO 52.4% VLMs Official leaderboard
18 InternVideo2.5 51.9% VLMs Official leaderboard
19 VideoChat-Flash-7B 50.8% VLMs Official leaderboard
20 MiMo-VL-7B-RL 50.5% VLMs May 2025 Official leaderboard
21 InternVL2.5-8B 50.4% VLMs Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
22 LongVA-7B 50.1% VLMs Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
23 Llama 3.3 70B Instruct 49.8% LLMs Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
24 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct 48.5% VLMs Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
25 Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct 48.3% LLMs Official leaderboard
26 InternLM3-8B-Instruct 47.8% LLMs Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
27 H2OVL Mississippi-2B 47.1% VLMs Official leaderboard
28 QwQ-32B-Preview 35.9% LLMs Nov 2024 Official leaderboard
29 DeepSeek-VL2 31.5% VLMs Dec 2024 Official leaderboard

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Anthropic
Own leaderboard Not tested since Jun 2025

Source: Official VRBench leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude 3.7 Sonnet InternVL2_5-78B Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude 3.7 Sonnet o1-preview

Source: Official VRBench leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Audio and video

All 232 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better. Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%