Benchmark Almanac

Video-MMMU

Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7% leads since Aug 2026 In use

300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy.

Frame sampling differs across labs.

In the authors’ words

Humans acquire knowledge through three cognitive stages: perceiving information, comprehending knowledge, and adapting knowledge to solve novel problems. Videos serve as an effective medium for this learning process, facilitating a progression through these cognitive stages. However, existing video benchmarks fail to systematically evaluate the knowledge acquisition capabilities in Large Multimodal Models (LMMs). To address this gap, we introduce Video-MMMU, a multi-modal, multi-disciplinary benchmark designed to assess LMMs' ability to acquire and utilize knowledge from videos. Video-MMMU features a curated collection of 300 expert-level videos and 900 human-annotated questions across six disciplines, evaluating knowledge acquisition through stage-aligned question-answer pairs: Perception, Comprehension, and Adaptation. A proposed knowledge gain metric, Δknowledge, quantifies improvement in performance after video viewing. Evaluation of LMMs reveals a steep decline in performance as cognitive demands increase and highlights a significant gap between human and model knowledge acquisition, underscoring the need for methods to enhance LMMs' capability to learn and adapt from videos.

Abstract of Video-MMMU: Evaluating Knowledge Acquisition from Multi-Discipline Professional Videos (arXiv:2501.13826, CC0)
Made by NTU S-Lab (LMMs-Lab) Released Jan 2025 Video understanding All tasks public Last in a launch post Aug 2026 Last model added Aug 2026 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
University Undergraduates and entry-level professionals
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Multiple choice
30
Models scored in lab cards
27
Launch posts list it, from 10 labs
16
System cards report it, from 8 labs

Qwen 3.8 Max leads with 88.7% among models released by Aug 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Aug 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  2. 2 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 88.3%
  3. 3 Gemini 3 Pro 87.6%
  4. 4 Gemini 3 Flash 86.9%
  5. 5 Seed2.0 Pro 86.9%
  6. 6 Kimi K2.5 86.6%
  7. 7 Qwen3.7-Plus 85.4%
  8. 8 Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite 84.8%
  9. 9 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 84.7%
  10. 10 GPT-5 84.6%
  11. 11 MiniMax-M3 84.6%
  12. 12 Qwen3.6 27B 84.4%
  13. 13 Qwen 3.6 Plus 84%
  14. 14 Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 83.7%
  15. 15 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 83.6%
  16. 16 Seed1.8 82.7%
  17. 17 GPT-5 mini 82.5%
  18. 18 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 82%
  19. 19 Seed1.5-VL 81.4%
  20. 20 ERNIE 5.0 81.1%
  21. 21 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 80%
  22. 22 Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B 80%
  23. 23 Gemini 2.5 Flash Jun 2025 79.2%
  24. 24 GLM-4.6V 74.7%
  25. 25 GLM-4.5V 72.4%
  26. 26 LongCat-Flash-Omni 67.5%
  27. 27 GPT-5 nano 66.8%
  28. 28 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 65.2%
  29. 29 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 61%
  30. 30 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 60.2%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7% Aug 2026 Model card
2 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 88.3% Apr 2026 Model card
3 Gemini 3 Pro 87.6% Nov 2025 Model card
4 Gemini 3 Flash 86.9% Dec 2025 Model card
5 Seed2.0 Pro 86.9% Feb 2026 Model card
6 Kimi K2.5 86.6% Jan 2026 Model card
7 Qwen3.7-Plus 85.4% Jun 2026 Model card
8 Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite 84.8% Mar 2026 Model card
9 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 84.7% Feb 2026 Model card
10 GPT-5 84.6% Aug 2025 Model card
11 MiniMax-M3 84.6% Jun 2026 Model card
12 Qwen3.6 27B 84.4% Apr 2026 Model card
13 Qwen 3.6 Plus 84% Apr 2026 Model card
14 Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 83.7% Apr 2026 Model card
15 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 83.6% Jun 2025 Model card
16 Seed1.8 82.7% Dec 2025 Model card
17 GPT-5 mini 82.5% Aug 2025 Model card
18 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 82% Feb 2026 Model card
19 Seed1.5-VL 81.4% May 2025 Model card
20 ERNIE 5.0 81.1% Feb 2026 Model card
21 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 80% Sep 2025 Model card
22 Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B 80% May 2026 Model card
23 Gemini 2.5 Flash Jun 2025 79.2% Jul 2025 Model card
24 GLM-4.6V 74.7% Dec 2025 Model card
25 GLM-4.5V 72.4% Aug 2025 Model card
26 LongCat-Flash-Omni 67.5% Oct 2025 Model card
27 GPT-5 nano 66.8% Aug 2025 Model card
28 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 65.2% Jun 2025 Model card
29 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 61% Jul 2025 Model card
30 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 60.2% Feb 2025 Model card

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 27 entries, 23 of them models we track. We plot every source in the charts below.

4 models have held number one since its release in Jan 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

Anthropic OpenAI Google DeepMind Qwen ByteDance Seed
Own leaderboard Not tested since Aug 2025
GPT-5 84.6%
Lab claims Passed 85% in Nov 2025, by Gemini 3 Pro
Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%

The best score passed 85% in Nov 2025

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen 3.8 Max Gemini 3 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) GPT-4o VideoLLAMA3-7B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen 3.8 Max Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024)

2 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

ByteDance Seed
Google DeepMind
Moonshot AI
Z.ai
OpenAI
Qwen
Meituan
Baidu
Kuaishou
MiniMax
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
3 Aug 2026 Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7 VideoMMMU
1 Jun 2026 Qwen3.7-Plus 85.4 VideoMMMU
1 Jun 2026 MiniMax-M3 84.6 Video-MMMU
25 May 2026 Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B 80 VideoMMMU
28 Apr 2026 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 88.3 VideoMMMU
22 Apr 2026 Qwen3.6 27B 84.4 VideoMMMU
15 Apr 2026 Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 83.7 VideoMMMU
2 Apr 2026 Qwen 3.6 Plus 84 VideoMMMU
3 Mar 2026 Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite 84.8 Video-MMMU
24 Feb 2026 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 82 VideoMMMU
16 Feb 2026 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 84.7 VideoMMMU
6 Feb 2026 ERNIE 5.0 81.1 Video-MMMU
27 Jan 2026 Kimi K2.5 86.6 VideoMMMU
18 Dec 2025 Seed1.8 82.7 VideoMMMU
17 Dec 2025 Gemini 3 Flash 86.9 Video-MMMU
8 Dec 2025 GLM-4.6V 74.7 VideoMMMU
18 Nov 2025 Gemini 3 Pro 87.6 Video-MMMU
31 Oct 2025 LongCat-Flash-Omni 67.5 Video-MMMU
23 Sep 2025 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 80 VideoMMMU
11 Aug 2025 GLM-4.5V 72.4 VideoMMMU
7 Aug 2025 GPT-5 nano 66.8 VideoMMMU, max frame 256
7 Aug 2025 GPT-5 mini 82.5 VideoMMMU, max frame 256
7 Aug 2025 GPT-5 84.6 VideoMMMU Video-based multimodal reasoning (max frame 256)
1 Jul 2025 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 61 VideoMMMU
21 Jun 2025 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 65.2 VideoMMMU (Pass@1)
17 Jun 2025 Gemini 2.5 Pro 83.6 VideoMMMU
12 May 2025 Seed1.5-VL 81.4 Video-MMMU

16 system cards report it, from 8 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
9 Jun 2026 Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B technical report 80 Video-MMMU (Table 2) Capabilities
21 Mar 2026 Seed1.8 model card 82.7 VideoMMMU (Table 3) Capabilities
3 Mar 2026 Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite model card 84.8 Video-MMMU (results table, p.4) Capabilities
14 Feb 2026 Seed2.0 Pro model card 86.9 VideoMMMU (Table 9) Capabilities
4 Feb 2026 ERNIE 5.0 technical report 81.1 Video-MMMU (Table 3) Capabilities
30 Jan 2026 Kimi K2.5 technical report 86.6 VideoMMMU (Table 4) Capabilities
1 Jan 2026 GLM-4.6V technical report 74.7 VideoMMMU, GLM-4.6V thinking (Table 2) Capabilities
26 Nov 2025 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B technical report 80 VideoMMMU (Table 2) Capabilities
31 Oct 2025 LongCat-Flash-Omni technical report 67.5 Video-MMMU (Table 6) Capabilities
13 Aug 2025 GLM-4.5V technical report 72.4 VideoMMMU, GLM-4.5V thinking (Table 2) Capabilities
7 Jul 2025 Gemini 2.5 Pro technical report 83.6 VideoMMMU, test, 0-shot (Table 6) Capabilities
7 Jul 2025 Gemini 2.5 Flash technical report 79.2 VideoMMMU, test, 0-shot (Table 6) Capabilities
1 Jul 2025 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking technical report 61 VideoMMMU, GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking thinking (Table 2) Capabilities
23 Jun 2025 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 technical report 65.2 VideoMMMU (Pass@1) (Table 4) Capabilities
11 May 2025 Seed1.5-VL technical report 81.4 Video-MMMU, thinking (Table 7). Non-thinking 72.1 Capabilities
19 Feb 2025 Qwen2.5-VL-72B technical report 60.2 Video-MMMU (Table 8) Capabilities

More in Audio and video

All 168 in Audio and video
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%
  • TVBench In use Models answer multiple-choice questions on 10 temporal video tasks, such as action counting and ordering, that static frames cannot solve. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 81.9%
  • VideoMME v2 (with subtitles) In use Models answer multiple choice questions about videos with subtitles or audio added. Related questions are scored as groups to penalize guessing. Qwen 3.8 Max 68.3%