Benchmark Almanac

LVBench

Gemini 4 Argon 91.7% leads since Oct 2026 In use

Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization.

Frame budgets differ by provider API, which complicates comparisons.

In the authors’ words

Recent progress in multimodal large language models has markedly enhanced the understanding of short videos (typically under one minute), and several evaluation datasets have emerged accordingly. However, these advancements fall short of meeting the demands of real-world applications such as embodied intelligence for long-term decision-making, in-depth movie reviews and discussions, and live sports commentary, all of which require comprehension of long videos spanning several hours. To address this gap, we introduce LVBench, a benchmark specifically designed for long video understanding. Our dataset comprises publicly sourced videos and encompasses a diverse set of tasks aimed at long video comprehension and information extraction. LVBench is designed to challenge multimodal models to demonstrate long-term memory and extended comprehension capabilities. Our extensive evaluations reveal that current multimodal models still underperform on these demanding long video understanding tasks. Through LVBench, we aim to spur the development of more advanced models capable of tackling the complexities of long video comprehension. Our data and code are publicly available at: https://lvbench.github.io.

Abstract of LVBench: An Extreme Long Video Understanding Benchmark (arXiv:2406.08035, CC0)
Made by Zhipu AI / Tsinghua Released Jun 2024 Long videos All tasks public Last in a launch post Oct 2026 Last model added Oct 2026 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Multiple choice
25
Models scored in lab cards
23
Launch posts list it, from 5 labs
18
System cards report it, from 5 labs

Gemini 4 Argon leads with 91.7%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  2. 2 Gemini 3.8 Flash 87.8%
  3. 3 Gemini 3.7 Flash 85.4%
  4. 4 Qwen 3.8 Max 81.8%
  5. 5 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 78.7%
  6. 6 Seed2.1 Pro 78%
  7. 7 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 76.9%
  8. 8 Qwen3.8 Flash 76.6%
  9. 9 Seed2.0 Pro 76.4%
  10. 10 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 76.4%
  11. 11 Qwen3.7-Plus 76.2%
  12. 12 Kimi K2.5 75.9%
  13. 13 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 75.5%
  14. 14 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 74.4%
  15. 15 Seed1.8 73%
  16. 16 Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 71.4%
  17. 17 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 71.2%
  18. 18 Seed1.5-VL 64.6%
  19. 19 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 63.6%
  20. 20 Gemini 2.5 Flash Jun 2025 62.7%
  21. 21 GLM-4.6V 59.5%
  22. 22 GLM-4.5V 53.8%
  23. 23 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 50.2%
  24. 24 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 47.3%
  25. 25 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 45.1%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini 4 Argon 91.7% Oct 2026 Model card
2 Gemini 3.8 Flash 87.8% Sep 2026 Model card
3 Gemini 3.7 Flash 85.4% Aug 2026 Model card
4 Qwen 3.8 Max 81.8% Aug 2026 Model card
5 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 78.7% Jul 2025 Model card
6 Seed2.1 Pro 78% Jun 2026 Model card
7 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 76.9% Sep 2026 Model card
8 Qwen3.8 Flash 76.6% Aug 2026 Model card
9 Seed2.0 Pro 76.4% Feb 2026 Model card
10 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 76.4% Apr 2026 Model card
11 Qwen3.7-Plus 76.2% Jun 2026 Model card
12 Kimi K2.5 75.9% Jan 2026 Model card
13 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 75.5% Feb 2026 Model card
14 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 74.4% Feb 2026 Model card
15 Seed1.8 73% Dec 2025 Model card
16 Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 71.4% Apr 2026 Model card
17 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 71.2% Mar 2026 Model card
18 Seed1.5-VL 64.6% May 2025 Model card
19 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 63.6% Sep 2025 Model card
20 Gemini 2.5 Flash Jun 2025 62.7% Jul 2025 Model card
21 GLM-4.6V 59.5% Dec 2025 Model card
22 GLM-4.5V 53.8% Aug 2025 Model card
23 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 50.2% Sep 2025 Model card
24 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 47.3% Jan 2025 Model card
25 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 45.1% Jul 2025 Model card

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 21 entries, 9 of them models we track. We plot every source in the charts below.

5 models have held number one since its release in Jun 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

Google DeepMind Shanghai AI Lab Alibaba Group OpenAI ByteDance Seed Qwen
Own leaderboard Not tested since May 2025
Seed1.5-VL 64.6%
Lab claims Passed 85% in Aug 2026, by Gemini 3.7 Flash

The best score passed 85% in Aug 2026

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Gemini 4 Argon Gemini 3.7 Flash Gemini 2.5 Pro Seed1.5-VL GPT-4o mPLUG-Owl3-7B Gemini 1.5 Pro 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Gemini 4 Argon Gemini 3.7 Flash

3 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Qwen
ByteDance Seed
Z.ai
Moonshot AI
Google DeepMind
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
13 Oct 2026 Gemini 4 Argon 91.7 LVBench
18 Sep 2026 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 76.9 LVBench
2 Sep 2026 Gemini 3.8 Flash 87.8 LVBench (agentic; static = 87.1%)
26 Aug 2026 Qwen3.8 Flash 76.6 Long video understanding LVBench
13 Aug 2026 Gemini 3.7 Flash 85.4 LVBench
3 Aug 2026 Qwen 3.8 Max 81.8 LVBench
23 Jun 2026 Seed2.1 Pro 78 LVBench
1 Jun 2026 Qwen3.7-Plus 76.2 LVBench
28 Apr 2026 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 76.4 LVBench
15 Apr 2026 Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 71.4 LVBench
30 Mar 2026 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 71.2 LVBench
24 Feb 2026 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 74.4 LVBench
16 Feb 2026 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 75.5 LVBench
14 Feb 2026 Seed2.0 Pro 76.4 LVBench (without VideoCut, 80.0 with)
27 Jan 2026 Kimi K2.5 75.9 LVBench
18 Dec 2025 Seed1.8 73 LVBench
8 Dec 2025 GLM-4.6V 59.5 LVBench
23 Sep 2025 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 63.6 LVBench
22 Sep 2025 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 50.2 LVBench
11 Aug 2025 GLM-4.5V 53.8 LVBench
1 Jul 2025 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 45.1 LVBench
12 May 2025 Seed1.5-VL 64.6 LVBench
28 Jan 2025 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 47.3 LVBench

18 system cards report it, from 5 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
13 Oct 2026 Gemini 4 Argon model card 91.7 LVBench (results table, p.5) Capabilities
22 Sep 2026 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash technical report 76.9 LVBench (Table 3) Capabilities
2 Sep 2026 Gemini 3.8 Flash model card 87.8 LVBench, agentic (results table, p.5). Static = 87.1% Capabilities
13 Aug 2026 Gemini 3.7 Flash model card 85.4 LVBench (results table, p.5) Capabilities
23 Jun 2026 Seed2.1 Pro model card 78 LVBench (Table 10) Capabilities
17 Apr 2026 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus technical report 71.2 LVBench (Table 6) Capabilities
21 Mar 2026 Seed1.8 model card 73 LVBench (Table 3). 78.9 with the VideoCut tool (Table 6) Capabilities
14 Feb 2026 Seed2.0 Pro model card 76.4 LVBench (Table 9). 80.0 with the VideoCut tool (Table 10) Capabilities
30 Jan 2026 Kimi K2.5 technical report 75.9 LVBench (Table 4) Capabilities
1 Jan 2026 GLM-4.6V technical report 59.5 LVBench, GLM-4.6V thinking (Table 2) Capabilities
26 Nov 2025 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B technical report 63.6 LVBench (Table 2) Capabilities
22 Sep 2025 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B technical report 50.2 LVBench, Instruct (Table 9). Thinking 49.0 (Table 10) Capabilities
13 Aug 2025 GLM-4.5V technical report 53.8 LVBench, GLM-4.5V thinking (Table 2) Capabilities
7 Jul 2025 Gemini 2.5 Pro technical report 78.7 LVBench, test, 0-shot (Table 6) Capabilities
7 Jul 2025 Gemini 2.5 Flash technical report 62.7 LVBench, test, 0-shot (Table 6) Capabilities
1 Jul 2025 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking technical report 44 LVBench, GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking thinking (Table 2). Table 3 prints 45.1 Capabilities
11 May 2025 Seed1.5-VL technical report 64.6 LVBench, thinking (Table 7). Non-thinking 64.0 Capabilities
19 Feb 2025 Qwen2.5-VL-72B technical report 47.3 LVBench (Table 8) Capabilities

More in Audio and video

All 168 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%
  • TVBench In use Models answer multiple-choice questions on 10 temporal video tasks, such as action counting and ordering, that static frames cannot solve. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 81.9%
  • VideoMME v2 (with subtitles) In use Models answer multiple choice questions about videos with subtitles or audio added. Related questions are scored as groups to penalize guessing. Qwen 3.8 Max 68.3%