Benchmark Almanac

VoiceBench

Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1% leads since Mar 2026 In use

Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules.

The suite grew after release: mmsu joined the leaderboard in 2024-12, and bbh and wildvoice in 2025-04. The Overall score now averages nine subsets, so early Overall scores are not comparable.

In the authors’ words

Building on the success of large language models (LLMs), recent advancements such as GPT-4o have enabled real-time speech interactions through LLM-based voice assistants, offering a significantly improved user experience compared to traditional text-based interactions. However, the absence of benchmarks designed to evaluate these speech interaction capabilities has hindered progress of LLM-based voice assistants development. Current evaluations focus primarily on automatic speech recognition (ASR) or general knowledge evaluation with clean speeches, neglecting the more intricate, real-world scenarios that involve diverse speaker characteristics, environmental and content factors. To address this, we introduce VoiceBench, the first benchmark designed to provide a multi-faceted evaluation of LLM-based voice assistants. VoiceBench also includes both real and synthetic spoken instructions that incorporate the above three key real-world variations. Extensive experiments reveal the limitations of current LLM-based voice assistant models and offer valuable insights for future research and development in this field.

Abstract of VoiceBench: Benchmarking LLM-Based Voice Assistants (arXiv:2410.17196, CC0)
Made by CUHK-Shenzhen Released Oct 2024 Audio understanding and voice All tasks public Last in a launch post Sep 2026 Last model added Oct 2026 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Graded by a model A language model scores each response, usually against a rubric.
Answers
Open-ended Free-form text, documents, designs or media judged as a whole.
10
Models scored in lab cards
9
Launch posts list it, from 5 labs
12
System cards report it, from 7 labs

Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus leads with 93.1%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%
  2. 2 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 91.6%
  3. 3 Inkling 91.4%
  4. 4 Inkling-Small 90.1%
  5. 5 Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B 89.4%
  6. 6 LongCat-Flash-Omni 88.7%
  7. 7 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 85.5%
  8. 8 Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 80.3%
  9. 9 Kimi-Audio-7B-Instruct 76.9%
  10. 10 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 74.1%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1% Mar 2026 Model card
2 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 91.6% Sep 2026 Model card
3 Inkling 91.4% Jul 2026 Model card
4 Inkling-Small 90.1% Jul 2026 Model card
5 Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B 89.4% Apr 2026 Model card
6 LongCat-Flash-Omni 88.7% Oct 2025 Model card
7 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 85.5% Sep 2025 Model card
8 Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 80.3% Oct 2026 Model card
9 Kimi-Audio-7B-Instruct 76.9% Apr 2025 Model card
10 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 74.1% Mar 2025 Model card

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 41 entries, 15 of them models we track. We plot every source in the charts below.

8 models have held number one since its release in Oct 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

Qwen Z.ai Fixie.ai (Ultravox) Moonshot AI NVIDIA Meituan
Own leaderboard Passed 85% in Sep 2025, by Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B
Lab claims Passed 85% in Sep 2025, by Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B

The best score passed 85% in Sep 2025

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B Ultravox v0.6 Llama 3.3 70B Kimi-Audio-7B-Instruct Ultravox v0.4.1 Llama 3.1 8B GLM-4-Voice-9B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus Ultravox v0.6 Llama 3.3 70B

2 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Qwen
Moonshot AI
Meituan
NVIDIA
Thinking Machines
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
18 Sep 2026 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 91.6 VoiceBench Audio Interaction
30 Jul 2026 Inkling-Small 90.1 VoiceBench
15 Jul 2026 Inkling 91.4 VoiceBench
28 Apr 2026 Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B 89.4 Voice interaction (Speech Instruction Following)
30 Mar 2026 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1 VoiceBench
31 Oct 2025 LongCat-Flash-Omni 88.7 Mean of VoiceBench AlpacaEval 4.94 / CommonEval 4.32 (GPT scores x20) / OpenBookQA 93.41 / SDQA 82.46 / MMSU 81.95 / AdvBench 100 / IFEval 77.99, computed by the almanac
22 Sep 2025 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 85.5 VoiceBench Overall
25 Apr 2025 Kimi-Audio-7B-Instruct 76.9 VoiceBench Avg (AlpacaEval 4.46, CommonEval 3.97, SD-QA 63.12, MMSU 62.17, OpenBookQA 83.52, IFEval 61.10, AdvBench 100.00)
27 Mar 2025 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 74.1 VoiceBench Avg

12 system cards report it, from 7 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
23 Oct 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B technical report 80.3 Voicebench, reasoning, 72.60 non-reasoning (Table 8) Capabilities
22 Sep 2026 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash technical report 91.6 VoiceBench (Table 4) Capabilities
30 Jul 2026 Inkling-Small model card 90.1 VoiceBench (5. Evaluations table) Capabilities
15 Jul 2026 Inkling model card 91.4 VoiceBench (5. Evaluations table, effort 0.99) Capabilities
27 Apr 2026 Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B technical report 89.4 VoiceBench Avg, reasoning on (Table 8). Nine spoken subsets from 71.4 (SD-QA) to 100 (AdvBench) Capabilities
17 Apr 2026 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus technical report 93.1 VoiceBench (Table 5) Capabilities
4 Feb 2026 ERNIE 5.0 technical report VoiceBench AlpacaEval 4.62, CommonEval 3.74, SD-QA 77.58, MMSU 84.68, OpenBookQA 92.97, IFEval 72.67, AdvBench 99.23, no overall score (Table 7) Capabilities
31 Oct 2025 LongCat-Flash-Omni technical report VoiceBench AlpacaEval 4.94, CommonEval 4.32, OpenBookQA 93.41, SDQA 82.46, MMSU 81.95, AdvBench 100, IFEval 77.99, no overall score (Table 11) Capabilities
22 Sep 2025 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B technical report 85.5 VoiceBench Overall, Instruct (Table 7). Thinking 88.8 Capabilities
17 Jul 2025 Voxtral Small technical report Openbook QA (Chen et al., 2024, the VoiceBench subset) 88.4, no overall VoiceBench score (Table 8) Capabilities
25 Apr 2025 Kimi-Audio-7B-Instruct technical report 76.9 VoiceBench Avg (Table 6). AlpacaEval 4.46, CommonEval 3.97, SD-QA 63.12, MMSU 62.17, OpenBookQA 83.52, IFEval 61.10, AdvBench 100.00 Capabilities
26 Mar 2025 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B technical report 74.1 VoiceBench Avg (Table 3). AlpacaEval 4.49, CommonEval 3.93, SD-QA 55.71, MMSU 61.32, OpenBookQA 81.10, IFEval 52.87, AdvBench 99.42 Capabilities

More in Audio and video

All 168 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • TVBench In use Models answer multiple-choice questions on 10 temporal video tasks, such as action counting and ordering, that static frames cannot solve. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 81.9%
  • VideoMME v2 (with subtitles) In use Models answer multiple choice questions about videos with subtitles or audio added. Related questions are scored as groups to penalize guessing. Qwen 3.8 Max 68.3%