MLVU
Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy.
The dev set and the test set use different questions and option counts, so their scores are not comparable. The test answers became public on 2025-03-18.
In the authors’ words
The evaluation of Long Video Understanding (LVU) performance poses an important but challenging research problem. Despite previous efforts, the existing video understanding benchmarks are severely constrained by several issues, especially the insufficient lengths of videos, a lack of diversity in video types and evaluation tasks, and the inappropriateness for evaluating LVU performances. To address the above problems, we propose a new benchmark called MLVU (Multi-task Long Video Understanding Benchmark) for the comprehensive and in-depth evaluation of LVU. MLVU presents the following critical values: 1) The substantial and flexible extension of video lengths, which enables the benchmark to evaluate LVU performance across a wide range of durations. 2) The inclusion of various video genres, e.g., movies, surveillance footage, egocentric videos, cartoons, game videos, etc., which reflects the models' LVU performances in different scenarios. 3) The development of diversified evaluation tasks, which enables a comprehensive examination of MLLMs' key abilities in long-video understanding. The empirical study with 23 latest MLLMs reveals significant room for improvement in today's technique, as all existing methods struggle with most of the evaluation tasks and exhibit severe performance degradation when handling longer videos. Additionally, it suggests that factors such as context length, image-understanding ability, and the choice of LLM backbone can play critical roles in future advancements. We anticipate that MLVU will advance the research of long video understanding by providing a comprehensive and in-depth analysis of MLLMs.
- Level
- Everyday Most adults, without training
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Multiple choice
Qwen 3.8 Max leads with 90.8% among models released by Aug 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
The newest model with a score here came out in Aug 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 16 more
- 90.8
Qwen 3.8 Max
- 87.4
Qwen3.7-Plus
- 87.3
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- 86.8
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus
- 86.7
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
- 86.7
Qwen 3.6 Plus
- 86.6
Qwen3.6 27B
- 86.2
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B
- 83.8
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B
- 82.8
Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B
- 82.1
Seed1.5-VL
- 78.2
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B
- 75.2
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B
- 74.6
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
- 74.3 Reka Edge
- 73.6
Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL
- 1
Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
- 2
Qwen3.7-Plus 87.4%
- 3
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 87.3%
- 4
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 86.8%
- 5
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 86.7%
- 6
Qwen 3.6 Plus 86.7%
- 7
Qwen3.6 27B 86.6%
- 8
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 86.2%
- 9
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 83.8%
- 10
Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B 82.8%
- 11
Seed1.5-VL 82.1%
- 12
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 78.2%
- 13
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 75.2%
- 14
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 74.6%
- 15 Reka Edge 74.3%
- 16
Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL 73.6%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 90.8% | Aug 2026 | Model card | |
| 2 | | 87.4% | Jun 2026 | Model card | |
| 3 | | 87.3% | Feb 2026 | Model card | |
| 4 | | 86.8% | Mar 2026 | Model card | |
| 5 | | 86.7% | Feb 2026 | Model card | |
| 6 | | 86.7% | Apr 2026 | Model card | |
| 7 | | 86.6% | Apr 2026 | Model card | |
| 8 | | 86.2% | Apr 2026 | Model card | |
| 9 | | 83.8% | Sep 2025 | Model card | |
| 10 | | 82.8% | May 2026 | Model card | |
| 11 | | 82.1% | May 2025 | Model card | |
| 12 | | 78.2% | Aug 2025 | Model card | |
| 13 | | 75.2% | Sep 2025 | Model card | |
| 14 | | 74.6% | Jan 2025 | Model card | |
| 15 | Reka Edge | 74.3% | Mar 2026 | Model card | |
| 16 | | 73.6% | Nov 2025 | Model card |
7 models have held number one since its release in Jun 2024
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
The best score passed 85% in Feb 2026
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 Aug 2026 | 90.8 | MLVU (M-Avg) | |
| 1 Jun 2026 | 87.4 | MLVU (M-Avg) | |
| 25 May 2026 | 82.8 | MLVU | |
| 22 Apr 2026 | 86.6 | MLVU | |
| 15 Apr 2026 | 86.2 | MLVU | |
| 2 Apr 2026 | 86.7 | MLVU (M-Avg) | |
| 30 Mar 2026 | 86.8 | MLVU(M-Avg) | |
| 11 Mar 2026 | Reka Edge | 74.3 | MLVU |
| 24 Feb 2026 | 87.3 | MLVU | |
| 16 Feb 2026 | 86.7 | MLVU (M-Avg) | |
| 23 Sep 2025 | 83.8 | MLVU | |
| 22 Sep 2025 | 75.2 | MLVU | |
| 25 Aug 2025 | 78.2 | MLVU | |
| 12 May 2025 | 82.1 | MLVU | |
| 28 Jan 2025 | 74.6 | MLVU_M-Avg_dev |
8 system cards report it, from 5 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 Jun 2026 | | 82.8 | MLVU (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 17 Apr 2026 | | 86.8 | MLVU (M-Avg) (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| 26 Nov 2025 | | 83.8 | MLVU M-Avg (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 6 Nov 2025 | | 73.6 | MLVU (M-Avg), reasoning off only (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| 22 Sep 2025 | | 75.2 | MLVU, Instruct (Table 9). Thinking 72.9 (Table 10) | Capabilities |
| 25 Aug 2025 | | 78.2 | MLVU (M-Avg) (Table 2, Table 9) | Capabilities |
| 11 May 2025 | | 82.1 | MLVU, thinking (Table 7). Non-thinking 81.8 | Capabilities |
| 19 Feb 2025 | | 74.6 | MLVU M-Avg (Table 8) | Capabilities |
More in Audio and video
- Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
- LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization.
Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
- MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
- VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules.
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%
- TVBench In use Models answer multiple-choice questions on 10 temporal video tasks, such as action counting and ordering, that static frames cannot solve. Scored by accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 81.9%
- VideoMME v2 (with subtitles) In use Models answer multiple choice questions about videos with subtitles or audio added. Related questions are scored as groups to penalize guessing.
Qwen 3.8 Max 68.3%