Video-MME
Models answer 2,700 multiple-choice questions about 900 videos from 11 seconds to 1 hour long, with and without subtitles. Scored by accuracy.
Video-MME-v2 (2026-04) is a harder successor. MiniMax HF metadata maps its score to v2 though the card says Video-MME.
In the authors’ words
In the quest for artificial general intelligence, Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have emerged as a focal point in recent advancements. However, the predominant focus remains on developing their capabilities in static image understanding. The potential of MLLMs in processing sequential visual data is still insufficiently explored, highlighting the absence of a comprehensive, high-quality assessment of their performance. In this paper, we introduce Video-MME, the first-ever full-spectrum, Multi-Modal Evaluation benchmark of MLLMs in Video analysis. Our work distinguishes from existing benchmarks through four key features: 1) Diversity in video types, spanning 6 primary visual domains with 30 subfields to ensure broad scenario generalizability; 2) Duration in temporal dimension, encompassing both short-, medium-, and long-term videos, ranging from 11 seconds to 1 hour, for robust contextual dynamics; 3) Breadth in data modalities, integrating multi-modal inputs besides video frames, including subtitles and audios, to unveil the all-round capabilities of MLLMs; 4) Quality in annotations, utilizing rigorous manual labeling by expert annotators to facilitate precise and reliable model assessment. 900 videos with a total of 254 hours are manually selected and annotated by repeatedly viewing all the video content, resulting in 2,700 question-answer pairs. With Video-MME, we extensively evaluate various state-of-the-art MLLMs, including GPT-4 series and Gemini 1.5 Pro, as well as open-source image models like InternVL-Chat-V1.5 and video models like LLaVA-NeXT-Video. Our experiments reveal that Gemini 1.5 Pro is the best-performing commercial model, significantly outperforming the open-source models. Our dataset along with these findings underscores the need for further improvements in handling longer sequences and multi-modal data. Project Page: https://video-mme.github.io
- Level
- Everyday Most adults, without training
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Multiple choice
Qwen 3.8 Max leads with 90.4% among models released by Aug 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
The newest model with a score here came out in Aug 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 15 more
- 90.4
Qwen 3.8 Max
- 90.0 Kimi K3
- 89.5
Seed2.0 Pro
- 89.2
Seed2.1 Pro
- 89.0
Seed2.0 Lite (0428)
- 88.0
Qwen3.7-Plus
- 87.8
Seed1.8
- 87.8
Qwen 3.6 Plus
- 87.7 MiMo-V2.5
- 87.7
Qwen3.6 27B
- 87.5
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
- 87.4 Kimi K2.5
- 87.3
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- 86.9
Gemini 2.5 Pro
- 86.6
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B
- 85.4
MiniMax-M3
- 85.3 MiMo-V2-Omni
- 84.8
Gemini 2.5 Pro
- 83.7
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus
- 81.8 GLM-4.6V
- 81.5
Gemini 2.5 Flash
- 81.3
ERNIE 5.0
- 80.7 GLM-4.5V
- 79.1
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
- 79.0
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B
- 78.5 GPT-5 mini
- 78.3
Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B
- 78.2
LongCat-Flash-Omni
- 77.9
Seed1.5-VL
- 77.9
Nova 2 Omni Preview
- 73.6 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking
- 72.9
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B
- 72.4
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
- 72.2
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B
- 72.0 GPT-4.1
- 71.9 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506
- 70.5
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B
- 65.9
Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL
- 65.7 GPT-5 nano
- 55.0
Phi-4-multimodal
- 54.7
Llama-3.1-Nemotron-Nano-VL-8B-V1
- 50.8 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
- 1
Qwen 3.8 Max 90.4%
- 2 Kimi K3 90%
- 3
Seed2.0 Pro 89.5%
- 4
Seed2.1 Pro 89.2%
- 5
Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 89%
- 6
Qwen3.7-Plus 88%
- 7
Seed1.8 87.8%
- 8
Qwen 3.6 Plus 87.8%
- 9 MiMo-V2.5 87.7%
- 10
Qwen3.6 27B 87.7%
- 11
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 87.5%
- 12 Kimi K2.5 87.4%
- 13
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 87.3%
- 14
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 86.9%
- 15
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 86.6%
- 16
MiniMax-M3 85.4%
- 17 MiMo-V2-Omni 85.3%
- 18
Gemini 2.5 Pro May 2025 84.8%
- 19
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 83.7%
- 20 GLM-4.6V 81.8%
- 21
Gemini 2.5 Flash Jun 2025 81.5%
- 22
ERNIE 5.0 81.3%
- 23 GLM-4.5V 80.7%
- 24
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 79.1%
- 25
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 79%
- 26 GPT-5 mini 78.5%
- 27
Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B 78.3%
- 28
LongCat-Flash-Omni 78.2%
- 29
Seed1.5-VL 77.9%
- 30
Nova 2 Omni Preview 77.9%
- 31 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 73.6%
- 32
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 72.9%
- 33
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 72.4%
- 34
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B 72.2%
- 35 GPT-4.1 72%
- 36 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 71.9%
- 37
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 70.5%
- 38
Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL 65.9%
- 39 GPT-5 nano 65.7%
- 40
Phi-4-multimodal 55%
- 41
Llama-3.1-Nemotron-Nano-VL-8B-V1 54.7%
- 42 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct 50.8%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 90.4% | Aug 2026 | Model card | |
| 2 | Kimi K3 | 90% | Jul 2026 | Model card | |
| 3 | | 89.5% | Feb 2026 | Model card | |
| 4 | | 89.2% | Jun 2026 | Model card | |
| 5 | | 89% | Apr 2026 | Model card | |
| 6 | | 88% | Jun 2026 | Model card | |
| 7 | | 87.8% | Dec 2025 | Model card | |
| 8 | | 87.8% | Apr 2026 | Model card | |
| 9 | MiMo-V2.5 | 87.7% | Apr 2026 | Model card | |
| 10 | | 87.7% | Apr 2026 | Model card | |
| 11 | | 87.5% | Feb 2026 | Model card | |
| 12 | Kimi K2.5 | 87.4% | Jan 2026 | Model card | |
| 13 | | 87.3% | Feb 2026 | Model card | |
| 14 | | 86.9% | Jun 2025 | Model card | |
| 15 | | 86.6% | Apr 2026 | Model card | |
| 16 | | 85.4% | Jun 2026 | Model card | |
| 17 | MiMo-V2-Omni | 85.3% | Mar 2026 | Model card | |
| 18 | | 84.8% | May 2025 | Model card | |
| 19 | | 83.7% | Mar 2026 | Model card | |
| 20 | GLM-4.6V | 81.8% | Jan 2026 | Model card | |
| 21 | | 81.5% | Jul 2025 | Model card | |
| 22 | | 81.3% | Feb 2026 | Model card | |
| 23 | GLM-4.5V | 80.7% | Aug 2025 | Model card | |
| 24 | | 79.1% | Jan 2025 | Model card | |
| 25 | | 79% | Sep 2025 | Model card | |
| 26 | GPT-5 mini | 78.5% | Aug 2025 | Model card | |
| 27 | | 78.3% | May 2026 | Model card | |
| 28 | | 78.2% | Oct 2025 | Model card | |
| 29 | | 77.9% | May 2025 | Model card | |
| 30 | | 77.9% | Dec 2025 | Model card | |
| 31 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking | 73.6% | Jul 2025 | Model card | |
| 32 | | 72.9% | Aug 2025 | Model card | |
| 33 | | 72.4% | Mar 2025 | Model card | |
| 34 | | 72.2% | Apr 2026 | Model card | |
| 35 | GPT-4.1 | 72% | Apr 2025 | Model card | |
| 36 | Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 | 71.9% | Jun 2025 | Model card | |
| 37 | | 70.5% | Sep 2025 | Model card | |
| 38 | | 65.9% | Oct 2025 | Model card | |
| 39 | GPT-5 nano | 65.7% | Aug 2025 | Model card | |
| 40 | | 55% | Feb 2025 | Model card | |
| 41 | | 54.7% | Jun 2025 | Model card | |
| 42 | Phi-3.5-vision-instruct | 50.8% | Aug 2024 | Model card |
The benchmark's own leaderboard has 51 entries, 26 of them models we track. Epoch AI has scores for 50 models. We plot every source in the charts below.
Scores at each effort level
Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.
| Model | Effort | Harness | Score | Cost per task | Output tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | with subtitles | 81.6% | |||
| | with subtitles | 81.3% | |||
| | without subtitles | 79.7% | |||
| Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct | with subtitles | 77.8% | |||
| GPT-4o May 2024 | with subtitles | 77.2% | |||
| LLaVA-Video-72B-Qwen2 | with subtitles | 76.9% | |||
| | with subtitles | 75% | |||
| | without subtitles | 75% | |||
| | with subtitles | 74% | |||
| | with subtitles | 74% | |||
| | without subtitles | 73% | |||
| Aria | with subtitles | 72.1% | |||
| | without subtitles | 72.1% | |||
| GPT-4o May 2024 | without subtitles | 71.9% | |||
| LinVT | with subtitles | 71.7% | |||
| Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct | without subtitles | 71.2% | |||
| LLaVA-Video-72B-Qwen2 | without subtitles | 70.6% | |||
| | without subtitles | 70.3% | |||
| LinVT | without subtitles | 70.3% | |||
| LLaVA-OneVision 72B | with subtitles | 69.6% | |||
| GPT-4o mini | with subtitles | 68.9% | |||
| | with subtitles | 68.1% | |||
| MiniCPM-o-2_6 | with subtitles | 67.9% | |||
| Aria | without subtitles | 67.6% | |||
| LLaVA-OneVision 72B | without subtitles | 66.3% | |||
| GPT-4o mini | without subtitles | 64.8% | |||
| MiniCPM-o-2_6 | without subtitles | 63.9% | |||
| MiniCPM-V-2_6 | with subtitles | 63.7% | |||
| GPT-4V | with subtitles | 63.3% | |||
| Claude 3.5 Sonnet | with subtitles | 62.9% | |||
| TimeMarker | with subtitles | 62.8% | |||
| MiniCPM-V-2_6 | without subtitles | 60.9% | |||
| Claude 3.5 Sonnet | without subtitles | 60% | |||
| GPT-4V | without subtitles | 59.9% | |||
| | without subtitles | 59.3% | |||
| VITA | with subtitles | 59.2% | |||
| VITA-1.5 | with subtitles | 58.7% | |||
| kangaroo | with subtitles | 57.6% | |||
| TimeMarker | without subtitles | 57.3% | |||
| VITA-1.5 | without subtitles | 56.1% | |||
| kangaroo | without subtitles | 56% | |||
| VITA | without subtitles | 55.8% | |||
| InternVL-Chat-V1-5 | with subtitles | 52.4% | |||
| Qwen-VL-Max | without subtitles | 51.3% | |||
| Qwen-VL-Max | with subtitles | 51.2% | |||
| InternVL-Chat-V1-5 | without subtitles | 50.7% | |||
| video_chat2_mistral | with subtitles | 43.8% | |||
| ST-LLM | with subtitles | 42.3% | |||
| Qwen-VL-Chat | with subtitles | 41.9% | |||
| Qwen-VL-Chat | without subtitles | 41.1% | |||
| video_chat2_mistral | without subtitles | 39.5% | |||
| ST-LLM | without subtitles | 37.9% |
4 models have held number one since its release in May 2024
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard, Epoch AI’s runs and what labs claim in their cards.
The best score passed 85% in Jun 2025
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
4 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 Aug 2026 | 90.4 | VideoMME (w/ Sub.) | |
| 16 Jul 2026 | Kimi K3 | 90 | Video-MME (w. sub) |
| 23 Jun 2026 | 89.2 | VideoMME | |
| 1 Jun 2026 | 88 | VideoMME (w/ sub.) | |
| 1 Jun 2026 | 85.4 | VideoMME (w/ sub) | |
| 25 May 2026 | 78.3 | VideoMME (w/o sub.) | |
| 28 Apr 2026 | 72.2 | Video MME | |
| 28 Apr 2026 | 89 | VideoMME | |
| 22 Apr 2026 | 87.7 | VideoMME(w sub.) | |
| 22 Apr 2026 | MiMo-V2.5 | 87.7 | Video-MME |
| 15 Apr 2026 | 86.6 | Best of VideoMME(w sub.) 86.6 / VideoMME(w/o sub.) 82.5 | |
| 2 Apr 2026 | 87.8 | Best of VideoMME(w sub.) / VideoMME(w/o sub.) | |
| 30 Mar 2026 | 83.7 | Best of VideoMME (with audio) 83.7 / VideoMME(w/o sub.) 81.9 | |
| 18 Mar 2026 | MiMo-V2-Omni | 85.3 | Video-MME |
| 24 Feb 2026 | 87.3 | Best of VideoMME(w sub.) 87.3 / VideoMME(w/o sub.) 83.9 | |
| 16 Feb 2026 | 87.5 | Best of VideoMME(w sub.) / VideoMME(w/o sub.) | |
| 14 Feb 2026 | 89.5 | VideoMME (with subtitles) | |
| 6 Feb 2026 | 81.3 | VideoMME (w sub) | |
| 27 Jan 2026 | Kimi K2.5 | 87.4 | VideoMME |
| 18 Dec 2025 | 87.8 | VideoMME (with subtitles) | |
| 2 Dec 2025 | 77.9 | VideoMME accuracy | |
| 31 Oct 2025 | 78.2 | Best of VideoMME (w/o audio) 76.2 / VideoMME (w/ audio) 78.2 | |
| 28 Oct 2025 | 65.9 | Video-MME w/o sub | |
| 23 Sep 2025 | 79 | VideoMME(w/o sub) | |
| 22 Sep 2025 | 70.5 | Video-MME | |
| 25 Aug 2025 | 72.9 | VideoMME (w/o sub) | |
| 11 Aug 2025 | GLM-4.5V | 80.7 | VideoMME (w/ sub) |
| 7 Aug 2025 | GPT-5 nano | 65.7 | VideoMME (long, with subtitle category) |
| 7 Aug 2025 | GPT-5 mini | 78.5 | VideoMME (long, with subtitle category) |
| 1 Jul 2025 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking | 73.6 | VideoMME (w/) |
| 21 Jun 2025 | Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 | 71.9 | Video-MME (w/ sub.) |
| 17 Jun 2025 | 86.9 | VideoMME (Audio, visual, subtitles) | |
| 3 Jun 2025 | 54.7 | VideoMME* (1 tile per image) | |
| 12 May 2025 | 77.9 | VideoMME (w/o sub) | |
| 6 May 2025 | 84.8 | VideoMME | |
| 14 Apr 2025 | GPT-4.1 | 72 | Video-MME (long, no subtitles) |
| 27 Mar 2025 | 72.4 | Best of Video-MME w sub 72.4 / w/o sub 64.3 | |
| 26 Feb 2025 | 55 | Video MME 16 frames | |
| 28 Jan 2025 | 79.1 | Best of VideoMME w sub. 79.1 / VideoMME w/o sub. 73.3 |
26 system cards report it, from 12 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27 Jul 2026 | Kimi K3 technical report | 90 | Video-MME (w/ sub) (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 23 Jun 2026 | | 89.2 | VideoMME (Table 10) | Capabilities |
| 9 Jun 2026 | | 78.3 | Video-MME (w/o sub.) (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 27 Apr 2026 | | 72.2 | VideoMME (w/o sub), reasoning on, 70.8 reasoning off (Table 7) | Capabilities |
| 17 Apr 2026 | | 83.7 | VideoMME with audio, use_audio_in_video=True (Table 7). VideoMME (w/o sub.) 81.9 (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| 21 Mar 2026 | | 87.8 | VideoMME, with subtitles (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| 14 Feb 2026 | | 89.5 | VideoMME, with subtitles (Table 9) | Capabilities |
| 4 Feb 2026 | | 81.3 | VideoMME (w sub), with subtitles (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| 30 Jan 2026 | Kimi K2.5 technical report | 87.4 | Video-MME (with subtitles) (Table 4) | Capabilities |
| 1 Jan 2026 | GLM-4.6V technical report | 81.8 | VideoMME (w/sub), GLM-4.6V thinking (Table 2). VideoMME (w/o sub) 74.8 | Capabilities |
| 2 Dec 2025 | | 77.9 | VideoMME accuracy, video with audio (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| 26 Nov 2025 | | 79 | Video-MME w/o sub. (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 6 Nov 2025 | | 63 | VideoMME (w/o sub), reasoning on (Table 3). Reasoning off 66.0 | Capabilities |
| 31 Oct 2025 | | 78.2 | VideoMME w/ audio, without subtitles, 32K context (Table 6). VideoMME w/o audio 76.2 | Capabilities |
| 22 Sep 2025 | | 70.5 | Video-MME w/o sub, Instruct (Table 9). Thinking 69.7 (Table 10) | Capabilities |
| 25 Aug 2025 | | 72.9 | VideoMME (w/o sub) (Table 2). With subtitles 76.0 (Table 9) | Capabilities |
| 13 Aug 2025 | GLM-4.5V technical report | 80.7 | VideoMME (w/sub), GLM-4.5V thinking (Table 2). VideoMME (w/o sub) 74.6 | Capabilities |
| 7 Jul 2025 | | 86.9 | VideoMME, audio + visual + subtitles, full test set, 0-shot (Table 6); audio + visual on Long subset = 84.3 | Capabilities |
| 7 Jul 2025 | | 81.5 | VideoMME, audio + visual + subtitles, full test set, 0-shot (Table 6); audio + visual on Long subset = 75.5 | Capabilities |
| 1 Jul 2025 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking technical report | 73.6 | VideoMME (w/sub), GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking thinking (Table 2). VideoMME (w/o sub) 68.2 | Capabilities |
| 23 Jun 2025 | Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 technical report | 71.9 | Video-MME (w/ sub.) (Acc) (Table 5) | Capabilities |
| 11 May 2025 | | 77.9 | VideoMME (w/o sub), thinking (Table 7). Non-thinking 77.6 | Capabilities |
| 26 Mar 2025 | | 64.3 | Video-MME w/o sub (Table 7). With subtitles 72.4 | Capabilities |
| 3 Mar 2025 | | 55 | VideoMME-16Frame (test) (Table 1) | Capabilities |
| 19 Feb 2025 | | 73.3 | Video-MME w/o sub. 73.3, w sub. 79.1 (Table 8) | Capabilities |
| 30 Aug 2024 | | 50.8 | VideoMME (test), 16 frames (Table 6) | Capabilities |
Versions
We switch the top row to each new version when it comes out. Open it for one row per version. An old version stays in play while people still test it, so whoever first takes it past 85% gets credit for closing it out.
More in Audio and video
- Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
- LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization.
Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
- MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
- MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
- VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules.
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%
- TVBench In use Models answer multiple-choice questions on 10 temporal video tasks, such as action counting and ordering, that static frames cannot solve. Scored by accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 81.9%