VIALS 2
Models interpret 161 professional life-science visual artifacts. The score is judged accuracy averaged across three rollouts.
The official changelog requires reruns after three task changes. Values are transcribed from the current chart and hash-checked. Unlabeled confidence intervals are not digitized.
- Made by
- Handshake AI Research
- Released
- October 2026
- Kind
- Genomics and life sciences
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Graded by a model
- Answers
- Short answer
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-6 Astra #3 on the capability index
- Last model added
- October 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
GPT-6 Astra leads with 49.9%
Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.
- 1 GPT-6 Astra 49.9%
- 2 GPT-6.1 Sol 49.1%
- 3
Gemini 4 Argon 47.2%
- 4 Claude Sonnet 5.5 41%
- 5 Claude Opus 5.5 40.2%
- 6
Muse Wonder 31.5%
- 7
Gemini 3.8 Flash 29.4%
- 8 GPT-5.6 Sol 26.5%
- 9 Claude Opus 5 24.4%
- 10
Muse Spark 1.2 22.6%
- 11 Kimi K3 20.9%
- 12 Grok 4.7 18.2%
- 13
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 12.6%
- 14
MiniMax-M3 10.8%
Source: Official VIALS 2 leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-6 Astra | 49.9% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | GPT-6.1 Sol | 49.1% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | | 47.2% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 41% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | Claude Opus 5.5 | 40.2% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | | 31.5% | Oct 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 29.4% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 26.5% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | Claude Opus 5 | 24.4% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | | 22.6% | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | Kimi K3 | 20.9% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | Grok 4.7 | 18.2% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | | 12.6% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | | 10.8% | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official VIALS 2 leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official VIALS 2 leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
Versions
More in Biology and chemistry
- GeneBench Pro In use Agents analyze messy simulated genomics and biology datasets to estimate a decision-relevant quantity across 129 problems. Scored automatically against known answers. GPT-5.6 Sol 31.5%
- SUPERChem In use Models solve 500 expert-written chemistry reasoning problems, offered in multimodal and text-only forms. Expert solution paths also allow a reasoning path score.
Tencent Hy4 preview 66.4%
- LifeSciBench In use Models complete 750 expert-written life science research tasks, often with attached figures, tables, or sequence files. Graded against expert rubrics as score and pass rate. GPT-Rosalind-6 61.3%
- MedChemBench (OpenAI) In use Models answer chemistry questions from an OpenAI internal set, grouped with OpenAI's life science research evaluations. OpenAI has not published the task format. GPT-Rosalind-6 49.6%
- ProtocolQA Open-Ended In use Models correct errors in published lab protocols using open-ended questions adapted from LAB-Bench ProtocolQA. Scored as pass@1. GPT-6 Cyber 47.2%
- MolecularIQ In use Models answer questions about molecular graphs, such as counting, indexing and constrained generation, and a symbolic checker verifies each answer. gpt-oss-120b 47.5%