Benchmark Almanac

SUPERChem

Tencent Hy4 preview 66.4% leads since Aug 2026 In use

Models solve 500 expert-written chemistry reasoning problems, offered in multimodal and text-only forms. Expert solution paths also allow a reasoning path score.

Humans scored 40.3% at release and GPT-5 (High) scored 38.5%. ByteDance Seed reports the text-only form.

In the authors’ words

Current benchmarks for evaluating the chemical reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) are limited by oversimplified tasks, lack of process-level evaluation, and misalignment with expert-level chemistry skills. To address these issues, we introduce SUPERChem, a benchmark of 500 expert-curated reasoning-intensive chemistry problems, covering diverse subfields and provided in both multimodal and text-only formats. Original content and an iterative curation pipeline eliminate flawed items and mitigate data contamination. Each problem is paired with an expert-authored solution path, enabling Reasoning Path Fidelity (RPF) scoring to evaluate reasoning quality beyond final-answer accuracy. Evaluations against a human baseline of 40.3% accuracy show that even the best-performing model, GPT-5 (High), reaches only 38.5%, followed closely by Gemini 2.5 Pro (37.9%) and DeepSeek-V3.1-Think (37.3%). SUPERChem elicits multi-step, multimodal reasoning, reveals model-dependent effects of visual information, and distinguishes high-fidelity reasoners from heuristic ones. By providing a challenging benchmark and a reliable evaluation framework, SUPERChem aims to facilitate the advancement of LLMs toward expert-level chemical intelligence. The dataset of the benchmark is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/ZehuaZhao/SUPERChem.

Abstract of SUPERChem: A Multimodal Reasoning Benchmark in Chemistry (arXiv:2512.01274, CC0)
Made by Zhao et al. Released Dec 2025 Genomics and life sciences All tasks public Last in a launch post Aug 2026 Last model added Aug 2026
Level
Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
5
Models scored in lab cards
4
Launch posts list it, from 2 labs
2
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Tencent Hy4 preview leads with 66.4% among models released by Aug 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Aug 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Tencent Hy4 preview 66.4%
  2. 2 Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
  3. 3 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 55%
  4. 4 Tencent Hy3 54.9%
  5. 5 Seed2.0 Pro 51.6%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Tencent Hy4 preview 66.4% Aug 2026 Model card
2 Seed2.1 Pro 59.8% Jun 2026 Model card
3 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 55% Apr 2026 Model card
4 Tencent Hy3 54.9% Jul 2026 Model card
5 Seed2.0 Pro 51.6% Feb 2026 Model card

4 models have held number one since its release in Dec 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

ByteDance Seed Tencent
Lab claims Not tested since Aug 2026

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Tencent Hy4 preview Seed2.1 Pro Seed2.0 Lite (0428) Seed2.0 Pro 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Tencent Hy4 preview Seed2.1 Pro

One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

ByteDance Seed
Tencent
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
28 Aug 2026 Tencent Hy4 preview 66.4 SUPERChem
2 Jul 2026 Tencent Hy3 54.9 SuperChem
28 Apr 2026 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 55 Superchem (text-only)
14 Feb 2026 Seed2.0 Pro 51.6 Superchem (text-only)

2 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
23 Jun 2026 Seed2.1 Pro model card 59.8 SuperChem (Table 11) Capabilities
14 Feb 2026 Seed2.0 Pro model card 51.6 Superchem (text-only) (Table 3). Table 13 prints 53.0 Capabilities

More in Biology and chemistry

All 96 in Biology and chemistry
  • GeneBench Pro In use Agents analyze messy simulated genomics and biology datasets to estimate a decision-relevant quantity across 129 problems. Scored automatically against known answers. GPT-6 Astra 37.1%
  • LifeSciBench In use Models complete 750 expert-written life science research tasks, often with attached figures, tables, or sequence files. Graded against expert rubrics as score and pass rate. GPT-6 Astra 60.3%
  • MolecularIQ In use Models answer questions about molecular graphs, such as counting, indexing and constrained generation, and a symbolic checker verifies each answer. Intern-S2-397B 62.4%
  • TOMG-Bench In use Models generate molecules from natural language requests in three tasks: molecule editing, molecule optimization and customized generation. Each output is checked for validity and for meeting the requested properties. Intern-S2-397B 66.8%
  • BABE Fading Models reason from experimental results in peer-reviewed biology papers to draw conclusions, with causal and cross-scale inference. Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 57.9%
  • Biology-Instructions Fading Models answer multi-omics sequence tasks on DNA, RNA, protein and multi-molecule inputs, such as property prediction and interaction tasks. Scored per task with task metrics. Intern-S2-397B 55.7%