Benchmark Almanac

TurnBench

OpenYap Turn 97.8% tops its leaderboard Moshi 23.3% leads the models we track
Not in model cards

Turn-taking systems listen to two-person conversations and must detect when a speaker's turn ends and when the other speaker interrupts. The test set has 116 English conversations in six interaction styles, each labeled by three annotators. Systems rank by recall, and a system whose false-positive rate exceeds 0.15 ranks below every qualifying system. Latency after each event is also reported.

Test labels are withheld, and submissions go by email with predictions and a public write-up. Systems must be causal, using audio only up to the current moment. Entries mix dedicated turn detectors with realtime voice models, and 12 of the 26 entries are outside submissions. About 60 GitHub stars.

Released
August 2026
Kind
Speech recognition and translation
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
Public, plus a private test set
Last model added
September 2024
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Speakers in natural conversation take turns speaking and listening, deciding in real time when to take, hold, or yield the floor. However, turn-taking evaluation remains limited due to the lack of a consistent, linguistically grounded evaluation protocol and hand-annotated data covering diverse conversation types. To address this, we present TurnBench, a multi-domain benchmark that pairs a 30-hour, hand-labeled corpus of dyadic human conversation with a standardized evaluation protocol for end-of-turn and interruption detection. We set conversation type as a controllable experimental variable, covering six distinct interaction styles, and triple-annotate each conversation. Benchmarking 14 heterogeneous turn-taking systems, we find end-of-turn recall stable across types, while interruption false positives are strongly type-dependent and concentrated in backchannel-dense interaction styles. Although in smooth floor transfers human listeners begin speaking a median 151 ms before the current turn ends, no current system performs equivalently without incurring excessive false positives. We release our corpus, a 104-hour training set, and a public leaderboard with an interactive dataset viewer at https://turnbench.sesame.com.

Abstract of TurnBench: A Multi-Domain Benchmark for Turn-Taking Dynamics in Spoken Dialogue (arXiv:2608.25218, CC0)
26
Entries on its own leaderboard, 1 model we track

OpenYap Turn tops the leaderboard with 97.8%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Moshi, at 23.3%.

  1. 1 OpenYap Turn Overall 97.8%
  2. 2 p99lab turn-1-mini Overall 97.5%
  3. 3 Zero Runtime Echo Omni Duplex Overall 97%
  4. 4 Joveo BarnOwl Overall 96.9%
  5. 5 Vox Maru v1 Overall 96%
  6. 6 Neosapience Nunchi v2 Overall 95.9%
  7. 7 OpenAI Realtime (Server VAD) Overall; FPR above qualification threshold 95.5%
  8. 8 Ooma Turn Detector Overall 95.1%
  9. 9 Tavus Sparrow-2 Overall 93%
  10. 10 VoxTurn Overall 92.4%
  11. 11 SPX-AI MicroCF Overall 90.6%
  12. 12 Voice Activity Projection Overall 84.5%
  13. 13 Zero Runtime Echo Omni Overall 83.9%
  14. 14 ESPnet Turntaking Overall 82.6%
  15. 15 FD-VAD Overall 82.6%
  16. 16 WavLM Large Anchor Overall 80%
  17. 17 Mimi Endpointer Overall 78.2%
  18. 18 Kyutai Semantic VAD Overall 77.3%
  19. 19 Smart Turn v3 Overall 75.2%
  20. 20 RMS Energy VAD Overall; FPR above qualification threshold 71.8%
  21. 21 ESPnet Turntaking Perchannel Overall 71.1%
  22. 22 Gemini 3.1 Live Overall 65.7%
  23. 23 WavLM Large Causal Overall 40.8%
  24. 24 WavLM Base Causal Overall 40.3%
  25. 25 OpenAI Realtime (Semantic VAD) Overall 30.3%
  26. 26 Moshi Overall 23.3%

Source: Official TurnBench leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 OpenYap Turn 97.8% Overall Official leaderboard
2 p99lab turn-1-mini 97.5% Overall Official leaderboard
3 Zero Runtime Echo Omni Duplex 97% Overall Official leaderboard
4 Joveo BarnOwl 96.9% Overall Official leaderboard
5 Vox Maru v1 96% Overall Official leaderboard
6 Neosapience Nunchi v2 95.9% Overall Official leaderboard
7 OpenAI Realtime (Server VAD) 95.5% Overall; FPR above qualification threshold Official leaderboard
8 Ooma Turn Detector 95.1% Overall Official leaderboard
9 Tavus Sparrow-2 93% Overall Official leaderboard
10 VoxTurn 92.4% Overall Official leaderboard
11 SPX-AI MicroCF 90.6% Overall Official leaderboard
12 Voice Activity Projection 84.5% Overall Official leaderboard
13 Zero Runtime Echo Omni 83.9% Overall Official leaderboard
14 ESPnet Turntaking 82.6% Overall Official leaderboard
15 FD-VAD 82.6% Overall Official leaderboard
16 WavLM Large Anchor 80% Overall Official leaderboard
17 Mimi Endpointer 78.2% Overall Official leaderboard
18 Kyutai Semantic VAD 77.3% Overall Official leaderboard
19 Smart Turn v3 75.2% Overall Official leaderboard
20 RMS Energy VAD 71.8% Overall; FPR above qualification threshold Official leaderboard
21 ESPnet Turntaking Perchannel 71.1% Overall Official leaderboard
22 Gemini 3.1 Live 65.7% Overall Official leaderboard
23 WavLM Large Causal 40.8% Overall Official leaderboard
24 WavLM Base Causal 40.3% Overall Official leaderboard
25 OpenAI Realtime (Semantic VAD) 30.3% Overall Official leaderboard
26 Moshi 23.3% Overall Sep 2024 Official leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Near the ceiling (85%) Moshi 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Near the ceiling (85%) Moshi

Source: Official TurnBench leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Audio and video

All 232 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better. Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%