TurnBench
Turn-taking systems listen to two-person conversations and must detect when a speaker's turn ends and when the other speaker interrupts. The test set has 116 English conversations in six interaction styles, each labeled by three annotators. Systems rank by recall, and a system whose false-positive rate exceeds 0.15 ranks below every qualifying system. Latency after each event is also reported.
Test labels are withheld, and submissions go by email with predictions and a public write-up. Systems must be causal, using audio only up to the current moment. Entries mix dedicated turn detectors with realtime voice models, and 12 of the 26 entries are outside submissions. About 60 GitHub stars.
- Made by
- Sesame AI with Mundo AI, Carnegie Mellon University and others
- Released
- August 2026
- Kind
- Speech recognition and translation
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Short answer
- Tasks
- Public, plus a private test set
- Last model added
- September 2024
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Speakers in natural conversation take turns speaking and listening, deciding in real time when to take, hold, or yield the floor. However, turn-taking evaluation remains limited due to the lack of a consistent, linguistically grounded evaluation protocol and hand-annotated data covering diverse conversation types. To address this, we present TurnBench, a multi-domain benchmark that pairs a 30-hour, hand-labeled corpus of dyadic human conversation with a standardized evaluation protocol for end-of-turn and interruption detection. We set conversation type as a controllable experimental variable, covering six distinct interaction styles, and triple-annotate each conversation. Benchmarking 14 heterogeneous turn-taking systems, we find end-of-turn recall stable across types, while interruption false positives are strongly type-dependent and concentrated in backchannel-dense interaction styles. Although in smooth floor transfers human listeners begin speaking a median 151 ms before the current turn ends, no current system performs equivalently without incurring excessive false positives. We release our corpus, a 104-hour training set, and a public leaderboard with an interactive dataset viewer at https://turnbench.sesame.com.
OpenYap Turn tops the leaderboard with 97.8%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Moshi, at 23.3%.
- 97.8 OpenYap Turn
- 97.5 p99lab turn-1-mini
- 97.0 Zero Runtime Echo Omni Duplex
- 96.9 Joveo BarnOwl
- 96.0 Vox Maru v1
- 95.9 Neosapience Nunchi v2
- 95.5 OpenAI Realtime (Server VAD)
- 95.1 Ooma Turn Detector
- 93.0 Tavus Sparrow-2
- 92.4 VoxTurn
- 90.6 SPX-AI MicroCF
- 84.5 Voice Activity Projection
- 83.9 Zero Runtime Echo Omni
- 82.6 ESPnet Turntaking
- 82.6 FD-VAD
- 80.0 WavLM Large Anchor
- 78.2 Mimi Endpointer
- 77.3 Kyutai Semantic VAD
- 75.2 Smart Turn v3
- 71.8 RMS Energy VAD
- 71.1 ESPnet Turntaking Perchannel
- 65.7 Gemini 3.1 Live
- 40.8 WavLM Large Causal
- 40.3 WavLM Base Causal
- 30.3 OpenAI Realtime (Semantic VAD)
- 23.3
Moshi
- 1 OpenYap Turn Overall 97.8%
- 2 p99lab turn-1-mini Overall 97.5%
- 3 Zero Runtime Echo Omni Duplex Overall 97%
- 4 Joveo BarnOwl Overall 96.9%
- 5 Vox Maru v1 Overall 96%
- 6 Neosapience Nunchi v2 Overall 95.9%
- 7 OpenAI Realtime (Server VAD) Overall; FPR above qualification threshold 95.5%
- 8 Ooma Turn Detector Overall 95.1%
- 9 Tavus Sparrow-2 Overall 93%
- 10 VoxTurn Overall 92.4%
- 11 SPX-AI MicroCF Overall 90.6%
- 12 Voice Activity Projection Overall 84.5%
- 13 Zero Runtime Echo Omni Overall 83.9%
- 14 ESPnet Turntaking Overall 82.6%
- 15 FD-VAD Overall 82.6%
- 16 WavLM Large Anchor Overall 80%
- 17 Mimi Endpointer Overall 78.2%
- 18 Kyutai Semantic VAD Overall 77.3%
- 19 Smart Turn v3 Overall 75.2%
- 20 RMS Energy VAD Overall; FPR above qualification threshold 71.8%
- 21 ESPnet Turntaking Perchannel Overall 71.1%
- 22 Gemini 3.1 Live Overall 65.7%
- 23 WavLM Large Causal Overall 40.8%
- 24 WavLM Base Causal Overall 40.3%
- 25 OpenAI Realtime (Semantic VAD) Overall 30.3%
- 26
Moshi Overall 23.3%
Source: Official TurnBench leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OpenYap Turn | 97.8% | Overall | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | p99lab turn-1-mini | 97.5% | Overall | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | Zero Runtime Echo Omni Duplex | 97% | Overall | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | Joveo BarnOwl | 96.9% | Overall | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | Vox Maru v1 | 96% | Overall | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | Neosapience Nunchi v2 | 95.9% | Overall | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | OpenAI Realtime (Server VAD) | 95.5% | Overall; FPR above qualification threshold | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | Ooma Turn Detector | 95.1% | Overall | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | Tavus Sparrow-2 | 93% | Overall | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | VoxTurn | 92.4% | Overall | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | SPX-AI MicroCF | 90.6% | Overall | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | Voice Activity Projection | 84.5% | Overall | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | Zero Runtime Echo Omni | 83.9% | Overall | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | ESPnet Turntaking | 82.6% | Overall | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | FD-VAD | 82.6% | Overall | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | WavLM Large Anchor | 80% | Overall | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | Mimi Endpointer | 78.2% | Overall | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | Kyutai Semantic VAD | 77.3% | Overall | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | Smart Turn v3 | 75.2% | Overall | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | RMS Energy VAD | 71.8% | Overall; FPR above qualification threshold | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | ESPnet Turntaking Perchannel | 71.1% | Overall | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | Gemini 3.1 Live | 65.7% | Overall | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | WavLM Large Causal | 40.8% | Overall | Official leaderboard | |
| 24 | WavLM Base Causal | 40.3% | Overall | Official leaderboard | |
| 25 | OpenAI Realtime (Semantic VAD) | 30.3% | Overall | Official leaderboard | |
| 26 | | 23.3% | Overall | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official TurnBench leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Audio and video
- Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
- LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization.
Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
- MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
- MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
- FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better.
Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
- VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules.
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%