Benchmark Almanac

MMAU

Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 82.2% leads since Mar 2026 In use

10K audio clips with questions on speech, sound and music needing expert knowledge and reasoning. Multiple-choice accuracy.

In the authors’ words

The ability to comprehend audio–which includes speech, non-speech sounds, and music–is crucial for AI agents to interact effectively with the world. We present MMAU, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate multimodal audio understanding models on tasks requiring expert-level knowledge and complex reasoning. MMAU comprises 10k carefully curated audio clips paired with human-annotated natural language questions and answers spanning speech, environmental sounds, and music. It includes information extraction and reasoning questions, requiring models to demonstrate 27 distinct skills across unique and challenging tasks. Unlike existing benchmarks, MMAU emphasizes advanced perception and reasoning with domain-specific knowledge, challenging models to tackle tasks akin to those faced by experts. We assess 18 open-source and proprietary (Large) Audio-Language Models, demonstrating the significant challenges posed by MMAU. Notably, even the most advanced Gemini Pro v1.5 achieves only 52.97% accuracy, and the state-of-the-art open-source Qwen2-Audio achieves only 52.50%, highlighting considerable room for improvement. We believe MMAU will drive the audio and multimodal research community to develop more advanced audio understanding models capable of solving complex audio tasks.

Abstract of MMAU: A Massive Multi-Task Audio Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark (arXiv:2410.19168, CC0)
Made by University of Maryland Released Oct 2024 Audio understanding and voice Public tasks plus a private test set Last in a launch post Sep 2026 Last model added Sep 2026 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
University Undergraduates and entry-level professionals
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Multiple choice
14
Models scored in lab cards
11
Launch posts list it, from 7 labs
14
System cards report it, from 10 labs

Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus leads with 82.2%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 82.2%
  2. 2 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 81.8%
  3. 3 ERNIE 5.0 80.4%
  4. 4 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 77.5%
  5. 5 Inkling 77.2%
  6. 6 Inkling-Small 77%
  7. 7 LongCat-Flash-Omni 75.9%
  8. 8 Nova 2 Omni Preview 75.3%
  9. 9 MiMo-Audio-7B-Instruct 74.9%
  10. 10 Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B 74.6%
  11. 11 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 65.6%
  12. 12 Kimi-Audio-7B-Instruct 65.2%
  13. 13 Voxtral Small 62.2%
  14. 14 Phi-4-multimodal 55.6%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 82.2% Mar 2026 Model card
2 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 81.8% Sep 2026 Model card
3 ERNIE 5.0 80.4% Feb 2026 Model card
4 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 77.5% Sep 2025 Model card
5 Inkling 77.2% Jul 2026 Model card
6 Inkling-Small 77% Jul 2026 Model card
7 LongCat-Flash-Omni 75.9% Oct 2025 Model card
8 Nova 2 Omni Preview 75.3% Dec 2025 Model card
9 MiMo-Audio-7B-Instruct 74.9% Sep 2025 Model card
10 Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B 74.6% Apr 2026 Model card
11 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 65.6% Mar 2025 Model card
12 Kimi-Audio-7B-Instruct 65.2% Apr 2025 Model card
13 Voxtral Small 62.2% Jul 2025 Model card
14 Phi-4-multimodal 55.6% Mar 2025 Model card

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 20 entries, 1 of them models we track. We plot every source in the charts below.

6 models have held number one since its release in Oct 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Microsoft Qwen Xiaomi Corp Baidu
Lab claims 6 leaders

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B Qwen2.5-Omni-7B Phi-4-multimodal Qwen2-Audio-7B-Instruct 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus MiMo-Audio-7B-Instruct

2 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Qwen
Moonshot AI
Xiaomi Corp
Meituan
Amazon
NVIDIA
Thinking Machines
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
18 Sep 2026 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 81.8 MMAU Audio Understanding
30 Jul 2026 Inkling-Small 77 MMAU
15 Jul 2026 Inkling 77.2 MMAU
28 Apr 2026 Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B 74.6 MMAU (BF16, non-reasoning, quantization table)
30 Mar 2026 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 82.2 MMAU
2 Dec 2025 Nova 2 Omni Preview 75.3 MMAU average accuracy (Speech 81.8, Sound 77.9, Music 66.4)
31 Oct 2025 LongCat-Flash-Omni 75.9 MMAU
22 Sep 2025 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 77.5 MMAU-v05.15.25
18 Sep 2025 MiMo-Audio-7B-Instruct 74.9 MMAU
25 Apr 2025 Kimi-Audio-7B-Instruct 65.2 Mean of MMAU music 61.68 / sound 73.27 / speech 60.66
27 Mar 2025 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 65.6 MMAU Avg (Sound 67.87 / Music 69.16 / Speech 59.76)

14 system cards report it, from 10 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
22 Sep 2026 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash technical report 81.8 MMAU (Table 4) Capabilities
30 Jul 2026 Inkling-Small model card 77 MMAU (5. Evaluations table) Capabilities
15 Jul 2026 Inkling model card 77.2 MMAU (5. Evaluations table, effort 0.99) Capabilities
27 Apr 2026 Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B technical report 74.6 MMAU Avg, reasoning off (Table 8). Music 74.2, Audio 76.9, Speech 72.8 Capabilities
17 Apr 2026 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus technical report 82.2 MMAU (Table 5) Capabilities
4 Feb 2026 ERNIE 5.0 technical report 80.4 MMAU (Table 7) Capabilities
2 Dec 2025 Nova 2 Omni Preview technical report 75.3 MMAU Avg accuracy, Speech 81.8, Sound 77.9, Music 66.4 (Table 7) Capabilities
31 Oct 2025 LongCat-Flash-Omni technical report 75.9 MMAU (Table 10) Capabilities
22 Sep 2025 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B technical report 77.5 MMAU-v05.15.25, Instruct (Table 7). Thinking 75.4 Capabilities
18 Sep 2025 MiMo-Audio-7B-Instruct technical report 74.9 MMAU Overall, Speech 68.47, Sound 82.58, Music 73.65 (Table 8) Capabilities
17 Jul 2025 Voxtral Small technical report 62.2 MMAU*, marked as a speech-synthesized subset (Table 8) Capabilities
25 Apr 2025 Kimi-Audio-7B-Instruct technical report MMAU music 61.68, sound 73.27, speech 60.66, no overall score (Table 5) Capabilities
26 Mar 2025 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B technical report 65.6 MMAU Avg (Table 3). Sound 67.87, Music 69.16, Speech 59.76 Capabilities
3 Mar 2025 Phi-4-multimodal technical report 55.6 MMAU, accuracy (Table 3) Capabilities

Versions

We switch the top row to each new version when it comes out. Open it for one row per version. An old version stays in play while people still test it, so whoever first takes it past 85% gets credit for closing it out.

Qwen Microsoft Xiaomi Corp Baidu Google DeepMind Amazon
MMAU v05.15.25 Not tested since Dec 2025
MMAU 7 leaders
MMAU v05.15.25 Not tested since Dec 2025

More in Audio and video

All 168 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%
  • TVBench In use Models answer multiple-choice questions on 10 temporal video tasks, such as action counting and ordering, that static frames cannot solve. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 81.9%