Benchmark Almanac

LongBench v2

Beam 1.0 66.9% leads since Oct 2026 In use

503 multiple-choice questions over 8K-2M-word contexts (QA, dialogue, code repos, structured data). Accuracy.

In the authors’ words

This paper introduces LongBench v2, a benchmark designed to assess the ability of LLMs to handle long-context problems requiring deep understanding and reasoning across real-world multitasks. LongBench v2 consists of 503 challenging multiple-choice questions, with contexts ranging from 8k to 2M words, across six major task categories: single-document QA, multi-document QA, long in-context learning, long-dialogue history understanding, code repository understanding, and long structured data understanding. To ensure the breadth and the practicality, we collect data from nearly 100 highly educated individuals with diverse professional backgrounds. We employ both automated and manual review processes to maintain high quality and difficulty, resulting in human experts achieving only 53.7% accuracy under a 15-minute time constraint. Our evaluation reveals that the best-performing model, when directly answers the questions, achieves only 50.1% accuracy. In contrast, the o1-preview model, which includes longer reasoning, achieves 57.7%, surpassing the human baseline by 4%. These results highlight the importance of enhanced reasoning ability and scaling inference-time compute to tackle the long-context challenges in LongBench v2. The project is available at https://longbench2.github.io.

Abstract of LongBench v2: Towards Deeper Understanding and Reasoning on Realistic Long-context Multitasks (arXiv:2412.15204, CC0)
Made by Tsinghua KEG / Zhipu Released Dec 2024 Reasoning over long documents All tasks public Last in a launch post Oct 2026 Last model added Oct 2026 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Multiple choice
27
Models scored in lab cards
20
Launch posts list it, from 11 labs
17
System cards report it, from 13 labs

Beam 1.0 leads with 66.9%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Beam 1.0 66.9%
  2. 2 Qwen 3.8 Max 66.3%
  3. 3 Tencent Hy3 preview 65.4%
  4. 4 GLM-5 64.5%
  5. 5 Seed2.0 Pro 63.8%
  6. 6 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 63.2%
  7. 7 Qwen 3.6 Plus 62%
  8. 8 Nemotron 3 Ultra 61.9%
  9. 9 MiniMax-M1-80k 61.5%
  10. 10 Kimi K2.5 61%
  11. 11 MAI-Thinking-1 61%
  12. 12 MiMo-V2-Flash 60.6%
  13. 13 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 60.2%
  14. 14 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 59.6%
  15. 15 Step 3.5 Flash 57.5%
  16. 16 MiniMax-Text-01 56.5%
  17. 17 Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct 55%
  18. 18 Spark-X2.6-4B 53.3%
  19. 19 DeepSeek-V4-Pro 51.5%
  20. 20 Kimi K2 Jul 2025 49.1%
  21. 21 DeepSeek-V3 48.7%
  22. 22 Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 48.7%
  23. 23 Ling-2.6-1T 48.3%
  24. 24 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 45.2%
  25. 25 Cohere Command A 43.4%
  26. 26 Nemotron-Cascade 2 30B-A3B 40.3%
  27. 27 Mistral Small 3.1 37.2%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Beam 1.0 66.9% Oct 2026 Model card
2 Qwen 3.8 Max 66.3% Aug 2026 Model card
3 Tencent Hy3 preview 65.4% Apr 2026 Model card
4 GLM-5 64.5% Feb 2026 Model card
5 Seed2.0 Pro 63.8% Feb 2026 Model card
6 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 63.2% Feb 2026 Model card
7 Qwen 3.6 Plus 62% Apr 2026 Model card
8 Nemotron 3 Ultra 61.9% Jun 2026 Model card
9 MiniMax-M1-80k 61.5% Jun 2025 Model card
10 Kimi K2.5 61% Jan 2026 Model card
11 MAI-Thinking-1 61% Jun 2026 Model card
12 MiMo-V2-Flash 60.6% Dec 2025 Model card
13 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 60.2% Feb 2026 Model card
14 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 59.6% Mar 2026 Model card
15 Step 3.5 Flash 57.5% Feb 2026 Model card
16 MiniMax-Text-01 56.5% Jan 2025 Model card
17 Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct 55% Jun 2025 Model card
18 Spark-X2.6-4B 53.3% Oct 2026 Model card
19 DeepSeek-V4-Pro 51.5% Apr 2026 Model card
20 Kimi K2 Jul 2025 49.1% Jul 2025 Model card
21 DeepSeek-V3 48.7% Dec 2024 Model card
22 Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 48.7% Oct 2026 Model card
23 Ling-2.6-1T 48.3% Jun 2026 Model card
24 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 45.2% Sep 2026 Model card
25 Cohere Command A 43.4% Apr 2025 Model card
26 Nemotron-Cascade 2 30B-A3B 40.3% Mar 2026 Model card
27 Mistral Small 3.1 37.2% Mar 2025 Model card

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 37 entries, 33 of them models we track. We plot every source in the charts below.

Scores at each effort level

Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.

Lowest effort to highest, light to dark
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct
CoT
58.3%
MiniMax-Text-01
CoT
56.5%
GPT-4o
CoT
51.4%
GPT-4o
CoT
51.2%
Gemini 2.0 Flash
CoT
51.1%
Qwen3-235B-A22B
CoT
50.1%
Qwen3-32B
CoT
49.2%
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024)
CoT
46.7%
Kimi K2
CoT
44.9%
Qwen2.5-72B
CoT
43.5%
Qwen3-30B-A3B
CoT
42.5%
Mistral Large 2
CoT
39.6%

3 models have held number one since its release in Dec 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

OpenAI DeepSeek Google DeepMind MiniMax ByteDance Seed Z.ai Tencent Qwen Reflection
Own leaderboard Not tested since Aug 2025
Lab claims 8 leaders
Beam 1.0 66.9%

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) Beam 1.0 Tencent Hy3 preview Gemini 2.5 Pro DeepSeek-R1 GPT-4o Llama 3.1-70B GLM-4-9B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) Beam 1.0 Gemini 2.5 Pro

5 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

DeepSeek
MiniMax
Mistral AI
Xiaomi Corp
Moonshot AI
ByteDance Seed
Qwen
NVIDIA
Tencent
Reflection
iFlytek
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
23 Oct 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 48.7 LongBench v2 (48K)
22 Oct 2026 Spark-X2.6-4B 53.3 LongBench v2
5 Oct 2026 Beam 1.0 66.9 LongBench v2
10 Sep 2026 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 45.2 LongBench-V2 (EM)
3 Aug 2026 Qwen 3.8 Max 66.3 LongBench v2
4 Jun 2026 Nemotron 3 Ultra 61.9 Longbench v2 (≤ 1M)
24 Apr 2026 DeepSeek-V4-Pro 51.5 LongBench-V2 (EM)
23 Apr 2026 Tencent Hy3 preview 65.4 LongBench v2
2 Apr 2026 Qwen 3.6 Plus 62 LongBench v2
30 Mar 2026 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 59.6 LongBench v2
19 Mar 2026 Nemotron-Cascade 2 30B-A3B 40.3 LongBench v2
24 Feb 2026 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 60.2 LongBench v2
16 Feb 2026 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 63.2 LongBench v2
14 Feb 2026 Seed2.0 Pro 63.8 LongBench v2 (128k)
27 Jan 2026 Kimi K2.5 61 Longbench v2
16 Dec 2025 MiMo-V2-Flash 60.6 LongBench V2
16 Jun 2025 MiniMax-M1-80k 61.5 LongBench-v2
17 Mar 2025 Mistral Small 3.1 37.2 LongBench v2
15 Jan 2025 MiniMax-Text-01 56.5 LongBench v2 (overall, w/ CoT)
26 Dec 2024 DeepSeek-V3 48.7 LongBench v2 (Acc.)

17 system cards report it, from 13 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
23 Oct 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B technical report 48.7 LongBench v2 (48K), released Q4_K_M imatrix checkpoint (Table 5). BF16 50.5 (Table 3) Capabilities
13 Jun 2026 Ling-2.6-1T technical report 48.3 LongBenchV2, accuracy (Table 5) Capabilities
9 Jun 2026 Nemotron 3 Ultra technical report 61.9 Longbench v2 (<= 1M) (Table 10) Capabilities
2 Jun 2026 MAI-Thinking-1 technical report 61 LongBenchV2, input limited to 256k tokens, 408 questions (Table 19) Capabilities
17 Apr 2026 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus technical report 59.6 LongBench v2 (Table 4) Capabilities
19 Mar 2026 Nemotron-Cascade 2 30B-A3B technical report 40.3 LongBench v2 (Table 1) Capabilities
17 Feb 2026 GLM-5 technical report 64.5 LongBench v2 (Table 7) Capabilities
14 Feb 2026 Seed2.0 Pro model card 63.8 LongBench v2 (128k) (Table 3) Capabilities
11 Feb 2026 Step 3.5 Flash technical report 57.5 LongBench v2 (Table 5). PaCoRe 62.0 Capabilities
30 Jan 2026 Kimi K2.5 technical report 61 LongBench v2, inputs truncated to about 128k (Table 4) Capabilities
6 Jan 2026 MiMo-V2-Flash technical report 60.6 LongBench V2 (Table 9) Capabilities
21 Jul 2025 Kimi K2 technical report 49.1 LongBench v2 (Acc.), 128K window (Table 3) Capabilities
26 Jun 2025 Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct technical report 55 LongBench-v2 (Table 5) Capabilities
16 Jun 2025 MiniMax-M1-80k technical report 61.5 LongBench-v2 (Table 2) Capabilities
1 Apr 2025 Cohere Command A technical report 43.4 LongBench-V2 Overall (Table 22) Capabilities
14 Jan 2025 MiniMax-Text-01 technical report 56.5 LongBench v2 overall, w/ CoT (Table 10). w/o CoT 52.9 Capabilities
26 Dec 2024 DeepSeek-V3 technical report 48.7 LongBench v2 (Acc.), DeepSeek-V3 (Table 6) Capabilities

Versions

We switch the top row to each new version when it comes out. Open it for one row per version. An old version stays in play while people still test it, so whoever first takes it past 85% gets credit for closing it out.

Z.ai OpenAI DeepSeek Google DeepMind ByteDance Seed Tencent Qwen Reflection
LongBench v2 9 leaders
Beam 1.0 66.9%
LongBench Not tested since Jul 2025
GLM-4 81.1%
LongBench v2 8 leaders
Beam 1.0 66.9%

More in Long context

All 66 in Long context
  • MRCR v2 In use Multi-round coreference: retrieve the n-th of several similar requests hidden in a long synthetic conversation, up to 1M tokens. Muse Spark 1.3 98.5%
  • GraphWalks In use A graph is given as an edge list in long context. The model answers BFS or parent queries, scored by F1. Claude Fable 5 100%
  • OpenAI MRCR v2 In use Models read a long synthetic chat that hides 2, 4 or 8 identical writing requests and must reproduce the response to the i-th one. Scored by mean string match ratio per context bin. K-EXAONE 2.0 94.4%
  • CL-bench In use Model must learn new knowledge from a supplied long context (rules, procedures, data) and solve tasks. Strict LLM-verified rubrics. GPT-5.4 27.9%
  • AA-LCR 1.1 In use Models answer 100 questions that need reasoning across sets of real documents of about 100K tokens. An LLM equality checker with a fixed system prompt compares each answer with the key. Step 5 Preview 88.3%
  • LOCA-Bench In use Agentic tasks whose environment state is scaled to grow context length while task semantics stay fixed. Success rate versus context length. GPT-5.2 21.3%