Benchmark Almanac

LOCA-Bench

GPT-5.2 21.3% leads since Feb 2026 In use

Agentic tasks whose environment state is scaled to grow context length while task semantics stay fixed. Success rate versus context length.

15 seed tasks adapted from Toolathlon. Tests context-management strategies as part of the agent.

In the authors’ words

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly capable of carrying out long-running, real-world tasks. However, as the amount of context grows, their reliability often deteriorates, a phenomenon known as "context rot". Existing long-context benchmarks primarily focus on single-step settings that evaluate a model's ability to retrieve information from a long snippet. In realistic scenarios, however, LLMs often need to act as agents that explore environments, follow instructions and plans, extract useful information, and predict correct actions under a dynamically growing context. To assess language agents in such settings, we introduce LOCA-bench (a benchmark for LOng-Context Agents). Given a task prompt, LOCA-bench leverages automated and scalable control of environment states to regulate the agent's context length. This design enables LOCA-bench to extend the context length potentially to infinity in a controlled way while keeping the underlying task semantics fixed. LOCA-bench evaluates language agents as a combination of models and scaffolds, including various context management strategies. While agent performance generally degrades as the environment states grow more complex, advanced context management techniques can substantially improve the overall success rate. We open-source LOCA-bench to provide a platform for evaluating models and scaffolds in long-context, agentic scenarios: https://github.com/hkust-nlp/LOCA-bench

Abstract of LOCA-bench: Benchmarking Language Agents Under Controllable and Extreme Context Growth (arXiv:2602.07962, CC0)
Made by HKUST NLP Released Feb 2026 Reasoning over long documents All tasks public Last in a launch post Oct 2026 Last model added Oct 2026 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
University Undergraduates and entry-level professionals
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
10
Entries on its own leaderboard, 9 models we track
2
Launch posts list it, from 1 lab

GPT-5.2 leads with 21.3% among models released by Feb 2026

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

The newest model with a score here came out in Feb 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 GPT-5.2 medium 21.3%
  2. 2 Gemini 3 Flash 20%
  3. 3 Claude Opus 4.5 14.7%
  4. 4 DeepSeek-V3.2 thinking 6.70%
  5. 5 MiniMax-M2.5 6.70%
  6. 6 GLM-4.7 5.30%
  7. 7 MiniMax-M2.1 5.30%
  8. 8 Kimi K2.5 4.00%
  9. 9 GLM-5 4.00%
  10. 10 K2 thinking 2.70%
#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-5.2 21.3% medium Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
2 Gemini 3 Flash 20% Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
3 Claude Opus 4.5 14.7% Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
4 DeepSeek-V3.2 6.70% thinking Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
5 MiniMax-M2.5 6.70% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
6 GLM-4.7 5.30% Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
7 MiniMax-M2.1 5.30% Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
8 Kimi K2.5 4.00% Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
9 GLM-5 4.00% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
10 K2 2.70% thinking Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 2 models in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI
Own leaderboard Not tested since Feb 2026
GPT-5.2 21.3%

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) MiniMax-M3.1-Flash MiniMax-M3 GPT-5.2 Claude Opus 4.5 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) MiniMax-M3.1-Flash MiniMax-M3

One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

MiniMax
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
19 Oct 2026 MiniMax-M3.1-Flash 60.3 LOCA-Bench 256K
1 Jun 2026 MiniMax-M3 49.3 LOCA-Bench (256k)

More in Long context

All 66 in Long context
  • MRCR v2 In use Multi-round coreference: retrieve the n-th of several similar requests hidden in a long synthetic conversation, up to 1M tokens. Muse Spark 1.3 98.5%
  • LongBench v2 In use 503 multiple-choice questions over 8K-2M-word contexts (QA, dialogue, code repos, structured data). Accuracy. Beam 1.0 66.9%
  • GraphWalks In use A graph is given as an edge list in long context. The model answers BFS or parent queries, scored by F1. Claude Fable 5 100%
  • OpenAI MRCR v2 In use Models read a long synthetic chat that hides 2, 4 or 8 identical writing requests and must reproduce the response to the i-th one. Scored by mean string match ratio per context bin. K-EXAONE 2.0 94.4%
  • CL-bench In use Model must learn new knowledge from a supplied long context (rules, procedures, data) and solve tasks. Strict LLM-verified rubrics. GPT-5.4 27.9%
  • AA-LCR 1.1 In use Models answer 100 questions that need reasoning across sets of real documents of about 100K tokens. An LLM equality checker with a fixed system prompt compares each answer with the key. Step 5 Preview 88.3%