BALROG
Agentic reasoning on games (NetHack, Crafter, BabyAI, MiniHack...) for LLMs and VLMs.
In the authors’ words
Large Language Models (LLMs) and Vision Language Models (VLMs) possess extensive knowledge and exhibit promising reasoning abilities, however, they still struggle to perform well in complex, dynamic environments. Real-world tasks require handling intricate interactions, advanced spatial reasoning, long-term planning, and continuous exploration of new strategies-areas in which we lack effective methodologies for comprehensively evaluating these capabilities. To address this gap, we introduce BALROG, a novel benchmark designed to assess the agentic capabilities of LLMs and VLMs through a diverse set of challenging games. Our benchmark incorporates a range of existing reinforcement learning environments with varying levels of difficulty, including tasks that are solvable by non-expert humans in seconds to extremely challenging ones that may take years to master (e.g., the NetHack Learning Environment). We devise fine-grained metrics to measure performance and conduct an extensive evaluation of several popular open-source and closed-source LLMs and VLMs. Our findings indicate that while current models achieve partial success in the easier games, they struggle significantly with more challenging tasks. Notably, we observe severe deficiencies in vision-based decision-making, as several models perform worse when visual representations of the environments are provided. We release BALROG as an open and user-friendly benchmark to facilitate future research and development in the agentic community. Code and Leaderboard at balrogai.com.
- Level
- Everyday Most adults, without training
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
GPT-6 Astra leads with 68.3% among models released by Sep 2026
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
The newest model with a score here came out in Sep 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- Claude Sonnet 5.5
- and 12 more
- 68.3 GPT-6 Astra
- 63.4 Claude Opus 5
- 60.0 GPT-5.6 Sol
- 58.1
Gemini 3 Pro
- 57.0
Gemini 3.1 Pro
- 53.2 GPT-5.6 Terra
- 48.1
Gemini 3 Flash
- 45.6 GPT-5.6 Luna
- 43.6 Grok 4
- 43.5 Claude Opus 4.5
- 43.3
Gemini 2.5 Pro
- 34.9
DeepSeek-R1
- 33.5
Gemini 2.5 Flash
- 32.8 GPT-5-minimal-think
- 32.6 Claude 3.5 Sonnet
- 32.3 GPT-4o
- 31.2 Claude Haiku 4.5
- 29.5 Grok 3
- 29.2 Reka Flash 3
- 27.9
Llama 3.1-70B
- 27.3
Llama 3.2 90B
- 23.0
Llama 3.3 70B
- 21.0
Gemini 1.5 Pro
- 19.5
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B
- 19.3 Claude 3.5 Haiku
- 17.6
Mistral NeMo
- 17.4 GPT-4o mini
- 16.8
Llama 3.2 11B
- 16.2
Qwen2.5-72B
- 15.1
Llama 3.1-8B
- 14.6
Gemini 1.5 Flash
- 12.8 Qwen2-VL-72B
- 11.6
Phi-4
- 10.1
Llama 3.2 3B
- 7.80
Qwen2.5-7B
- 6.60
Llama 3.2 1B
- 3.70 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct
- 1 GPT-6 Astra max 68.3%
- 2 Claude Opus 5 max 63.4%
- 3 GPT-5.6 Sol max 60%
- 4
Gemini 3 Pro 58.1%
- 5
Gemini 3.1 Pro thinking 57%
- 6 GPT-5.6 Terra max 53.2%
- 7
Gemini 3 Flash 48.1%
- 8 GPT-5.6 Luna max 45.6%
- 9 Grok 4 43.6%
- 10 Claude Opus 4.5 43.5%
- 11
Gemini 2.5 Pro Mar 2025 43.3%
- 12
DeepSeek-R1 34.9%
- 13
Gemini 2.5 Flash Jun 2025 33.5%
- 14 GPT-5-minimal-think 32.8%
- 15 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 32.6%
- 16 GPT-4o May 2024 32.3%
- 17 Claude Haiku 4.5 31.2%
- 18 Grok 3 29.5%
- 19 Reka Flash 3 29.2%
- 20
Llama 3.1-70B 27.9%
- 21
Llama 3.2 90B 27.3%
- 22
Llama 3.3 70B 23%
- 23
Gemini 1.5 Pro Sep 2024 21%
- 24
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B 19.5%
- 25 Claude 3.5 Haiku 19.3%
- 26
Mistral NeMo 17.6%
- 27 GPT-4o mini 17.4%
- 28
Llama 3.2 11B 16.8%
- 29
Qwen2.5-72B 16.2%
- 30
Llama 3.1-8B 15.1%
- 31
Gemini 1.5 Flash Sep 2024 14.6%
- 32 Qwen2-VL-72B 12.8%
- 33
Phi-4 11.6%
- 34
Llama 3.2 3B 10.1%
- 35
Qwen2.5-7B 7.80%
- 36
Llama 3.2 1B 6.60%
- 37 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct 3.70%
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-6 Astra | 68.3% | max | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | Claude Opus 5 | 63.4% | max | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 60% | max | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | | 58.1% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | | 57% | thinking | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | GPT-5.6 Terra | 53.2% | max | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | | 48.1% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | GPT-5.6 Luna | 45.6% | max | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | Grok 4 | 43.6% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | Claude Opus 4.5 | 43.5% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | | 43.3% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | | 34.9% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | | 33.5% | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | GPT-5-minimal-think | 32.8% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | 32.6% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | GPT-4o May 2024 | 32.3% | May 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | Claude Haiku 4.5 | 31.2% | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | Grok 3 | 29.5% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | Reka Flash 3 | 29.2% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | | 27.9% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | | 27.3% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | | 23% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | | 21% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 24 | | 19.5% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 25 | Claude 3.5 Haiku | 19.3% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 26 | | 17.6% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 27 | GPT-4o mini | 17.4% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 28 | | 16.8% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 29 | | 16.2% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 30 | | 15.1% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 31 | | 14.6% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 32 | Qwen2-VL-72B | 12.8% | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 33 | | 11.6% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 34 | | 10.1% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 35 | | 7.80% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 36 | | 6.60% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 37 | Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct | 3.70% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard |
Epoch AI has scores for 37 models. We plot every source in the charts below.
8 models have held number one since its release in Nov 2024
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and Epoch AI’s runs.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Games and long tasks
- ARC-AGI-3 In use Interactive game environments where agents must explore, infer goals and rules, and act efficiently without instructions. GPT-6 Astra 100%
- MineDojo Fading Agents complete open-ended tasks in Minecraft, such as mining blocks and fighting mobs, from a large simulation suite. Programmatic checks score many tasks.
Seed2.0 Pro 49%
- Orak Fading LLM agents play 12 popular video games across most genres through an MCP interface. Scores come from in-game progress or outcomes per title.
Nemotron 3 Nano 4B 22.9
- GameWorld Only in system cards Multimodal game agents play 34 browser games across 170 tasks. Outcomes are checked from the game state.
Gemini 3 Flash 41.9%
- Swarm Bench Only in system cards Models orchestrate agent swarms on complex tasks that benefit from coordinated decomposition and parallel execution. Kimi K3 76.3%
- TextQuests Only in system cards Agents play 25 classic interactive fiction games. Measures game progress and harmful actions per 100 steps.
Muse Spark 2.40