Benchmark Almanac

BALROG

GPT-6 Astra 68.3% leads since Sep 2026 Not in model cards

Agentic reasoning on games (NetHack, Crafter, BabyAI, MiniHack...) for LLMs and VLMs.

In the authors’ words

Large Language Models (LLMs) and Vision Language Models (VLMs) possess extensive knowledge and exhibit promising reasoning abilities, however, they still struggle to perform well in complex, dynamic environments. Real-world tasks require handling intricate interactions, advanced spatial reasoning, long-term planning, and continuous exploration of new strategies-areas in which we lack effective methodologies for comprehensively evaluating these capabilities. To address this gap, we introduce BALROG, a novel benchmark designed to assess the agentic capabilities of LLMs and VLMs through a diverse set of challenging games. Our benchmark incorporates a range of existing reinforcement learning environments with varying levels of difficulty, including tasks that are solvable by non-expert humans in seconds to extremely challenging ones that may take years to master (e.g., the NetHack Learning Environment). We devise fine-grained metrics to measure performance and conduct an extensive evaluation of several popular open-source and closed-source LLMs and VLMs. Our findings indicate that while current models achieve partial success in the easier games, they struggle significantly with more challenging tasks. Notably, we observe severe deficiencies in vision-based decision-making, as several models perform worse when visual representations of the environments are provided. We release BALROG as an open and user-friendly benchmark to facilitate future research and development in the agentic community. Code and Leaderboard at balrogai.com.

Abstract of BALROG: Benchmarking Agentic LLM and VLM Reasoning On Games (arXiv:2411.13543, CC0)
Made by UCL DARK et al. Released Nov 2024 Video games All tasks public Last model added Sep 2026 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
37
Entries on its own leaderboard, 35 models we track

GPT-6 Astra leads with 68.3% among models released by Sep 2026

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

The newest model with a score here came out in Sep 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 GPT-6 Astra max 68.3%
  2. 2 Claude Opus 5 max 63.4%
  3. 3 GPT-5.6 Sol max 60%
  4. 4 Gemini 3 Pro 58.1%
  5. 5 Gemini 3.1 Pro thinking 57%
  6. 6 GPT-5.6 Terra max 53.2%
  7. 7 Gemini 3 Flash 48.1%
  8. 8 GPT-5.6 Luna max 45.6%
  9. 9 Grok 4 43.6%
  10. 10 Claude Opus 4.5 43.5%
  11. 11 Gemini 2.5 Pro Mar 2025 43.3%
  12. 12 DeepSeek-R1 34.9%
  13. 13 Gemini 2.5 Flash Jun 2025 33.5%
  14. 14 GPT-5-minimal-think 32.8%
  15. 15 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 32.6%
  16. 16 GPT-4o May 2024 32.3%
  17. 17 Claude Haiku 4.5 31.2%
  18. 18 Grok 3 29.5%
  19. 19 Reka Flash 3 29.2%
  20. 20 Llama 3.1-70B 27.9%
  21. 21 Llama 3.2 90B 27.3%
  22. 22 Llama 3.3 70B 23%
  23. 23 Gemini 1.5 Pro Sep 2024 21%
  24. 24 DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B 19.5%
  25. 25 Claude 3.5 Haiku 19.3%
  26. 26 Mistral NeMo 17.6%
  27. 27 GPT-4o mini 17.4%
  28. 28 Llama 3.2 11B 16.8%
  29. 29 Qwen2.5-72B 16.2%
  30. 30 Llama 3.1-8B 15.1%
  31. 31 Gemini 1.5 Flash Sep 2024 14.6%
  32. 32 Qwen2-VL-72B 12.8%
  33. 33 Phi-4 11.6%
  34. 34 Llama 3.2 3B 10.1%
  35. 35 Qwen2.5-7B 7.80%
  36. 36 Llama 3.2 1B 6.60%
  37. 37 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct 3.70%
#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-6 Astra 68.3% max Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Claude Opus 5 63.4% max Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
3 GPT-5.6 Sol 60% max Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Gemini 3 Pro 58.1% Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
5 Gemini 3.1 Pro 57% thinking Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
6 GPT-5.6 Terra 53.2% max Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
7 Gemini 3 Flash 48.1% Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
8 GPT-5.6 Luna 45.6% max Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
9 Grok 4 43.6% Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
10 Claude Opus 4.5 43.5% Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
11 Gemini 2.5 Pro Mar 2025 43.3% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
12 DeepSeek-R1 34.9% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
13 Gemini 2.5 Flash Jun 2025 33.5% Jun 2025 Official leaderboard
14 GPT-5-minimal-think 32.8% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
15 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 32.6% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
16 GPT-4o May 2024 32.3% May 2024 Official leaderboard
17 Claude Haiku 4.5 31.2% Oct 2025 Official leaderboard
18 Grok 3 29.5% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
19 Reka Flash 3 29.2% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
20 Llama 3.1-70B 27.9% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
21 Llama 3.2 90B 27.3% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
22 Llama 3.3 70B 23% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
23 Gemini 1.5 Pro Sep 2024 21% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
24 DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B 19.5% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
25 Claude 3.5 Haiku 19.3% Oct 2024 Official leaderboard
26 Mistral NeMo 17.6% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
27 GPT-4o mini 17.4% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
28 Llama 3.2 11B 16.8% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
29 Qwen2.5-72B 16.2% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
30 Llama 3.1-8B 15.1% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
31 Gemini 1.5 Flash Sep 2024 14.6% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
32 Qwen2-VL-72B 12.8% Nov 2024 Official leaderboard
33 Phi-4 11.6% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
34 Llama 3.2 3B 10.1% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
35 Qwen2.5-7B 7.80% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
36 Llama 3.2 1B 6.60% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
37 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct 3.70% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard

Epoch AI has scores for 37 models. We plot every source in the charts below.

8 models have held number one since its release in Nov 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and Epoch AI’s runs.

Anthropic DeepSeek Google DeepMind xAI OpenAI
Own leaderboard Not tested since Sep 2026
GPT-6 Astra 68.3%
Epoch AI runs Not tested since Sep 2026
GPT-6 Astra 68.3%

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Run or collected by Epoch AI Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-6 Astra Claude Opus 5 Gemini 3 Pro Grok 4 DeepSeek-R1 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-6 Astra GPT-5.6 Sol

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Games and long tasks

All 68 in Games and long tasks
  • ARC-AGI-3 In use Interactive game environments where agents must explore, infer goals and rules, and act efficiently without instructions. GPT-6 Astra 100%
  • MineDojo Fading Agents complete open-ended tasks in Minecraft, such as mining blocks and fighting mobs, from a large simulation suite. Programmatic checks score many tasks. Seed2.0 Pro 49%
  • Orak Fading LLM agents play 12 popular video games across most genres through an MCP interface. Scores come from in-game progress or outcomes per title. Nemotron 3 Nano 4B 22.9
  • GameWorld Only in system cards Multimodal game agents play 34 browser games across 170 tasks. Outcomes are checked from the game state. Gemini 3 Flash 41.9%
  • Swarm Bench Only in system cards Models orchestrate agent swarms on complex tasks that benefit from coordinated decomposition and parallel execution. Kimi K3 76.3%
  • TextQuests Only in system cards Agents play 25 classic interactive fiction games. Measures game progress and harmful actions per 100 steps. Muse Spark 2.40