Benchmark Almanac

ARC-AGI-3

GPT-6 Astra 100% leads since Sep 2026 In use

Interactive game environments where agents must explore, infer goals and rules, and act efficiently without instructions.

Scores depend on the harness. ARC Prize reports GPT-6 Astra at 62.7 percent with its Standard harness and 99.9 percent with a Provider Adapter harness. A six-game preview ran from July 2025.

In the authors’ words

We introduce ARC-AGI-3, an interactive benchmark for studying agentic intelligence through novel, abstract, turn-based environments in which agents must explore, infer goals, build internal models of environment dynamics, and plan effective action sequences without explicit instructions. Like its predecessors ARC-AGI-1 and 2, ARC-AGI-3 focuses entirely on evaluating fluid adaptive efficiency on novel tasks, while avoiding language and external knowledge. ARC-AGI-3 environments only leverage Core Knowledge priors and are difficulty-calibrated via extensive testing with human test-takers. Our testing shows humans can solve 100% of the environments, in contrast to frontier AI systems which, as of March 2026, score below 1%. In this paper, we present the benchmark design, its efficiency-based scoring framework grounded in human action baselines, and the methodology used to construct, validate, and calibrate the environments.

Abstract of ARC-AGI-3: A New Challenge for Frontier Agentic Intelligence (arXiv:2603.24621, CC0)
Made by ARC Prize Foundation Released Mar 2026 Puzzles and chess Public tasks plus a private test set Last in a launch post Sep 2026 Last model added Oct 2026 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
24
Models scored on its own leaderboard
4
Launch posts list it, from 2 labs
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

GPT-6 Astra leads with 100%

Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart.

  1. 1 GPT-6 Astra high 100%
  2. 2 Gemini 4 Argon low 97.5%
  3. 3 GPT-6.1 Sol xhigh 96.4%
  4. 4 Claude Sonnet 5.5 xhigh 72.4%
  5. 5 Gemini 3.8 Flash high 35%
  6. 6 Claude Opus 5 high 30.2%
  7. 7 GPT-6 Sol max 23%
  8. 8 Grok 4.7 high 10.1%
  9. 9 GPT-5.6 Sol max 7.78%
  10. 10 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash low 3.26%
  11. 11 Claude Haiku 5.5 max 2.82%
  12. 12 Grok 4.6 xhigh 2.11%
  13. 13 Claude Opus 4.8 high 1.52%
  14. 14 GPT-5.6 Terra max 0.80%
  15. 15 GPT-6 Luna max 0.59%
  16. 16 Claude Opus 4.6 max 0.51%
  17. 17 GPT-5.5 high 0.43%
  18. 18 Gemini 3.1 Pro 0.42%
  19. 19 Muse Spark Open xhigh 0.42%
  20. 20 Grok 4.5 medium 0.32%
  21. 21 GPT-5.4 high 0.21%
  22. 22 Claude Opus 4.7 high 0.18%
  23. 23 GPT-5.6 Luna max 0.18%
  24. 24 Grok 4.20 beta 0.09%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-6 Astra 100% high, Provider Adapter Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Gemini 4 Argon 97.5% low, Provider Adapter Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
3 GPT-6.1 Sol 96.4% xhigh, Provider Adapter Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Claude Sonnet 5.5 72.4% xhigh, Provider Adapter Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Gemini 3.8 Flash 35% high, Provider Adapter Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Claude Opus 5 30.2% high, standard Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
7 GPT-6 Sol 23% max, Provider Adapter Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
8 Grok 4.7 10.1% high, Provider Adapter Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
9 GPT-5.6 Sol 7.78% max, standard Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
10 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3.26% low, Provider Adapter Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
11 Claude Haiku 5.5 2.82% max, Provider Adapter Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
12 Grok 4.6 2.11% xhigh, standard Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
13 Claude Opus 4.8 1.52% high, standard May 2026 Official leaderboard
14 GPT-5.6 Terra 0.80% max, standard Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
15 GPT-6 Luna 0.59% max, Provider Adapter Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
16 Claude Opus 4.6 0.51% max, standard Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
17 GPT-5.5 0.43% high, standard Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
18 Gemini 3.1 Pro 0.42% standard Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
19 Muse Spark Open 0.42% xhigh, Provider Adapter Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
20 Grok 4.5 0.32% medium, standard Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
21 GPT-5.4 0.21% high, standard Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
22 Claude Opus 4.7 0.18% high, standard Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
23 GPT-5.6 Luna 0.18% max, standard Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
24 Grok 4.20 0.09% beta, standard Feb 2026 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 4 models in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.

More effort adds a median 4 points

Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.

Lowest effort to highest, light to dark
GPT-6 Astra Provider Adapter
none
100%
Gemini 4 Argon Provider Adapter
low
97.5%
GPT-6.1 Sol Provider Adapter
low medium
96.4%
Claude Sonnet 5.5 Provider Adapter
low high xhigh
72.4%
GPT-6 Astra standard
none low medium high max
62.7%
GPT-6.1 Sol standard
low high xhigh max
52.7%
Gemini 4 Argon standard
low
49.8%
Gemini 3.8 Flash Provider Adapter
low medium high
35%
Claude Sonnet 5.5 standard
low xhigh
24.3%
GPT-6 Sol Provider Adapter
none xhigh max
23%
Gemini 3.8 Flash standard
low
10.4%
Grok 4.7 Provider Adapter
low medium
10.1%
ModelEffortHarnessScoreCost per taskOutput tokens
GPT-6 Astra high Provider Adapter 100%
GPT-6 Astra max Provider Adapter 98.5%
GPT-6 Astra xhigh Provider Adapter 98.4%
GPT-6 Astra medium Provider Adapter 98.4%
GPT-6 Astra low Provider Adapter 98%
Gemini 4 Argon low Provider Adapter 97.5%
Gemini 4 Argon medium Provider Adapter 97.3%
Gemini 4 Argon high Provider Adapter 97.3%
GPT-6 Astra none Provider Adapter 96.7%
GPT-6.1 Sol xhigh Provider Adapter 96.4%
GPT-6.1 Sol max Provider Adapter 96.2%
GPT-6.1 Sol high Provider Adapter 95%
GPT-6.1 Sol medium Provider Adapter 91%
GPT-6.1 Sol low Provider Adapter 82.8%
Claude Sonnet 5.5 xhigh Provider Adapter 72.4%
GPT-6 Astra max standard 62.7%
GPT-6 Astra xhigh standard 59.3%
GPT-6 Astra high standard 54.8%
GPT-6.1 Sol max standard 52.7%
Gemini 4 Argon low standard 49.8%
Gemini 4 Argon medium standard 46.3%
GPT-6.1 Sol xhigh standard 39.9%
GPT-6 Astra medium standard 38.6%
Claude Sonnet 5.5 high Provider Adapter 35.5%
GPT-6 Astra none standard 35.2%
Gemini 3.8 Flash high Provider Adapter 35%
Claude Opus 5 high standard 30.2%
GPT-6.1 Sol high standard 26.7%
Claude Sonnet 5.5 xhigh standard 24.3%
Gemini 3.8 Flash medium Provider Adapter 24.2%
GPT-6 Sol max Provider Adapter 23%
GPT-6 Astra low standard 17.4%
Gemini 3.8 Flash low Provider Adapter 15.1%
GPT-6.1 Sol medium standard 10.6%
Gemini 3.8 Flash high standard 10.4%
Grok 4.7 high Provider Adapter 10.1%
GPT-6 Sol xhigh Provider Adapter 9.45%
Grok 4.7 medium Provider Adapter 8.37%
GPT-5.6 Sol max standard 7.78%
Grok 4.7 xhigh Provider Adapter 7.02%
GPT-5.6 Sol xhigh standard 6.99%
Gemini 3.8 Flash low standard 5.99%
GPT-6 Sol high Provider Adapter 5.86%
GPT-6 Sol medium Provider Adapter 4.93%
Claude Sonnet 5.5 medium Provider Adapter 4.89%
GPT-6 Sol max standard 4.62%
Gemini 3.8 Flash medium standard 3.99%
GPT-6.1 Sol low standard 3.92%
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash low Provider Adapter 3.26%
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash high Provider Adapter 3.15%
Claude Haiku 5.5 max Provider Adapter 2.82%
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash max Provider Adapter 2.68%
GPT-5.6 Sol high standard 2.15%
Grok 4.6 xhigh standard 2.11%
Grok 4.7 xhigh standard 1.82%
GPT-6 Sol xhigh standard 1.80%
GPT-6 Sol low Provider Adapter 1.76%
Grok 4.7 high standard 1.73%
Grok 4.7 medium standard 1.71%
Claude Opus 4.8 high standard 1.52%
GPT-6 Sol none Provider Adapter 1.21%
Claude Sonnet 5.5 high standard 1.20%
GPT-5.6 Sol medium standard 1.07%
GPT-6 Sol high standard 0.90%
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash max standard 0.85%
GPT-5.6 Terra max standard 0.80%
Grok 4.7 low Provider Adapter 0.77%
GPT-5.6 Terra xhigh standard 0.65%
Claude Sonnet 5.5 low Provider Adapter 0.62%
GPT-6 Luna max Provider Adapter 0.59%
Claude Opus 4.6 max standard 0.51%
GPT-6 Luna xhigh Provider Adapter 0.51%
GPT-5.6 Terra high standard 0.49%
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash high standard 0.48%
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash none Provider Adapter 0.48%
Claude Haiku 5.5 max standard 0.45%
GPT-5.5 high standard 0.43%
Gemini 3.1 Pro standard 0.42%
GPT-6 Sol medium standard 0.42%
Muse Spark Open xhigh Provider Adapter 0.42%
Claude Sonnet 5.5 low standard 0.40%
Claude Sonnet 5.5 medium standard 0.40%
GPT-6 Luna high Provider Adapter 0.38%
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash low standard 0.35%
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash none standard 0.34%
GPT-5.6 Sol low standard 0.33%
Grok 4.5 medium standard 0.32%
GPT-6 Luna medium Provider Adapter 0.32%
Grok 4.5 high standard 0.30%
GPT-6 Sol none standard 0.28%
Grok 4.5 low standard 0.26%
Grok 4.7 low standard 0.25%
GPT-6 Luna low Provider Adapter 0.24%
GPT-5.4 high standard 0.21%
GPT-6 Luna medium standard 0.19%
GPT-6 Luna high standard 0.18%
Claude Opus 4.7 high standard 0.18%
GPT-5.6 Luna max standard 0.18%
GPT-5.6 Luna low standard 0.17%
GPT-5.6 Luna medium standard 0.17%
GPT-6 Luna xhigh standard 0.16%
Muse Spark Open xhigh standard 0.14%
GPT-6 Sol low standard 0.13%
GPT-6 Luna max standard 0.10%
GPT-5.6 Luna high standard 0.10%
Grok 4.20 beta standard 0.09%
GPT-5.6 Terra medium standard 0.08%
GPT-6 Luna none Provider Adapter 0.05%
GPT-6 Luna low standard 0.03%
GPT-6 Luna none standard 0.03%
GPT-5.6 Luna xhigh standard 0.02%
GPT-5.6 Terra low standard 0.01%

6 models have held number one since its release in Mar 2026

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

Anthropic OpenAI Google DeepMind
Own leaderboard Passed 85% in Sep 2026, by GPT-6 Astra
Lab claims Passed 85% in Sep 2026, by GPT-6 Astra
GPT-6 Astra 99.9%

The best score passed 85% in Sep 2026

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-6 Astra Gemini 3.8 Flash Claude Opus 5 GPT-5.6 Sol Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.6 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-6 Astra Gemini 3.8 Flash

2 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

OpenAI
Anthropic
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
3 Sep 2026 GPT-6 Astra 99.9 ARC-AGI-3 (responses API harness)
24 Jul 2026 Claude Opus 5 30.2 Novel problem-solving ARC-AGI-3 (high)
9 Jul 2026 GPT-5.6 Luna 0.18 ARC-AGI-3
9 Jul 2026 GPT-5.6 Terra 0.8 ARC-AGI-3

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
24 Jul 2026 Claude Opus 5 system card 30.2 ARC-AGI-3 semi-private set, RHAE score 30.16% at high effort, max effort not available at release, verified by ARC Prize Foundation (Table 8.1.A, 8.14.2) Capabilities

Versions

We switch the top row to each new version when it comes out. Open it for one row per version. An old version stays in play while people still test it, so whoever first takes it past 85% gets credit for closing it out.

OpenAI ByteDance Seed xAI Anthropic Google DeepMind
ARC-AGI-3 Passed 85% in Sep 2026, by GPT-6 Astra
ARC-AGI Passed 85% in Dec 2025, by GPT-5.2
ARC-AGI-2 Passed 85% in Apr 2026, by GPT-5.5
ARC-AGI-3 Passed 85% in Sep 2026, by GPT-6 Astra

More in Games and long tasks

All 68 in Games and long tasks
  • MineDojo Fading Agents complete open-ended tasks in Minecraft, such as mining blocks and fighting mobs, from a large simulation suite. Programmatic checks score many tasks. Seed2.0 Pro 49%
  • Orak Fading LLM agents play 12 popular video games across most genres through an MCP interface. Scores come from in-game progress or outcomes per title. Nemotron 3 Nano 4B 22.9
  • GameWorld Only in system cards Multimodal game agents play 34 browser games across 170 tasks. Outcomes are checked from the game state. Gemini 3 Flash 41.9%
  • Swarm Bench Only in system cards Models orchestrate agent swarms on complex tasks that benefit from coordinated decomposition and parallel execution. Kimi K3 76.3%
  • TextQuests Only in system cards Agents play 25 classic interactive fiction games. Measures game progress and harmful actions per 100 steps. Muse Spark 2.40
  • Anthropic large agent teams tasks Only in system cards Internal 24-hour tasks for teams of 1-100 agents: build a company knowledge base, or formalize a theorem in Lean.