Benchmark Almanac

GameWorld

Gemini 3 Flash 41.9% leads since Apr 2026 Only in system cards

Multimodal game agents play 34 browser games across 170 tasks. Outcomes are checked from the game state.

63 HF paper upvotes. A Fine-Control Protocol release in 2026-08 adds higher-frequency control.

In the authors’ words

Towards an embodied generalist for real-world interaction, Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) agents still suffer from challenging latency, sparse feedback, and irreversible mistakes. Video games offer an ideal testbed with rich visual observations and closed-loop interaction, demanding fine-grained perception, long-horizon planning, and precise control. However, systematically evaluating these capabilities is currently hindered by heterogeneous action interfaces and heuristic verification. To this end, we introduce GameWorld, a benchmark designed for standardized and verifiable evaluation of MLLMs as generalist game agents in browser environments. Two game agent interfaces are studied: (i) computer-use agents that directly emit keyboard and mouse controls, and (ii) generalist multimodal agents that act in a semantic action space via deterministic Semantic Action Parsing. GameWorld contains 34 diverse games and 170 tasks, each paired with state-verifiable metrics for outcome-based evaluation. The results across 18 model-interface pairs suggest that even the best performing agent is far from achieving human capabilities on video games. Extensive experiments of repeated full-benchmark reruns demonstrate the robustness of the benchmark, while further studies on real-time interaction, context-memory sensitivity, and action validity expose more challenges ahead for game agents. Together, by offering a standardized, verifiable, and reproducible evaluation framework, GameWorld lays a robust foundation for advancing research on multimodal game agents and beyond. The project page is at https://gameworld-bench.github.io.

Abstract of GameWorld: Towards Standardized and Verifiable Evaluation of Multimodal Game Agents (arXiv:2604.07429, CC0)
Made by GameWorld project Released Apr 2026 Video games All tasks public Last in a system card Jun 2026 Last model added Jun 2026 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
13
Entries on its own leaderboard, 12 models we track
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

Gemini 3 Flash leads with 41.9% among models released by Feb 2026

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

The newest model with a score here came out in Feb 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Gemini 3 Flash 41.9%
  2. 2 GPT-5.2 40.6%
  3. 3 Seed1.8 39.8%
  4. 4 Claude Sonnet 4.6 39.3%
  5. 5 Kimi K2.5 37.4%
  6. 6 Gemini 2.5 Computer Use 36.1%
  7. 7 Grok 4.1 Fast reasoning 36%
  8. 8 computer-use-preview-2025-03-11 35.8%
  9. 9 Qwen3-VL-Plus 35.4%
  10. 10 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 31.4%
  11. 11 UI-TARS-1.5 31.1%
  12. 12 Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B 30.8%
  13. 13 GLM-4.6V 30.8%
#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini 3 Flash 41.9% Generalist interface Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
2 GPT-5.2 40.6% Generalist interface Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
3 Seed1.8 39.8% Computer-use interface Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
4 Claude Sonnet 4.6 39.3% Generalist interface Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Kimi K2.5 37.4% Generalist interface Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Gemini 2.5 Computer Use 36.1% Computer-use interface Oct 2025 Official leaderboard
7 Grok 4.1 Fast 36% reasoning, Generalist interface Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
8 computer-use-preview-2025-03-11 35.8% Computer-use interface Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
9 Qwen3-VL-Plus 35.4% Generalist interface Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
10 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 31.4% Computer-use interface Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
11 UI-TARS-1.5 31.1% Computer-use interface Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
12 Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B 30.8% Computer-use interface Official leaderboard
13 GLM-4.6V 30.8% Generalist interface Dec 2025 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Google DeepMind
Own leaderboard Not tested since Apr 2026

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Gemini 3 Flash Gemini 2.5 Computer Use computer-use-preview-2025-03-11 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Gemini 3 Flash

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
23 Jun 2026 Seed2.1 Pro model card 31.2 GameWorld (Table 4) Capabilities

More in Games and long tasks

All 68 in Games and long tasks
  • ARC-AGI-3 In use Interactive game environments where agents must explore, infer goals and rules, and act efficiently without instructions. GPT-6 Astra 100%
  • MineDojo Fading Agents complete open-ended tasks in Minecraft, such as mining blocks and fighting mobs, from a large simulation suite. Programmatic checks score many tasks. Seed2.0 Pro 49%
  • Orak Fading LLM agents play 12 popular video games across most genres through an MCP interface. Scores come from in-game progress or outcomes per title. Nemotron 3 Nano 4B 22.9
  • Swarm Bench Only in system cards Models orchestrate agent swarms on complex tasks that benefit from coordinated decomposition and parallel execution. Kimi K3 76.3%
  • TextQuests Only in system cards Agents play 25 classic interactive fiction games. Measures game progress and harmful actions per 100 steps. Muse Spark 2.40
  • Anthropic large agent teams tasks Only in system cards Internal 24-hour tasks for teams of 1-100 agents: build a company knowledge base, or formalize a theorem in Lean.