Benchmark Almanac

YouCook2

Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 188.3 leads since Jul 2025 Dropped

Models describe the procedure steps in YouTube cooking videos. Scored by CIDEr against human step captions.

In the authors’ words

The potential for agents, whether embodied or software, to learn by observing other agents performing procedures involving objects and actions is rich. Current research on automatic procedure learning heavily relies on action labels or video subtitles, even during the evaluation phase, which makes them infeasible in real-world scenarios. This leads to our question: can the human-consensus structure of a procedure be learned from a large set of long, unconstrained videos (e.g., instructional videos from YouTube) with only visual evidence? To answer this question, we introduce the problem of procedure segmentation–to segment a video procedure into category-independent procedure segments. Given that no large-scale dataset is available for this problem, we collect a large-scale procedure segmentation dataset with procedure segments temporally localized and described; we use cooking videos and name the dataset YouCook2. We propose a segment-level recurrent network for generating procedure segments by modeling the dependencies across segments. The generated segments can be used as pre-processing for other tasks, such as dense video captioning and event parsing. We show in our experiments that the proposed model outperforms competitive baselines in procedure segmentation.

Abstract of Towards Automatic Learning of Procedures from Web Instructional Videos (arXiv:1703.09788, CC0)
Made by University of Michigan Released Mar 2017 Video captioning All tasks public Last in a launch post May 2024 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Jul 2025
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Open-ended Free-form text, documents, designs or media judged as a whole.
4
Models scored in lab cards
2
Launch posts list it, from 1 lab
2
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Gemini 2.5 Pro leads with 188.3 among models released by Jun 2025

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Jun 2025, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 188.3
  2. 2 Gemini 2.5 Flash Jun 2025 177.6
  3. 3 Gemini 1.5 Pro Feb 2024 134.2
  4. 4 Gemini 1.5 Pro May 2024 106.5
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 188.3 Jul 2025 Model card
2 Gemini 2.5 Flash Jun 2025 177.6 Jul 2025 Model card
3 Gemini 1.5 Pro Feb 2024 134.2 Feb 2024 Model card
4 Gemini 1.5 Pro May 2024 106.5 May 2024 Model card

2 models have held number one since 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Google DeepMind
Lab claims Not tested since Jul 2025

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
100.0 120.0 140.0 160.0 180.0 200.0 2024 2025 100.0 120.0 140.0 160.0 180.0 200.0 2024 2025

No launch post has listed it since May 2024

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Google DeepMind
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
14 May 2024 Gemini 1.5 Pro 106.5 YouCook2 (val), 4-shot (CIDEr)
15 Feb 2024 Gemini 1.5 Pro 134.2 YouCook2 (val), 4-shot (CIDEr)

2 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
7 Jul 2025 Gemini 2.5 Pro technical report 188.3 YouCook2 Cap, val, 4-shot, CIDEr (Table 6) Capabilities
7 Jul 2025 Gemini 2.5 Flash technical report 177.6 YouCook2 Cap, val, 4-shot, CIDEr (Table 6) Capabilities

More in Audio and video

All 168 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%
  • TVBench In use Models answer multiple-choice questions on 10 temporal video tasks, such as action counting and ordering, that static frames cannot solve. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 81.9%