Benchmark Almanac

ViSpeak-Bench

Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 87% leads since Apr 2026 Fading

Streaming video models must notice instructions given visually, such as a hand wave, and respond in seven subtasks of visual instruction feedback.

Released with the ViSpeak-Instruct training set and the ViSpeak model. The scoring field is a guess.

In the authors’ words

Recent advances in Large Multi-modal Models (LMMs) are primarily focused on offline video understanding. Instead, streaming video understanding poses great challenges to recent models due to its time-sensitive, omni-modal and interactive characteristics. In this work, we aim to extend the streaming video understanding from a new perspective and propose a novel task named Visual Instruction Feedback in which models should be aware of visual contents and learn to extract instructions from them. For example, when users wave their hands to agents, agents should recognize the gesture and start conversations with welcome information. Thus, following instructions in visual modality greatly enhances user-agent interactions. To facilitate research, we define seven key subtasks highly relevant to visual modality and collect the ViSpeak-Instruct dataset for training and the ViSpeak-Bench for evaluation. Further, we propose the ViSpeak model, which is a SOTA streaming video understanding LMM with GPT-4o-level performance on various streaming video understanding benchmarks. After finetuning on our ViSpeak-Instruct dataset, ViSpeak is equipped with basic visual instruction feedback ability, serving as a solid baseline for future research.

Abstract of ViSpeak: Visual Instruction Feedback in Streaming Videos (arXiv:2503.12769, CC0)
Made by Fu et al. (ViSpeak team) Released Mar 2025 Video understanding Last in a launch post Apr 2026 , dropped after it saturated Last model added Apr 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
3
Models scored in lab cards
2
Launch posts list it, from 1 lab
2
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Seed2.0 Lite (0428) leads with 87% among models released by Apr 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Apr 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 87%
  2. 2 Seed1.8 79%
  3. 3 Seed2.0 Pro 78.5%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 87% Apr 2026 Model card
2 Seed1.8 79% Dec 2025 Model card
3 Seed2.0 Pro 78.5% Feb 2026 Model card

2 models have held number one since its release in Mar 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

ByteDance Seed
Lab claims Passed 85% in Apr 2026, by Seed2.0 Lite (0428)

The best score passed 85% in Apr 2026

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed2.0 Lite (0428) Seed1.8 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed2.0 Lite (0428) Seed1.8

Labs headline it less often now, last in Apr 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

ByteDance Seed
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
28 Apr 2026 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 87 ViSpeak
18 Dec 2025 Seed1.8 79 ViSpeak

2 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
21 Mar 2026 Seed1.8 model card 79 ViSpeak (Table 3) Capabilities
14 Feb 2026 Seed2.0 Pro model card 78.5 ViSpeak (Table 9) Capabilities

More in Audio and video

All 168 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%
  • TVBench In use Models answer multiple-choice questions on 10 temporal video tasks, such as action counting and ordering, that static frames cannot solve. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 81.9%