Benchmark Almanac

VideoDR (with search)

Gemini 3 Pro 76% leads since Jan 2026 In use

Agents watch a video, gather clues across frames, and search the web to answer multi-hop questions. Scored by answer accuracy.

The first release and the official leaderboard use 100 questions. A 500-question set followed on 2026-05-19 at huggingface.co/datasets/strike20023/VideoDR. Scores on the two sets are not comparable.

In the authors’ words

In real-world video question answering scenarios, videos often provide only localized visual cues, while verifiable answers are distributed across the open web; models therefore need to jointly perform cross-frame clue extraction, iterative retrieval, and multi-hop reasoning-based verification. To bridge this gap, we construct the first video deep research benchmark, VideoDR. VideoDR centers on video-conditioned open-domain video question answering, requiring cross-frame visual anchor extraction, interactive web retrieval, and multi-hop reasoning over joint video-web evidence; through rigorous human annotation and quality control, we obtain high-quality video deep research samples spanning six semantic domains. We evaluate multiple closed-source and open-source multimodal large language models under both the Workflow and Agentic paradigms, and the results show that Agentic is not consistently superior to Workflow: its gains depend on a model's ability to maintain the initial video anchors over long retrieval chains. Further analysis indicates that goal drift and long-horizon consistency are the core bottlenecks. In sum, VideoDR provides a systematic benchmark for studying video agents in open-web settings and reveals the key challenges for next-generation video deep research agents.

Abstract of Watching, Reasoning, and Searching: A Video Deep Research Benchmark on Open Web for Agentic Video Reasoning (arXiv:2601.06943, CC0)
Made by QuantaAlpha Released Jan 2026 Video understanding All tasks public Last in a launch post Aug 2026 Last model added Aug 2026 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
University Undergraduates and entry-level professionals
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
6
Models scored on its own leaderboard
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab

Gemini 3 Pro leads with 76% among models released by Dec 2025

Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.

The newest model with a score here came out in Dec 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Gemini 3 Pro 76%
  2. 2 GPT-5.2 69%
  3. 3 GPT-4o Aug 2024 43%
  4. 4 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 37%
  5. 5 InternVL3.5-14B 30%
  6. 6 MiniCPM-V 4.5 25%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini 3 Pro 76% Agentic Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
2 GPT-5.2 69% Workflow Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
3 GPT-4o Aug 2024 43% Agentic Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
4 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 37% Workflow Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
5 InternVL3.5-14B 30% Agentic Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
6 MiniCPM-V 4.5 25% Workflow Aug 2025 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Google DeepMind
Own leaderboard Not tested since Jan 2026

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Gemini 3 Pro GPT-4o 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Gemini 3 Pro GPT-4o

One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Qwen
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
3 Aug 2026 Qwen 3.8 Max 73.2 VideoDR (w/ Search)

More in Audio and video

All 168 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%
  • TVBench In use Models answer multiple-choice questions on 10 temporal video tasks, such as action counting and ordering, that static frames cannot solve. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 81.9%