Benchmark Almanac

TAT-QA

TAT-LLM (70B) 88.4% tops its leaderboard
Not in model cards

Models answer 16,552 questions about 2,757 passages from real financial reports that mix a table with text. Many answers need arithmetic, counting or comparison. Scored by exact match and F1.

ACL 2021. The test set answers were released in January 2024, so the hidden test is gone. A document version, TAT-DQA, followed in 2023. About 142 GitHub stars.

Released
May 2021
Kind
Finance
Level
University
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
All public

In the authors’ words

Hybrid data combining both tabular and textual content (e.g., financial reports) are quite pervasive in the real world. However, Question Answering (QA) over such hybrid data is largely neglected in existing research. In this work, we extract samples from real financial reports to build a new large-scale QA dataset containing both Tabular And Textual data, named TAT-QA, where numerical reasoning is usually required to infer the answer, such as addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, counting, comparison/sorting, and the compositions. We further propose a novel QA model termed TAGOP, which is capable of reasoning over both tables and text. It adopts sequence tagging to extract relevant cells from the table along with relevant spans from the text to infer their semantics, and then applies symbolic reasoning over them with a set of aggregation operators to arrive at the final answer. TAGOPachieves 58.0% inF1, which is an 11.1% absolute increase over the previous best baseline model, according to our experiments on TAT-QA. But this result still lags far behind performance of expert human, i.e.90.8% in F1. It is demonstrated that our TAT-QA is very challenging and can serve as a benchmark for training and testing powerful QA models that address hybrid form data.

Abstract of TAT-QA: A Question Answering Benchmark on a Hybrid of Tabular and Textual Content in Finance (arXiv:2105.07624, CC0)
27
Entries on its own leaderboard, 0 models we track

TAT-LLM (70B) tops the leaderboard with 88.4%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

  1. 1 TAT-LLM (70B) 88.4%
  2. 2 TAT-LLM (13B) 85.9%
  3. 3 TAT-LLM (7B) 85.1%
  4. 4 MATATA-8B 84.9%
  5. 5 Code Generation for Table-Text Question using LLM (70B) 84.7%
  6. 6 AeNER: Attention-enhanced Numerical Embeddings for Reasoning 83.2%
  7. 7 MATATA-3.8B 82.4%
  8. 8 Code Generation for Table-Text Question using LLM (13B) 81.8%
  9. 9 Encore 80.1%
  10. 10 KFEX-N: A Table-Text QA Model with Knowledge-Fused Encoder & EX-N Tree Decoder 79.5%
  11. 11 MVGE: Multi-View Graph Encoder for Answering Hybrid Numerical Reasoning Question 79.1%
  12. 12 RegHNT: Relational graph neural network with special multitask decoder 77.9%
  13. 13 Code Generation for Table-Text Question using LLM (7B) 77.3%
  14. 14 UniRPG: Unified Discrete Reasoning over Table and Text as Program Generation 76%
  15. 15 SoarGraph: Semantic-Oriented Hierarchical Graphs 75.3%
  16. 16 RSTQA: Rounds Specified numerical reasoning for Table-Text QA 75%
  17. 17 MHST: Multi-Head with Sequence to Expression Tree 72.7%
  18. 18 UniPCQA 72.2%
  19. 19 GANO: GNN for Tabular and Textual QA with Numerical Reasoning 72.1%
  20. 20 TBC 68.7%
  21. 21 FinMath: Injecting a Tree-structured Solver for Question Answering over Financial Reports 68.2%
  22. 22 KIQA: Knowledge-infused QA Model for Table and Text 67.4%
  23. 23 GenQA:Generative model for QA from table and text 65.6%
  24. 24 LETTER: Logic Enhanced Table-Text Reasoning 64.3%
  25. 25 OPERA-H 63.8%
  26. 26 TeaBReaC-pretrained T5-3B 63.8%
  27. 27 Baseline - TagOp 58%

Source: Official TAT-QA leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 TAT-LLM (70B) 88.4% Official leaderboard
2 TAT-LLM (13B) 85.9% Official leaderboard
3 TAT-LLM (7B) 85.1% Official leaderboard
4 MATATA-8B 84.9% Official leaderboard
5 Code Generation for Table-Text Question using LLM (70B) 84.7% Official leaderboard
6 AeNER: Attention-enhanced Numerical Embeddings for Reasoning 83.2% Official leaderboard
7 MATATA-3.8B 82.4% Official leaderboard
8 Code Generation for Table-Text Question using LLM (13B) 81.8% Official leaderboard
9 Encore 80.1% Official leaderboard
10 KFEX-N: A Table-Text QA Model with Knowledge-Fused Encoder & EX-N Tree Decoder 79.5% Official leaderboard
11 MVGE: Multi-View Graph Encoder for Answering Hybrid Numerical Reasoning Question 79.1% Official leaderboard
12 RegHNT: Relational graph neural network with special multitask decoder 77.9% Official leaderboard
13 Code Generation for Table-Text Question using LLM (7B) 77.3% Official leaderboard
14 UniRPG: Unified Discrete Reasoning over Table and Text as Program Generation 76% Official leaderboard
15 SoarGraph: Semantic-Oriented Hierarchical Graphs 75.3% Official leaderboard
16 RSTQA: Rounds Specified numerical reasoning for Table-Text QA 75% Official leaderboard
17 MHST: Multi-Head with Sequence to Expression Tree 72.7% Official leaderboard
18 UniPCQA 72.2% Official leaderboard
19 GANO: GNN for Tabular and Textual QA with Numerical Reasoning 72.1% Official leaderboard
20 TBC 68.7% Official leaderboard
21 FinMath: Injecting a Tree-structured Solver for Question Answering over Financial Reports 68.2% Official leaderboard
22 KIQA: Knowledge-infused QA Model for Table and Text 67.4% Official leaderboard
23 GenQA:Generative model for QA from table and text 65.6% Official leaderboard
24 LETTER: Logic Enhanced Table-Text Reasoning 64.3% Official leaderboard
25 OPERA-H 63.8% Official leaderboard
26 TeaBReaC-pretrained T5-3B 63.8% Official leaderboard
27 Baseline - TagOp 58% Official leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Law, finance and medicine

All 179 in Law, finance and medicine
  • MedXpertQA-MM In use Models answer expert-level medical exam questions that combine images with clinical records and test results. Scoring is accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 80.4%
  • HealthBench Professional In use 525 physician-authored tasks from real clinician chats (care consult, documentation, research) with physician-adjudicated rubrics. Claude Sonnet 5.5 69.2%
  • HealthBench In use 5,000 realistic health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics. A length-adjusted variant penalizes verbosity. GPT-5 67.2%
  • FinSearchComp In use Agents search the web to fetch live financial data, look up history, and run multi-step investigations, across 635 expert-written questions. Scored by answer accuracy. Ling-3.1-flash 81.7%
  • KBL In use Models answer Korean legal knowledge and reasoning tasks and Korean bar exam questions. It has 7 knowledge tasks, 4 reasoning tasks and 2,510 bar exam items. Solar Pro 4 77.5%
  • KorMedMCQA In use Models answer 7,469 multiple-choice questions from Korean licensing exams for doctors, nurses, pharmacists and dentists, held from 2012 to 2024. Solar Pro 4 93.2%