TAT-QA
Models answer 16,552 questions about 2,757 passages from real financial reports that mix a table with text. Many answers need arithmetic, counting or comparison. Scored by exact match and F1.
ACL 2021. The test set answers were released in January 2024, so the hidden test is gone. A document version, TAT-DQA, followed in 2023. About 142 GitHub stars.
- Released
- May 2021
- Kind
- Finance
- Level
- University
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Short answer
- Tasks
- All public
In the authors’ words
Hybrid data combining both tabular and textual content (e.g., financial reports) are quite pervasive in the real world. However, Question Answering (QA) over such hybrid data is largely neglected in existing research. In this work, we extract samples from real financial reports to build a new large-scale QA dataset containing both Tabular And Textual data, named TAT-QA, where numerical reasoning is usually required to infer the answer, such as addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, counting, comparison/sorting, and the compositions. We further propose a novel QA model termed TAGOP, which is capable of reasoning over both tables and text. It adopts sequence tagging to extract relevant cells from the table along with relevant spans from the text to infer their semantics, and then applies symbolic reasoning over them with a set of aggregation operators to arrive at the final answer. TAGOPachieves 58.0% inF1, which is an 11.1% absolute increase over the previous best baseline model, according to our experiments on TAT-QA. But this result still lags far behind performance of expert human, i.e.90.8% in F1. It is demonstrated that our TAT-QA is very challenging and can serve as a benchmark for training and testing powerful QA models that address hybrid form data.
TAT-LLM (70B) tops the leaderboard with 88.4%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
- 88.4 TAT-LLM (70B)
- 85.9 TAT-LLM (13B)
- 85.1 TAT-LLM (7B)
- 84.9 MATATA-8B
- 84.7 Code Generation for Table-Text Question using LLM (70B)
- 83.2 AeNER: Attention-enhanced Numerical Embeddings for Reasoning
- 82.4 MATATA-3.8B
- 81.8 Code Generation for Table-Text Question using LLM (13B)
- 80.1 Encore
- 79.5 KFEX-N: A Table-Text QA Model with Knowledge-Fused Encoder & EX-N Tree Decoder
- 79.1 MVGE: Multi-View Graph Encoder for Answering Hybrid Numerical Reasoning Question
- 77.9 RegHNT: Relational graph neural network with special multitask decoder
- 77.3 Code Generation for Table-Text Question using LLM (7B)
- 76.0 UniRPG: Unified Discrete Reasoning over Table and Text as Program Generation
- 75.3 SoarGraph: Semantic-Oriented Hierarchical Graphs
- 75.0 RSTQA: Rounds Specified numerical reasoning for Table-Text QA
- 72.7 MHST: Multi-Head with Sequence to Expression Tree
- 72.2 UniPCQA
- 72.1 GANO: GNN for Tabular and Textual QA with Numerical Reasoning
- 68.7 TBC
- 68.2 FinMath: Injecting a Tree-structured Solver for Question Answering over Financial Reports
- 67.4 KIQA: Knowledge-infused QA Model for Table and Text
- 65.6 GenQA:Generative model for QA from table and text
- 64.3 LETTER: Logic Enhanced Table-Text Reasoning
- 63.8 OPERA-H
- 63.8 TeaBReaC-pretrained T5-3B
- 58.0 Baseline - TagOp
- 1 TAT-LLM (70B) 88.4%
- 2 TAT-LLM (13B) 85.9%
- 3 TAT-LLM (7B) 85.1%
- 4 MATATA-8B 84.9%
- 5 Code Generation for Table-Text Question using LLM (70B) 84.7%
- 6 AeNER: Attention-enhanced Numerical Embeddings for Reasoning 83.2%
- 7 MATATA-3.8B 82.4%
- 8 Code Generation for Table-Text Question using LLM (13B) 81.8%
- 9 Encore 80.1%
- 10 KFEX-N: A Table-Text QA Model with Knowledge-Fused Encoder & EX-N Tree Decoder 79.5%
- 11 MVGE: Multi-View Graph Encoder for Answering Hybrid Numerical Reasoning Question 79.1%
- 12 RegHNT: Relational graph neural network with special multitask decoder 77.9%
- 13 Code Generation for Table-Text Question using LLM (7B) 77.3%
- 14 UniRPG: Unified Discrete Reasoning over Table and Text as Program Generation 76%
- 15 SoarGraph: Semantic-Oriented Hierarchical Graphs 75.3%
- 16 RSTQA: Rounds Specified numerical reasoning for Table-Text QA 75%
- 17 MHST: Multi-Head with Sequence to Expression Tree 72.7%
- 18 UniPCQA 72.2%
- 19 GANO: GNN for Tabular and Textual QA with Numerical Reasoning 72.1%
- 20 TBC 68.7%
- 21 FinMath: Injecting a Tree-structured Solver for Question Answering over Financial Reports 68.2%
- 22 KIQA: Knowledge-infused QA Model for Table and Text 67.4%
- 23 GenQA:Generative model for QA from table and text 65.6%
- 24 LETTER: Logic Enhanced Table-Text Reasoning 64.3%
- 25 OPERA-H 63.8%
- 26 TeaBReaC-pretrained T5-3B 63.8%
- 27 Baseline - TagOp 58%
Source: Official TAT-QA leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TAT-LLM (70B) | 88.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 2 | TAT-LLM (13B) | 85.9% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 3 | TAT-LLM (7B) | 85.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 4 | MATATA-8B | 84.9% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 5 | Code Generation for Table-Text Question using LLM (70B) | 84.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 6 | AeNER: Attention-enhanced Numerical Embeddings for Reasoning | 83.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 7 | MATATA-3.8B | 82.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 8 | Code Generation for Table-Text Question using LLM (13B) | 81.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 9 | Encore | 80.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 10 | KFEX-N: A Table-Text QA Model with Knowledge-Fused Encoder & EX-N Tree Decoder | 79.5% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 11 | MVGE: Multi-View Graph Encoder for Answering Hybrid Numerical Reasoning Question | 79.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 12 | RegHNT: Relational graph neural network with special multitask decoder | 77.9% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 13 | Code Generation for Table-Text Question using LLM (7B) | 77.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 14 | UniRPG: Unified Discrete Reasoning over Table and Text as Program Generation | 76% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 15 | SoarGraph: Semantic-Oriented Hierarchical Graphs | 75.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 16 | RSTQA: Rounds Specified numerical reasoning for Table-Text QA | 75% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 17 | MHST: Multi-Head with Sequence to Expression Tree | 72.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 18 | UniPCQA | 72.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 19 | GANO: GNN for Tabular and Textual QA with Numerical Reasoning | 72.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 20 | TBC | 68.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 21 | FinMath: Injecting a Tree-structured Solver for Question Answering over Financial Reports | 68.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 22 | KIQA: Knowledge-infused QA Model for Table and Text | 67.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 23 | GenQA:Generative model for QA from table and text | 65.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 24 | LETTER: Logic Enhanced Table-Text Reasoning | 64.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 25 | OPERA-H | 63.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 26 | TeaBReaC-pretrained T5-3B | 63.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 27 | Baseline - TagOp | 58% | Official leaderboard |
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Law, finance and medicine
- MedXpertQA-MM In use Models answer expert-level medical exam questions that combine images with clinical records and test results. Scoring is accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 80.4%
- HealthBench Professional In use 525 physician-authored tasks from real clinician chats (care consult, documentation, research) with physician-adjudicated rubrics. Claude Sonnet 5.5 69.2%
- HealthBench In use 5,000 realistic health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics. A length-adjusted variant penalizes verbosity. GPT-5 67.2%
- FinSearchComp In use Agents search the web to fetch live financial data, look up history, and run multi-step investigations, across 635 expert-written questions. Scored by answer accuracy.
Ling-3.1-flash 81.7%
- KBL In use Models answer Korean legal knowledge and reasoning tasks and Korean bar exam questions. It has 7 knowledge tasks, 4 reasoning tasks and 2,510 bar exam items.
Solar Pro 4 77.5%
- KorMedMCQA In use Models answer 7,469 multiple-choice questions from Korean licensing exams for doctors, nurses, pharmacists and dentists, held from 2012 to 2024.
Solar Pro 4 93.2%