HealthBench
5,000 realistic health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics. A length-adjusted variant penalizes verbosity.
In the authors’ words
We present HealthBench, an open-source benchmark measuring the performance and safety of large language models in healthcare. HealthBench consists of 5,000 multi-turn conversations between a model and an individual user or healthcare professional. Responses are evaluated using conversation-specific rubrics created by 262 physicians. Unlike previous multiple-choice or short-answer benchmarks, HealthBench enables realistic, open-ended evaluation through 48,562 unique rubric criteria spanning several health contexts (e.g., emergencies, transforming clinical data, global health) and behavioral dimensions (e.g., accuracy, instruction following, communication). HealthBench performance over the last two years reflects steady initial progress (compare GPT-3.5 Turbo's 16% to GPT-4o's 32%) and more rapid recent improvements (o3 scores 60%). Smaller models have especially improved: GPT-4.1 nano outperforms GPT-4o and is 25 times cheaper. We additionally release two HealthBench variations: HealthBench Consensus, which includes 34 particularly important dimensions of model behavior validated via physician consensus, and HealthBench Hard, where the current top score is 32%. We hope that HealthBench grounds progress towards model development and applications that benefit human health.
- Level
- Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
- Scored
- Graded by a model A language model scores each response, usually against a rubric.
- Answers
- Open-ended Free-form text, documents, designs or media judged as a whole.
GPT-5 leads with 67.2%
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
- 67.2 GPT-5
- 65.4 Claude Sonnet 5.5
- 65.1
Baichuan-M3-235B
- 64.1 GPT-5 mini
- 63.3 GPT-5.2
- 62.7 Claude Fable 5
- 62.6 GPT-5.4
- 61.6 Claude Haiku 5.5
- 60.6 Claude Opus 5.5
- 60.2
Qwen 3.8 Max
- 60.1
Baichuan-M2-32B
- 60.0 Claude Fable 5.1
- 58.7 Claude Sonnet 5
- 58.5 GPT-6.1 Sol
- 58.3 GPT-6 Astra
- 58.0 Kimi K2 Thinking
- 57.9
Ring-1T
- 57.8 Claude Opus 5
- 57.7
Seed2.0 Pro
- 57.6 gpt-oss-120b
- 57.0 GPT-5.6 Sol
- 57.0 GPT-5.6 Terra
- 56.5 GPT-5.5
- 55.8 GPT-5.6 Luna
- 55.1 GPT-6.1 Terra
- 54.5 GPT-6 Luna
- 53.2 GPT-6 Sol
- 51.4 GPT-5.5 Instant
- 44.7
STEP3-VL-10B
- 42.5 gpt-oss-20b
- 1 GPT-5 67.2%
- 2 Claude Sonnet 5.5 65.4%
- 3
Baichuan-M3-235B 65.1%
- 4 GPT-5 mini 64.1%
- 5 GPT-5.2 63.3%
- 6 Claude Fable 5 62.7%
- 7 GPT-5.4 62.6%
- 8 Claude Haiku 5.5 61.6%
- 9 Claude Opus 5.5 60.6%
- 10
Qwen 3.8 Max 60.2%
- 11
Baichuan-M2-32B 60.1%
- 12 Claude Fable 5.1 60%
- 13 Claude Sonnet 5 58.7%
- 14 GPT-6.1 Sol 58.5%
- 15 GPT-6 Astra 58.3%
- 16 Kimi K2 Thinking 58%
- 17
Ring-1T 57.9%
- 18 Claude Opus 5 57.8%
- 19
Seed2.0 Pro 57.7%
- 20 gpt-oss-120b 57.6%
- 21 GPT-5.6 Sol 57%
- 22 GPT-5.6 Terra 57%
- 23 GPT-5.5 56.5%
- 24 GPT-5.6 Luna 55.8%
- 25 GPT-6.1 Terra 55.1%
- 26 GPT-6 Luna 54.5%
- 27 GPT-6 Sol 53.2%
- 28 GPT-5.5 Instant 51.4%
- 29
STEP3-VL-10B 44.7%
- 30 gpt-oss-20b 42.5%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-5 | 67.2% | Aug 2025 | Model card | |
| 2 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 65.4% | Sep 2026 | Model card | |
| 3 | | 65.1% | Jan 2026 | Model card | |
| 4 | GPT-5 mini | 64.1% | Aug 2025 | Model card | |
| 5 | GPT-5.2 | 63.3% | Dec 2025 | Model card | |
| 6 | Claude Fable 5 | 62.7% | Jun 2026 | Model card | |
| 7 | GPT-5.4 | 62.6% | Mar 2026 | Model card | |
| 8 | Claude Haiku 5.5 | 61.6% | Oct 2026 | Model card | |
| 9 | Claude Opus 5.5 | 60.6% | Sep 2026 | Model card | |
| 10 | | 60.2% | Aug 2026 | Model card | |
| 11 | | 60.1% | Aug 2025 | Model card | |
| 12 | Claude Fable 5.1 | 60% | Sep 2026 | Model card | |
| 13 | Claude Sonnet 5 | 58.7% | Jun 2026 | Model card | |
| 14 | GPT-6.1 Sol | 58.5% | Sep 2026 | Model card | |
| 15 | GPT-6 Astra | 58.3% | Sep 2026 | Model card | |
| 16 | Kimi K2 Thinking | 58% | Nov 2025 | Model card | |
| 17 | | 57.9% | Oct 2025 | Model card | |
| 18 | Claude Opus 5 | 57.8% | Jul 2026 | Model card | |
| 19 | | 57.7% | Feb 2026 | Model card | |
| 20 | gpt-oss-120b | 57.6% | Aug 2025 | Model card | |
| 21 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 57% | Jun 2026 | Model card | |
| 22 | GPT-5.6 Terra | 57% | Jun 2026 | Model card | |
| 23 | GPT-5.5 | 56.5% | Apr 2026 | Model card | |
| 24 | GPT-5.6 Luna | 55.8% | Jun 2026 | Model card | |
| 25 | GPT-6.1 Terra | 55.1% | Oct 2026 | Model card | |
| 26 | GPT-6 Luna | 54.5% | Sep 2026 | Model card | |
| 27 | GPT-6 Sol | 53.2% | Sep 2026 | Model card | |
| 28 | GPT-5.5 Instant | 51.4% | May 2026 | Model card | |
| 29 | | 44.7% | Jan 2026 | Model card | |
| 30 | gpt-oss-20b | 42.5% | Aug 2025 | Model card |
2 models have held number one since its release in May 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
2 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 Aug 2026 | 60.2 | HealthBench | |
| 9 Jun 2026 | Claude Fable 5 | 62.7 | HealthBench |
| 14 Feb 2026 | 57.7 | HealthBench | |
| 13 Jan 2026 | 65.1 | HealthBench Total | |
| 6 Nov 2025 | Kimi K2 Thinking | 58 | HealthBench, no tools |
| 10 Oct 2025 | 57.9 | HealthBench (score) | |
| 10 Aug 2025 | 60.1 | HealthBench | |
| 7 Aug 2025 | GPT-5 | 67.2 | HealthBench Realistic health conversations |
| 5 Aug 2025 | gpt-oss-20b | 42.5 | HealthBench |
| 5 Aug 2025 | gpt-oss-120b | 57.6 | HealthBench Realistic health conversations |
35 system cards report it, from 6 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 Oct 2026 | GPT-6 Luna system card addendum | 48.2 | HealthBench, length-adjusted (Table 5) | Health |
| 26 Oct 2026 | GPT-6.1 Terra system card addendum | 55.1 | HealthBench, length-adjusted (unadjusted 51.1) (HealthBench table, 5.1) | Health |
| 7 Oct 2026 | GPT-6 Sol system card addendum | 52.1 | HealthBench, length-adjusted (Table 5) | Health |
| 7 Oct 2026 | GPT-6 Luna system card addendum | 50.4 | HealthBench, length-adjusted (Table 5) | Health |
| 7 Oct 2026 | Claude Haiku 5.5 system card | 61.6 | HealthBench, length-adjusted, max effort (8.11.3) | Health |
| 29 Sep 2026 | GPT-6.1 Sol system card addendum | 58.5 | HealthBench, length-adjusted (Table 7) | Health |
| 28 Sep 2026 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 system card | 65.4 | HealthBench, length-adjusted at max effort (69.4% before length adjustment) (8.15.1, Figure 8.15.B) | Health |
| 22 Sep 2026 | GPT-6 Sol system card | 53.2 | HealthBench, length-adjusted (Table 29, A.4.1) | Health |
| 22 Sep 2026 | GPT-6 Luna system card | 54.5 | HealthBench, length-adjusted (Table 29, A.4.1) | Health |
| 22 Sep 2026 | Claude Opus 5.5 system card | 60.6 | HealthBench, length-adjusted at max effort, safety classifiers with Opus 5 fallback (68.1% before length adjustment) (8.15.1, Figure 8.15.1.A) | Health |
| 3 Sep 2026 | GPT-6 Astra system card | 58.3 | HealthBench, length-adjusted (Table 6) | Health |
| 1 Sep 2026 | Claude Fable 5.1 system card | 60 | HealthBench length-adjusted score, max effort, safety classifiers with Opus 5 fallback; raw score 66.7% (8.17.1) | Health |
| 6 Aug 2026 | GPT-5.6 Sol system card addendum | 55 | HealthBench, length-adjusted (5.1 table) | Health |
| 6 Aug 2026 | GPT-5.6 Luna system card addendum | 53.3 | HealthBench, length-adjusted (5.1 table) | Health |
| 24 Jul 2026 | Claude Opus 5 system card | 57.8 | HealthBench, length-adjusted at max effort (67.1% raw), Claude Opus 4.8 grader, five trials (8.15.1) | Health |
| 9 Jul 2026 | GPT-5.6 Terra system card | 57 | HealthBench, length-adjusted (5.1 table) | Health |
| 9 Jul 2026 | GPT-5.6 Sol system card | 57 | HealthBench, length-adjusted (5.1 table) | Health |
| 9 Jul 2026 | GPT-5.6 Luna system card | 55.8 | HealthBench, length-adjusted (5.1 table) | Health |
| 30 Jun 2026 | Claude Sonnet 5 system card | 58.7 | HealthBench, length-adjusted, max effort, five trials, Opus 4.8 grader (8.12.1, Figure 8.12.1.A) | Health |
| 25 Jun 2026 | GPT-5.6 Terra system card | 57 | HealthBench, length-adjusted (5.1 table) | Health |
| 25 Jun 2026 | GPT-5.6 Sol system card | 57 | HealthBench, length-adjusted (5.1 table) | Health |
| 25 Jun 2026 | GPT-5.6 Luna system card | 55.8 | HealthBench, length-adjusted (5.1 table) | Health |
| 4 May 2026 | GPT-5.5 Instant system card | 51.4 | HealthBench, length-adjusted, unadjusted 50.9 (Table 5) | Health |
| 23 Apr 2026 | GPT-5.5 system card | 56.5 | HealthBench, length-adjusted (Table 7) | Health |
| 5 Mar 2026 | GPT-5.4 system card | 62.6 | HealthBench, unadjusted (Table 6) | Health |
| 14 Feb 2026 | | 57.7 | HealthBench (Table 3) | Health |
| 6 Feb 2026 | | 65.1 | HealthBench Total (4.2.1 text and Table 2) | Health |
| 14 Jan 2026 | | 44.7 | HealthBench, SeRe (Table 2) | Health |
| 11 Dec 2025 | GPT-5.2 system card addendum | 63.3 | HealthBench, gpt-5.2-thinking, 0.633379 (Table 5) | Health |
| 21 Oct 2025 | | 57.9 | HealthBench (Table 1) | Health |
| 2 Sep 2025 | | 60.1 | HealthBench Overall (Figures 6 and 7). Emergency Referrals 74.6, Context Awareness 48.0, Context Seeking 55.8, Communication 68.6, Global Health 57.1, Completeness 67.2 (4.1) | Health |
| 7 Aug 2025 | GPT-5 system card | 67.2 | HealthBench, printed chart label (Figure 6) | Health |
| 7 Aug 2025 | GPT-5 mini system card | 64.1 | HealthBench, gpt-5-thinking-mini, printed chart label (Figure 6) | Health |
| 5 Aug 2025 | gpt-oss-20b model card | 42.5 | HealthBench, high reasoning (Table 3) | Health |
| 5 Aug 2025 | gpt-oss-120b model card | 57.6 | HealthBench, high reasoning (Table 3) | Health |
More in Law, finance and medicine
- HealthBench Professional In use 525 physician-authored tasks from real clinician chats (care consult, documentation, research) with physician-adjudicated rubrics. Claude Sonnet 5.5 69.2%
- MedXpertQA-MM In use Models answer expert-level medical exam questions that combine images with clinical records and test results. Scoring is accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 80.4%
- KBL In use Models answer Korean legal knowledge and reasoning tasks and Korean bar exam questions. It has 7 knowledge tasks, 4 reasoning tasks and 2,510 bar exam items.
Solar Pro 4 77.5%
- KorMedMCQA In use Models answer 7,469 multiple-choice questions from Korean licensing exams for doctors, nurses, pharmacists and dentists, held from 2012 to 2024.
Solar Pro 4 93.2%
- PRBench In use Model answers 1,100 expert-written law and finance questions. LLM judge grades against weighted expert rubrics of 10-30 criteria each.
Muse Spark 1.3 61.6%
- FrontierFinance In use Agents answer 220 investment research queries from finance experts across six use cases of the investor workflow. Three judge models check each answer against 11,543 source-attributed rubrics. Claude Fable 5.1 55.9%