Benchmark Almanac

HealthBench

GPT-5 67.2% leads since Aug 2025 In use

5,000 realistic health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics. A length-adjusted variant penalizes verbosity.

In the authors’ words

We present HealthBench, an open-source benchmark measuring the performance and safety of large language models in healthcare. HealthBench consists of 5,000 multi-turn conversations between a model and an individual user or healthcare professional. Responses are evaluated using conversation-specific rubrics created by 262 physicians. Unlike previous multiple-choice or short-answer benchmarks, HealthBench enables realistic, open-ended evaluation through 48,562 unique rubric criteria spanning several health contexts (e.g., emergencies, transforming clinical data, global health) and behavioral dimensions (e.g., accuracy, instruction following, communication). HealthBench performance over the last two years reflects steady initial progress (compare GPT-3.5 Turbo's 16% to GPT-4o's 32%) and more rapid recent improvements (o3 scores 60%). Smaller models have especially improved: GPT-4.1 nano outperforms GPT-4o and is 25 times cheaper. We additionally release two HealthBench variations: HealthBench Consensus, which includes 34 particularly important dimensions of model behavior validated via physician consensus, and HealthBench Hard, where the current top score is 32%. We hope that HealthBench grounds progress towards model development and applications that benefit human health.

Abstract of HealthBench: Evaluating Large Language Models Towards Improved Human Health (arXiv:2505.08775, CC0)
Made by OpenAI Released May 2025 Medicine All tasks public Last in a launch post Aug 2026 Last model added Oct 2026
Level
Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
Scored
Graded by a model A language model scores each response, usually against a rubric.
Answers
Open-ended Free-form text, documents, designs or media judged as a whole.
30
Models scored in lab cards
10
Launch posts list it, from 7 labs
35
System cards report it, from 6 labs

GPT-5 leads with 67.2%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 GPT-5 67.2%
  2. 2 Claude Sonnet 5.5 65.4%
  3. 3 Baichuan-M3-235B 65.1%
  4. 4 GPT-5 mini 64.1%
  5. 5 GPT-5.2 63.3%
  6. 6 Claude Fable 5 62.7%
  7. 7 GPT-5.4 62.6%
  8. 8 Claude Haiku 5.5 61.6%
  9. 9 Claude Opus 5.5 60.6%
  10. 10 Qwen 3.8 Max 60.2%
  11. 11 Baichuan-M2-32B 60.1%
  12. 12 Claude Fable 5.1 60%
  13. 13 Claude Sonnet 5 58.7%
  14. 14 GPT-6.1 Sol 58.5%
  15. 15 GPT-6 Astra 58.3%
  16. 16 Kimi K2 Thinking 58%
  17. 17 Ring-1T 57.9%
  18. 18 Claude Opus 5 57.8%
  19. 19 Seed2.0 Pro 57.7%
  20. 20 gpt-oss-120b 57.6%
  21. 21 GPT-5.6 Sol 57%
  22. 22 GPT-5.6 Terra 57%
  23. 23 GPT-5.5 56.5%
  24. 24 GPT-5.6 Luna 55.8%
  25. 25 GPT-6.1 Terra 55.1%
  26. 26 GPT-6 Luna 54.5%
  27. 27 GPT-6 Sol 53.2%
  28. 28 GPT-5.5 Instant 51.4%
  29. 29 STEP3-VL-10B 44.7%
  30. 30 gpt-oss-20b 42.5%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-5 67.2% Aug 2025 Model card
2 Claude Sonnet 5.5 65.4% Sep 2026 Model card
3 Baichuan-M3-235B 65.1% Jan 2026 Model card
4 GPT-5 mini 64.1% Aug 2025 Model card
5 GPT-5.2 63.3% Dec 2025 Model card
6 Claude Fable 5 62.7% Jun 2026 Model card
7 GPT-5.4 62.6% Mar 2026 Model card
8 Claude Haiku 5.5 61.6% Oct 2026 Model card
9 Claude Opus 5.5 60.6% Sep 2026 Model card
10 Qwen 3.8 Max 60.2% Aug 2026 Model card
11 Baichuan-M2-32B 60.1% Aug 2025 Model card
12 Claude Fable 5.1 60% Sep 2026 Model card
13 Claude Sonnet 5 58.7% Jun 2026 Model card
14 GPT-6.1 Sol 58.5% Sep 2026 Model card
15 GPT-6 Astra 58.3% Sep 2026 Model card
16 Kimi K2 Thinking 58% Nov 2025 Model card
17 Ring-1T 57.9% Oct 2025 Model card
18 Claude Opus 5 57.8% Jul 2026 Model card
19 Seed2.0 Pro 57.7% Feb 2026 Model card
20 gpt-oss-120b 57.6% Aug 2025 Model card
21 GPT-5.6 Sol 57% Jun 2026 Model card
22 GPT-5.6 Terra 57% Jun 2026 Model card
23 GPT-5.5 56.5% Apr 2026 Model card
24 GPT-5.6 Luna 55.8% Jun 2026 Model card
25 GPT-6.1 Terra 55.1% Oct 2026 Model card
26 GPT-6 Luna 54.5% Sep 2026 Model card
27 GPT-6 Sol 53.2% Sep 2026 Model card
28 GPT-5.5 Instant 51.4% May 2026 Model card
29 STEP3-VL-10B 44.7% Jan 2026 Model card
30 gpt-oss-20b 42.5% Aug 2025 Model card

2 models have held number one since its release in May 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI
Lab claims 2 leaders
GPT-5 67.2%

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-5 gpt-oss-120b 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-5 gpt-oss-120b

2 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

OpenAI
Baichuan
Ant Group
Moonshot AI
ByteDance Seed
Anthropic
Qwen
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
3 Aug 2026 Qwen 3.8 Max 60.2 HealthBench
9 Jun 2026 Claude Fable 5 62.7 HealthBench
14 Feb 2026 Seed2.0 Pro 57.7 HealthBench
13 Jan 2026 Baichuan-M3-235B 65.1 HealthBench Total
6 Nov 2025 Kimi K2 Thinking 58 HealthBench, no tools
10 Oct 2025 Ring-1T 57.9 HealthBench (score)
10 Aug 2025 Baichuan-M2-32B 60.1 HealthBench
7 Aug 2025 GPT-5 67.2 HealthBench Realistic health conversations
5 Aug 2025 gpt-oss-20b 42.5 HealthBench
5 Aug 2025 gpt-oss-120b 57.6 HealthBench Realistic health conversations

35 system cards report it, from 6 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
29 Oct 2026 GPT-6 Luna system card addendum 48.2 HealthBench, length-adjusted (Table 5) Health
26 Oct 2026 GPT-6.1 Terra system card addendum 55.1 HealthBench, length-adjusted (unadjusted 51.1) (HealthBench table, 5.1) Health
7 Oct 2026 GPT-6 Sol system card addendum 52.1 HealthBench, length-adjusted (Table 5) Health
7 Oct 2026 GPT-6 Luna system card addendum 50.4 HealthBench, length-adjusted (Table 5) Health
7 Oct 2026 Claude Haiku 5.5 system card 61.6 HealthBench, length-adjusted, max effort (8.11.3) Health
29 Sep 2026 GPT-6.1 Sol system card addendum 58.5 HealthBench, length-adjusted (Table 7) Health
28 Sep 2026 Claude Sonnet 5.5 system card 65.4 HealthBench, length-adjusted at max effort (69.4% before length adjustment) (8.15.1, Figure 8.15.B) Health
22 Sep 2026 GPT-6 Sol system card 53.2 HealthBench, length-adjusted (Table 29, A.4.1) Health
22 Sep 2026 GPT-6 Luna system card 54.5 HealthBench, length-adjusted (Table 29, A.4.1) Health
22 Sep 2026 Claude Opus 5.5 system card 60.6 HealthBench, length-adjusted at max effort, safety classifiers with Opus 5 fallback (68.1% before length adjustment) (8.15.1, Figure 8.15.1.A) Health
3 Sep 2026 GPT-6 Astra system card 58.3 HealthBench, length-adjusted (Table 6) Health
1 Sep 2026 Claude Fable 5.1 system card 60 HealthBench length-adjusted score, max effort, safety classifiers with Opus 5 fallback; raw score 66.7% (8.17.1) Health
6 Aug 2026 GPT-5.6 Sol system card addendum 55 HealthBench, length-adjusted (5.1 table) Health
6 Aug 2026 GPT-5.6 Luna system card addendum 53.3 HealthBench, length-adjusted (5.1 table) Health
24 Jul 2026 Claude Opus 5 system card 57.8 HealthBench, length-adjusted at max effort (67.1% raw), Claude Opus 4.8 grader, five trials (8.15.1) Health
9 Jul 2026 GPT-5.6 Terra system card 57 HealthBench, length-adjusted (5.1 table) Health
9 Jul 2026 GPT-5.6 Sol system card 57 HealthBench, length-adjusted (5.1 table) Health
9 Jul 2026 GPT-5.6 Luna system card 55.8 HealthBench, length-adjusted (5.1 table) Health
30 Jun 2026 Claude Sonnet 5 system card 58.7 HealthBench, length-adjusted, max effort, five trials, Opus 4.8 grader (8.12.1, Figure 8.12.1.A) Health
25 Jun 2026 GPT-5.6 Terra system card 57 HealthBench, length-adjusted (5.1 table) Health
25 Jun 2026 GPT-5.6 Sol system card 57 HealthBench, length-adjusted (5.1 table) Health
25 Jun 2026 GPT-5.6 Luna system card 55.8 HealthBench, length-adjusted (5.1 table) Health
4 May 2026 GPT-5.5 Instant system card 51.4 HealthBench, length-adjusted, unadjusted 50.9 (Table 5) Health
23 Apr 2026 GPT-5.5 system card 56.5 HealthBench, length-adjusted (Table 7) Health
5 Mar 2026 GPT-5.4 system card 62.6 HealthBench, unadjusted (Table 6) Health
14 Feb 2026 Seed2.0 Pro model card 57.7 HealthBench (Table 3) Health
6 Feb 2026 Baichuan-M3-235B technical report 65.1 HealthBench Total (4.2.1 text and Table 2) Health
14 Jan 2026 STEP3-VL-10B technical report 44.7 HealthBench, SeRe (Table 2) Health
11 Dec 2025 GPT-5.2 system card addendum 63.3 HealthBench, gpt-5.2-thinking, 0.633379 (Table 5) Health
21 Oct 2025 Ring-1T technical report 57.9 HealthBench (Table 1) Health
2 Sep 2025 Baichuan-M2-32B technical report 60.1 HealthBench Overall (Figures 6 and 7). Emergency Referrals 74.6, Context Awareness 48.0, Context Seeking 55.8, Communication 68.6, Global Health 57.1, Completeness 67.2 (4.1) Health
7 Aug 2025 GPT-5 system card 67.2 HealthBench, printed chart label (Figure 6) Health
7 Aug 2025 GPT-5 mini system card 64.1 HealthBench, gpt-5-thinking-mini, printed chart label (Figure 6) Health
5 Aug 2025 gpt-oss-20b model card 42.5 HealthBench, high reasoning (Table 3) Health
5 Aug 2025 gpt-oss-120b model card 57.6 HealthBench, high reasoning (Table 3) Health

More in Law, finance and medicine

All 140 in Law, finance and medicine
  • HealthBench Professional In use 525 physician-authored tasks from real clinician chats (care consult, documentation, research) with physician-adjudicated rubrics. Claude Sonnet 5.5 69.2%
  • MedXpertQA-MM In use Models answer expert-level medical exam questions that combine images with clinical records and test results. Scoring is accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 80.4%
  • KBL In use Models answer Korean legal knowledge and reasoning tasks and Korean bar exam questions. It has 7 knowledge tasks, 4 reasoning tasks and 2,510 bar exam items. Solar Pro 4 77.5%
  • KorMedMCQA In use Models answer 7,469 multiple-choice questions from Korean licensing exams for doctors, nurses, pharmacists and dentists, held from 2012 to 2024. Solar Pro 4 93.2%
  • PRBench In use Model answers 1,100 expert-written law and finance questions. LLM judge grades against weighted expert rubrics of 10-30 criteria each. Muse Spark 1.3 61.6%
  • FrontierFinance In use Agents answer 220 investment research queries from finance experts across six use cases of the investor workflow. Three judge models check each answer against 11,543 source-attributed rubrics. Claude Fable 5.1 55.9%