Benchmark Almanac

KorMedMCQA

Solar Pro 4 93.2% leads since Aug 2026 In use

Models answer 7,469 multiple-choice questions from Korean licensing exams for doctors, nurses, pharmacists and dentists, held from 2012 to 2024.

A multimodal follow-up, KorMedMCQA-V, appeared in 2026-02.

In the authors’ words

We present KorMedMCQA, the first Korean Medical Multiple-Choice Question Answering benchmark, derived from professional healthcare licensing examinations conducted in Korea between 2012 and 2024. The dataset contains 7,469 questions from examinations for doctor, nurse, pharmacist, and dentist, covering a wide range of medical disciplines. We evaluate the performance of 59 large language models, spanning proprietary and open-source models, multilingual and Korean-specialized models, and those fine-tuned for clinical applications. Our results show that applying Chain of Thought (CoT) reasoning can enhance the model performance by up to 4.5% compared to direct answering approaches. We also investigate whether MedQA, one of the most widely used medical benchmarks derived from the U.S. Medical Licensing Examination, can serve as a reliable proxy for evaluating model performance in other regions-in this case, Korea. Our correlation analysis between model scores on KorMedMCQA and MedQA reveals that these two benchmarks align no better than benchmarks from entirely different domains (e.g., MedQA and MMLU-Pro). This finding underscores the substantial linguistic and clinical differences between Korean and U.S. medical contexts, reinforcing the need for region-specific medical QA benchmarks. To support ongoing research in Korean healthcare AI, we publicly release the KorMedMCQA via Huggingface.

Abstract of KorMedMCQA: Multi-Choice Question Answering Benchmark for Korean Healthcare Professional Licensing Examinations (arXiv:2403.01469, CC0)
Made by KAIST and collaborators (Sunjun Kweon et al.) Released Mar 2024 Medicine All tasks public Last in a launch post Aug 2026 Last model added Aug 2026
Level
Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Multiple choice
4
Models scored in lab cards
4
Launch posts list it, from 1 lab
2
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Solar Pro 4 leads with 93.2% among models released by Aug 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Aug 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Solar Pro 4 93.2%
  2. 2 Solar Open 2 93%
  3. 3 Solar Pro 2 87.4%
  4. 4 Solar Open 100B 84.4%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Solar Pro 4 93.2% Aug 2026 Model card
2 Solar Open 2 93% Jul 2026 Model card
3 Solar Pro 2 87.4% Jul 2025 Model card
4 Solar Open 100B 84.4% Dec 2025 Model card

3 models have held number one since its release in Mar 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Upstage
Lab claims Passed 85% in Jul 2025, by Solar Pro 2
Solar Pro 4 93.2%

The best score passed 85% in Jul 2025

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Solar Pro 4 Solar Pro 2 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Solar Pro 4 Solar Pro 2

One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Upstage
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
11 Aug 2026 Solar Pro 4 93.2 KorMedMCQA (medicine)* (in-house)
22 Jul 2026 Solar Open 2 93 KorMedMCQA
31 Dec 2025 Solar Open 100B 84.4 KorMedMCQA
10 Jul 2025 Solar Pro 2 87.4 KorMedMCQA (medical)

2 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
22 Jul 2026 Solar Open 2 technical report 93 KorMedMCQA (Table 4) Capabilities
11 Jan 2026 Solar Open 100B technical report 84.4 KorMedMCQA (Table 5) Capabilities

More in Law, finance and medicine

All 140 in Law, finance and medicine
  • HealthBench Professional In use 525 physician-authored tasks from real clinician chats (care consult, documentation, research) with physician-adjudicated rubrics. Claude Sonnet 5.5 69.2%
  • MedXpertQA-MM In use Models answer expert-level medical exam questions that combine images with clinical records and test results. Scoring is accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 80.4%
  • HealthBench In use 5,000 realistic health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics. A length-adjusted variant penalizes verbosity. GPT-5 67.2%
  • KBL In use Models answer Korean legal knowledge and reasoning tasks and Korean bar exam questions. It has 7 knowledge tasks, 4 reasoning tasks and 2,510 bar exam items. Solar Pro 4 77.5%
  • PRBench In use Model answers 1,100 expert-written law and finance questions. LLM judge grades against weighted expert rubrics of 10-30 criteria each. Muse Spark 1.3 61.6%
  • FrontierFinance In use Agents answer 220 investment research queries from finance experts across six use cases of the investor workflow. Three judge models check each answer against 11,543 source-attributed rubrics. Claude Fable 5.1 55.9%