Benchmark Almanac

FinSearchComp

Ling-3.1-flash 81.7% leads since Oct 2026 Fading

Agents search the web to fetch live financial data, look up history, and run multi-step investigations, across 635 expert-written questions. Scored by answer accuracy.

Cards report different subsets, such as T2 and T3 or the global split.

In the authors’ words

Search has emerged as core infrastructure for LLM-based agents and is widely viewed as critical on the path toward more general intelligence. Finance is a particularly demanding proving ground: analysts routinely conduct complex, multi-step searches over time-sensitive, domain-specific data, making it ideal for assessing both search proficiency and knowledge-grounded reasoning. Yet no existing open financial datasets evaluate data searching capability of end-to-end agents, largely because constructing realistic, complicated tasks requires deep financial expertise and time-sensitive data is hard to evaluate. We present FinSearchComp, the first fully open-source agent benchmark for realistic, open-domain financial search and reasoning. FinSearchComp comprises three tasks – Time-Sensitive Data Fetching, Simple Historical Lookup, and Complex Historical Investigation – closely reproduce real-world financial analyst workflows. To ensure difficulty and reliability, we engage 70 professional financial experts for annotation and implement a rigorous multi-stage quality-assurance pipeline. The benchmark includes 635 questions spanning global and Greater China markets, and we evaluate 21 models (products) on it. Grok 4 (web) tops the global subset, approaching expert-level accuracy. DouBao (web) leads on the Greater China subset. Experimental analyses show that equipping agents with web search and financial plugins substantially improves results on FinSearchComp, and the country origin of models and tools impact performance significantly.By aligning with realistic analyst tasks and providing end-to-end evaluation, FinSearchComp offers a professional, high-difficulty testbed for complex financial search and reasoning.

Abstract of FinSearchComp: Towards a Realistic, Expert-Level Evaluation of Financial Search and Reasoning (arXiv:2509.13160, CC0)
Made by ByteDance Seed Released Sep 2025 Finance All tasks public Last in a launch post Oct 2026 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Oct 2026
Level
Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
Scored
Graded by a model A language model scores each response, usually against a rubric.
Answers
Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
7
Models scored in lab cards
7
Launch posts list it, from 4 labs
3
System cards report it, from 2 labs

Ling-3.1-flash leads with 81.7%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Ling-3.1-flash 81.7%
  2. 2 Seed2.0 Pro 70.2%
  3. 3 Kimi K2.5 67.8%
  4. 4 MiniMax-M2 65.5%
  5. 5 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 63.8%
  6. 6 Seed1.8 62.8%
  7. 7 Kimi K2 Thinking 47.4%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Ling-3.1-flash 81.7% Oct 2026 Model card
2 Seed2.0 Pro 70.2% Feb 2026 Model card
3 Kimi K2.5 67.8% Jan 2026 Model card
4 MiniMax-M2 65.5% Oct 2025 Model card
5 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 63.8% Apr 2026 Model card
6 Seed1.8 62.8% Dec 2025 Model card
7 Kimi K2 Thinking 47.4% Nov 2025 Model card

4 models have held number one since its release in Sep 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

MiniMax Moonshot AI ByteDance Seed Ant Group
Lab claims 4 leaders

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Ling-3.1-flash Seed2.0 Pro MiniMax-M2 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Ling-3.1-flash Seed2.0 Pro

Labs headline it less often now, last in Oct 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

MiniMax
Moonshot AI
ByteDance Seed
Ant Group
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
13 Oct 2026 Ling-3.1-flash 81.7 Finsearch (taken as FinSearchComp)
28 Apr 2026 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 63.8 FinSearchComp
14 Feb 2026 Seed2.0 Pro 70.2 FinSearchComp
27 Jan 2026 Kimi K2.5 67.8 FinSearchCompT2&T3
18 Dec 2025 Seed1.8 62.8 FinSearchComp(T2&T3)
6 Nov 2025 Kimi K2 Thinking 47.4 FinSearchComp-T3, w/ tools
27 Oct 2025 MiniMax-M2 65.5 FinSearchComp-global

3 system cards report it, from 2 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
21 Mar 2026 Seed1.8 model card 62.8 FinSearchComp(T2&T3) (Table 4). The 2.3 text says 56.2 Capabilities
14 Feb 2026 Seed2.0 Pro model card 70.2 FinSearchComp (Table 11) Capabilities
30 Jan 2026 Kimi K2.5 technical report 67.8 FinSearchComp T2&T3 (Table 4) Capabilities

More in Law, finance and medicine

All 140 in Law, finance and medicine
  • HealthBench Professional In use 525 physician-authored tasks from real clinician chats (care consult, documentation, research) with physician-adjudicated rubrics. Claude Sonnet 5.5 69.2%
  • MedXpertQA-MM In use Models answer expert-level medical exam questions that combine images with clinical records and test results. Scoring is accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 80.4%
  • HealthBench In use 5,000 realistic health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics. A length-adjusted variant penalizes verbosity. GPT-5 67.2%
  • KBL In use Models answer Korean legal knowledge and reasoning tasks and Korean bar exam questions. It has 7 knowledge tasks, 4 reasoning tasks and 2,510 bar exam items. Solar Pro 4 77.5%
  • KorMedMCQA In use Models answer 7,469 multiple-choice questions from Korean licensing exams for doctors, nurses, pharmacists and dentists, held from 2012 to 2024. Solar Pro 4 93.2%
  • PRBench In use Model answers 1,100 expert-written law and finance questions. LLM judge grades against weighted expert rubrics of 10-30 criteria each. Muse Spark 1.3 61.6%