Benchmark Almanac

TACoS

Seed1.5-VL 49.6% Dropped

Models find the time span in a cooking video that matches a sentence. Labs score temporal grounding by mean IoU with the annotated span.

The corpus came from a GCPR 2014 paper on multi-sentence video description. Later work reused it for temporal grounding. The month is the GCPR conference month.

Made by Max Planck Institute for Informatics (Rohrbach et al.) Released Sep 2014 Video understanding All tasks public Last in a launch post May 2025 , dropped before it saturated Last model added May 2025
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
1
Model scored in lab cards
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

Seed1.5-VL leads with 49.6%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Seed1.5-VL 49.6%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Seed1.5-VL 49.6% May 2025 Model card

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed1.5-VL 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed1.5-VL

No launch post has listed it since May 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

ByteDance Seed
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
12 May 2025 Seed1.5-VL 49.6 TACoS (mIoU)

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
11 May 2025 Seed1.5-VL technical report 49.6 TACoS, mIoU, thinking (Table 7). Non-thinking 47.8 Capabilities

More in Audio and video

All 168 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%
  • TVBench In use Models answer multiple-choice questions on 10 temporal video tasks, such as action counting and ordering, that static frames cannot solve. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 81.9%