Benchmark Almanac

StreamingBench

Seed1.8 84.4% leads since Dec 2025 Fading

Models answer questions while a video streams in, as a human viewer would. It tests real-time visual understanding, omni-source understanding and context understanding.

Qwen reports it as audio-visual interaction.

In the authors’ words

The rapid development of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) has expanded their capabilities from image comprehension to video understanding. However, most of these MLLMs focus primarily on offline video comprehension, necessitating extensive processing of all video frames before any queries can be made. This presents a significant gap compared to the human ability to watch, listen, think, and respond to streaming inputs in real time, highlighting the limitations of current MLLMs. In this paper, we introduce StreamingBench, the first comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate the streaming video understanding capabilities of MLLMs. StreamingBench assesses three core aspects of streaming video understanding: (1) real-time visual understanding, (2) omni-source understanding, and (3) contextual understanding. The benchmark consists of 18 tasks, featuring 900 videos and 4,500 human-curated QA pairs. Each video features five questions presented at different time points to simulate a continuous streaming scenario. We conduct experiments on StreamingBench with 13 open-source and proprietary MLLMs and find that even the most advanced proprietary MLLMs like Gemini 1.5 Pro and GPT-4o perform significantly below human-level streaming video understanding capabilities. We hope our work can facilitate further advancements for MLLMs, empowering them to approach human-level video comprehension and interaction in more realistic scenarios.

Abstract of StreamingBench: Assessing the Gap for MLLMs to Achieve Streaming Video Understanding (arXiv:2411.03628, CC0)
Made by Lin et al. (arXiv 2411.03628) Released Nov 2024 Video understanding All tasks public Last in a launch post Sep 2026 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Sep 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Multiple choice
3
Models scored in lab cards
3
Launch posts list it, from 2 labs
3
System cards report it, from 2 labs

Seed1.8 leads with 84.4%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Seed1.8 84.4%
  2. 2 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 80.8%
  3. 3 Seed1.5-VL 68%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Seed1.8 84.4% Dec 2025 Model card
2 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 80.8% Sep 2026 Model card
3 Seed1.5-VL 68% May 2025 Model card

2 models have held number one since its release in Nov 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

ByteDance Seed
Lab claims 2 leaders
Seed1.8 84.4%

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed1.8 Seed1.5-VL 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed1.8 Seed1.5-VL

Labs headline it less often now, last in Sep 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

ByteDance Seed
Qwen
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
18 Sep 2026 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 80.8 StreamingBench Audio-Visual Interaction
18 Dec 2025 Seed1.8 84.4 StreamingBench (proactive)
12 May 2025 Seed1.5-VL 68 StreamingBench (proactive), thinking 68.0 (non-thinking 82.8)

3 system cards report it, from 2 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
22 Sep 2026 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash technical report 80.8 StreamingBench (Table 5) Capabilities
21 Mar 2026 Seed1.8 model card 84.4 StreamingBench, proactive (Table 3) Capabilities
11 May 2025 Seed1.5-VL technical report 68 StreamingBench (proactive), thinking (Table 7). Non-thinking 82.8 Capabilities

More in Audio and video

All 168 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%
  • TVBench In use Models answer multiple-choice questions on 10 temporal video tasks, such as action counting and ordering, that static frames cannot solve. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 81.9%