QVHighlights
Natural-language queries over YouTube videos. Model localizes relevant moments, scored by Recall@1 at IoU 0.5.
In the authors’ words
Detecting customized moments and highlights from videos given natural language (NL) user queries is an important but under-studied topic. One of the challenges in pursuing this direction is the lack of annotated data. To address this issue, we present the Query-based Video Highlights (QVHIGHLIGHTS) dataset. It consists of over 10,000 YouTube videos, covering a wide range of topics, from everyday activities and travel in lifestyle vlog videos to social and political activities in news videos. Each video in the dataset is annotated with: (1) a human-written free-form NL query, (2) relevant moments in the video w.r.t. the query, and (3) five-point scale saliency scores for all query-relevant clips. This comprehensive annotation enables us to develop and evaluate systems that detect relevant moments as well as salient highlights for diverse, flexible user queries. We also present a strong baseline for this task, Moment-DETR, a transformer encoder-decoder model that views moment retrieval as a direct set prediction problem, taking extracted video and query representations as inputs and predicting moment coordinates and saliency scores end-to-end. While our model does not utilize any human prior, we show that it performs competitively when compared to well-engineered architectures. With weakly supervised pretraining using ASR captions, MomentDETR substantially outperforms previous methods. Lastly, we present several ablations and visualizations of Moment-DETR. Data and code is publicly available at https://github.com/jayleicn/moment_detr
- Level
- Everyday Most adults, without training
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
Nova 2 Lite leads with 77.2% among models released by Dec 2025
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
The newest model with a score here came out in Dec 2025, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 16 more
- 1
Nova 2 Lite 77.2%
- 2
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview 76.7%
- 3
Nova 2 Omni Preview 76.7%
- 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 75%
- 5
Gemini 2.5 Flash Jun 2025 52.4%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 77.2% | Dec 2025 | Model card | |
| 2 | | 76.7% | Dec 2025 | Model card | |
| 3 | | 76.7% | Dec 2025 | Model card | |
| 4 | | 75% | Jul 2025 | Model card | |
| 5 | | 52.4% | Jul 2025 | Model card |
2 models have held number one since 2023
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Labs headline it less often now, last in Dec 2025
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 Dec 2025 | 76.7 | QVHighlights R1@0.5 | |
| 2 Dec 2025 | 77.2 | QVHighlights R1@0.5 | |
| 2 Dec 2025 | 76.7 | QVHighlights R1@0.5 |
5 system cards report it, from 2 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 Dec 2025 | | 76.7 | QVHighlights R1@0.5 (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| 2 Dec 2025 | | 77.2 | QVHighlights R1@0.5 (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| 2 Dec 2025 | | 76.7 | QVHighlights R1@0.5 (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| 7 Jul 2025 | | 75 | QVHighlights, val, 4-shot, R1@0.5 (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| 7 Jul 2025 | | 52.4 | QVHighlights, val, 4-shot, R1@0.5 (Table 6) | Capabilities |
More in Audio and video
- Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
- LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization.
Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
- MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
- MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
- VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules.
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%
- TVBench In use Models answer multiple-choice questions on 10 temporal video tasks, such as action counting and ordering, that static frames cannot solve. Scored by accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 81.9%