Benchmark Almanac

OVO-Bench

Seed2.1 Pro 80.7% leads since Jun 2026 Fading

Video models answer questions asked at given timestamps of a video stream in 12 tasks over 644 videos. Tasks cover backward tracing, real-time understanding and forward active responding.

It tests online, streaming video understanding rather than whole-video answers. About 2,800 timestamped annotations.

In the authors’ words

Temporal Awareness, the ability to reason dynamically based on the timestamp when a question is raised, is the key distinction between offline and online video LLMs. Unlike offline models, which rely on complete videos for static, post hoc analysis, online models process video streams incrementally and dynamically adapt their responses based on the timestamp at which the question is posed. Despite its significance, temporal awareness has not been adequately evaluated in existing benchmarks. To fill this gap, we present OVO-Bench (Online-VideO-Benchmark), a novel video benchmark that emphasizes the importance of timestamps for advanced online video understanding capability benchmarking. OVO-Bench evaluates the ability of video LLMs to reason and respond to events occurring at specific timestamps under three distinct scenarios: (1) Backward tracing: trace back to past events to answer the question. (2) Real-time understanding: understand and respond to events as they unfold at the current timestamp. (3) Forward active responding: delay the response until sufficient future information becomes available to answer the question accurately. OVO-Bench comprises 12 tasks, featuring 644 unique videos and approximately human-curated 2,800 fine-grained meta-annotations with precise timestamps. We combine automated generation pipelines with human curation. With these high-quality samples, we further developed an evaluation pipeline to systematically query video LLMs along the video timeline. Evaluations of nine Video-LLMs reveal that, despite advancements on traditional benchmarks, current models struggle with online video understanding, showing a significant gap compared to human agents. We hope OVO-Bench will drive progress in video LLMs and inspire future research in online video reasoning. Our benchmark and code can be accessed at https://github.com/JoeLeelyf/OVO-Bench.

Abstract of OVO-Bench: How Far is Your Video-LLMs from Real-World Online Video Understanding? (arXiv:2501.05510, CC0)
Made by Niu et al. (CVPR 2025) Released Jan 2025 Video understanding All tasks public Last in a launch post Jun 2026 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Jun 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Multiple choice
5
Models scored in lab cards
4
Launch posts list it, from 1 lab
4
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Seed2.1 Pro leads with 80.7% among models released by Jun 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Jun 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Seed2.1 Pro 80.7%
  2. 2 Seed2.0 Pro 77%
  3. 3 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 75.4%
  4. 4 Seed1.8 72.6%
  5. 5 Seed1.5-VL 72.3%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Seed2.1 Pro 80.7% Jun 2026 Model card
2 Seed2.0 Pro 77% Feb 2026 Model card
3 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 75.4% Apr 2026 Model card
4 Seed1.8 72.6% Dec 2025 Model card
5 Seed1.5-VL 72.3% May 2025 Model card

4 models have held number one since its release in Jan 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

ByteDance Seed
Lab claims Not tested since Jun 2026
Seed2.1 Pro 80.7%

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed2.1 Pro Seed2.0 Pro Seed1.8 Seed1.5-VL 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed2.1 Pro Seed1.8

Labs headline it less often now, last in Jun 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

ByteDance Seed
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
23 Jun 2026 Seed2.1 Pro 80.7 OVOBench
28 Apr 2026 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 75.4 OVOBench
18 Dec 2025 Seed1.8 72.6 OVOBench
12 May 2025 Seed1.5-VL 72.3 OVOBench

4 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
23 Jun 2026 Seed2.1 Pro model card 80.7 OVOBench (Table 10) Capabilities
21 Mar 2026 Seed1.8 model card 72.6 OVOBench (Table 3) Capabilities
14 Feb 2026 Seed2.0 Pro model card 77 OVOBench (Table 9) Capabilities
11 May 2025 Seed1.5-VL technical report 72.3 OVOBench, thinking (Table 7). Non-thinking 72.0 Capabilities

More in Audio and video

All 168 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%
  • TVBench In use Models answer multiple-choice questions on 10 temporal video tasks, such as action counting and ordering, that static frames cannot solve. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 81.9%