Benchmark Almanac

OVBench

Seed2.1 Pro 70% leads since Jun 2026 Fading

Video models answer questions about past, current and future moments of an online video stream in 6 task types and 16 subtasks.

Published at CVPR 2025 with the VideoChat-Online model. It is a different test from OVO-Bench.

In the authors’ words

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have significantly progressed in offline video understanding. However, applying these models to real-world scenarios, such as autonomous driving and human-computer interaction, presents unique challenges due to the need for real-time processing of continuous online video streams. To this end, this paper presents systematic efforts from three perspectives: evaluation benchmark, model architecture, and training strategy. First, we introduce OVBench, a comprehensive question-answering benchmark designed to evaluate models' ability to perceive, memorize, and reason within online video contexts. It features 6 core task types across three temporal contexts-past, current, and future-forming 16 subtasks from diverse datasets. Second, we propose a new Pyramid Memory Bank (PMB) that effectively retains key spatiotemporal information in video streams. Third, we proposed an offline-to-online learning paradigm, designing an interleaved dialogue format for online video data and constructing an instruction-tuning dataset tailored for online video training. This framework led to the development of VideoChat-Online, a robust and efficient model for online video understanding. Despite the lower computational cost and higher efficiency, VideoChat-Online outperforms existing state-of-the-art offline and online models across popular offline video benchmarks and OVBench, demonstrating the effectiveness of our model architecture and training strategy. % Our approach surpasses existing state-of-the-art offline models Qwen2-VL 7B and online models Flash-VStream, by 4.19% and 23.7% on OVBench, respectively.

Abstract of Online Video Understanding: OVBench and VideoChat-Online (arXiv:2501.00584, CC0)
Made by Nanjing University MCG (Huang et al.) Released Dec 2024 Video understanding All tasks public Last in a launch post Jun 2026 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Jun 2026 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Multiple choice
5
Models scored in lab cards
4
Launch posts list it, from 1 lab
4
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Seed2.1 Pro leads with 70% among models released by Jun 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Jun 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Seed2.1 Pro 70%
  2. 2 Seed2.0 Pro 69.2%
  3. 3 Seed1.8 65.1%
  4. 4 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 63.2%
  5. 5 Seed1.5-VL 60%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Seed2.1 Pro 70% Jun 2026 Model card
2 Seed2.0 Pro 69.2% Feb 2026 Model card
3 Seed1.8 65.1% Dec 2025 Model card
4 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 63.2% Apr 2026 Model card
5 Seed1.5-VL 60% May 2025 Model card

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 15 entries, 7 of them models we track. We plot every source in the charts below.

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

Google DeepMind ByteDance Seed
Own leaderboard Not tested since Dec 2024
Lab claims Not tested since Jun 2026

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed2.1 Pro Seed1.8 Seed1.5-VL Gemini 1.5 Flash LongVA-7B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed2.1 Pro Seed1.5-VL

Labs headline it less often now, last in Jun 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

ByteDance Seed
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
23 Jun 2026 Seed2.1 Pro 70 OVBench
28 Apr 2026 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 63.2 OVBench
18 Dec 2025 Seed1.8 65.1 OVBench
12 May 2025 Seed1.5-VL 60 OVBench

4 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
23 Jun 2026 Seed2.1 Pro model card 70 OVBench (Table 10) Capabilities
21 Mar 2026 Seed1.8 model card 65.1 OVBench (Table 3) Capabilities
14 Feb 2026 Seed2.0 Pro model card 69.2 OVBench (Table 9) Capabilities
11 May 2025 Seed1.5-VL technical report 60 OVBench, thinking (Table 7). Non-thinking 59.6 Capabilities

More in Audio and video

All 168 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%
  • TVBench In use Models answer multiple-choice questions on 10 temporal video tasks, such as action counting and ordering, that static frames cannot solve. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 81.9%