Benchmark Almanac

Open ASR Leaderboard

Phi-4-multimodal 6.14% Fading

Speech recognition models transcribe the test sets of several English and multilingual corpora. Scored by average word error rate, with speed reported next to it.

Built on the ESB test sets. ASR model cards often report its average WER.

In the authors’ words

We present the Open ASR Leaderboard, a reproducible benchmarking platform with community contributions from academia and industry. It compares 86 open-source and proprietary systems across 12 datasets, with English short- and long-form and multilingual short-form tracks. We standardize word error rate (WER) and inverse real-time factor (RTFx) evaluation for consistent accuracy-efficiency comparisons across model architectures and toolkits (e.g., ESPNet, NeMo, SpeechBrain, Transformers). We observe that Conformer-based encoders paired with transformer-based decoders achieve the best average WER, while connectionist temporal classification (CTC) and token-and-duration transducer (TDT) decoders offer superior RTFx, making them better suited for long-form and batched processing. All code and dataset loaders are open-sourced to support transparent, extensible evaluation. We present our evaluation methodology to facilitate community-driven benchmarking in ASR and other tasks.

Abstract of Open ASR Leaderboard: Towards Reproducible and Transparent Multilingual and Long-Form Speech Recognition Evaluation (arXiv:2510.06961, CC0)
Made by Hugging Face (hf-audio) and collaborators Released Sep 2023 Speech recognition and translation All tasks public Last in a launch post Mar 2026 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Oct 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
1
Model scored in lab cards
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
3
System cards report it, from 2 labs

Phi-4-multimodal leads with 6.14%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Phi-4-multimodal 6.14%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Phi-4-multimodal 6.14% Mar 2025 Model card

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Phi-4-multimodal 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Phi-4-multimodal

Labs headline it less often now, last in Mar 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Cohere
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
26 Mar 2026 Cohere Transcribe 5.42 Hugging Face Open ASR Leaderboard average WER, as of 2026-03-26

3 system cards report it, from 2 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
23 Oct 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B technical report 9.28 OpenASR (WER), lower is better, non-reasoning (Table 8) Capabilities
27 Apr 2026 Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B technical report 5.95 OpenASR Avg WER, English subset, lower is better, reasoning off (Table 8). AMI 11.09, Earnings22 11.27, GigaSpeech 9.66, LibriSpeech clean 1.57, other 2.96, SPGISpeech 1.98, TED-LIUM 3.44, VoxPopuli 5.6 Capabilities
3 Mar 2025 Phi-4-multimodal technical report 6.14 OpenASR, average WER over 8 sets, lower is better (Tables 3 and 4) Capabilities

More in Audio and video

All 168 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%
  • TVBench In use Models answer multiple-choice questions on 10 temporal video tasks, such as action counting and ordering, that static frames cannot solve. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 81.9%