OfficeQA Pro
Models answer the 133 hardest OfficeQA questions by finding tables in U.S. Treasury Bulletin documents and computing exact numeric answers.
Harder subset of OfficeQA recommended for frontier models. Kept apart from the full OfficeQA set.
In the authors’ words
We introduce OfficeQA Pro, a benchmark for evaluating AI agents on grounded, multi-document reasoning over a large and heterogeneous document corpus. The corpus consists of U.S. Treasury Bulletins spanning nearly 100 years, comprising 89,000 pages and over 26 million numerical values. OfficeQA Pro consists of 133 questions that require precise document parsing, retrieval, and analytical reasoning across both unstructured text and tabular data. Frontier LLMs including Claude Opus 4.6, GPT-5.4, and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview achieve less than 5% accuracy on OfficeQA Pro when relying on parametric knowledge, and less than 12% with additional access to the web. When provided directly with the document corpus, frontier agents still struggle on over half of questions, scoring 34.1% on average. We find that providing agents with a structured document representation produced by Databricks' ai_parse_document yields a 16.1% average relative performance gain across agents. We conduct additional ablations to study the effects of model selection, table representation, retrieval strategy, and test-time scaling on performance. Despite these improvements, significant headroom remains before agents can be considered reliable at enterprise-grade grounded reasoning.
- Level
- University Undergraduates and entry-level professionals
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
Claude Opus 4.7 leads with 80.6%
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
- 1 Claude Opus 4.7 80.6%
- 2
Seed2.1 Pro 70.9%
- 3 Claude Fable 5.1 69%
- 4 Claude Opus 5.5 67.7%
- 5 Kimi K3.1 Pro 67.4%
- 6 Claude Opus 5 66.9%
- 7 Claude Opus 4.8 66.2%
- 8
Tencent Hy4 preview 66.2%
- 9 Claude Sonnet 5.5 65.6%
- 10 GLM-5.3-Flash 62.4%
- 11
Step 5 Preview 60.3%
- 12 Claude Haiku 5.5 60.3%
- 13 Claude Sonnet 5 59.4%
- 14 Claude Fable 5 57.9%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Opus 4.7 | 80.6% | Apr 2026 | Model card | |
| 2 | | 70.9% | Jun 2026 | Model card | |
| 3 | Claude Fable 5.1 | 69% | Sep 2026 | Model card | |
| 4 | Claude Opus 5.5 | 67.7% | Sep 2026 | Model card | |
| 5 | Kimi K3.1 Pro | 67.4% | Oct 2026 | Model card | |
| 6 | Claude Opus 5 | 66.9% | Jul 2026 | Model card | |
| 7 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 66.2% | May 2026 | Model card | |
| 8 | | 66.2% | Aug 2026 | Model card | |
| 9 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 65.6% | Sep 2026 | Model card | |
| 10 | GLM-5.3-Flash | 62.4% | Aug 2026 | Model card | |
| 11 | | 60.3% | Sep 2026 | Model card | |
| 12 | Claude Haiku 5.5 | 60.3% | Oct 2026 | Model card | |
| 13 | Claude Sonnet 5 | 59.4% | Jun 2026 | Model card | |
| 14 | Claude Fable 5 | 57.9% | Jun 2026 | Model card |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
4 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24 Oct 2026 | Kimi K3.1 Pro | 67.4 | OfficeQA Pro |
| 20 Sep 2026 | 60.3 | OfficeQA Pro | |
| 28 Aug 2026 | 66.2 | OfficeQA Pro | |
| 26 Aug 2026 | GLM-5.3-Flash | 62.4 | OfficeQA Pro (Treasury Bulletin PDFs, no embedded text) |
10 system cards report it, from 2 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 Oct 2026 | Claude Haiku 5.5 system card | 60.3 | OfficeQA Pro, max effort, mean of five runs (8.10.1) | Capabilities |
| 28 Sep 2026 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 system card | 65.6 | OfficeQA Pro at max effort (8.14.1) | Capabilities |
| 22 Sep 2026 | Claude Opus 5.5 system card | 67.7 | OfficeQA Pro, 133 questions, max effort, mean of five runs (8.14.1) | Capabilities |
| 1 Sep 2026 | Claude Fable 5.1 system card | 69 | OfficeQA Pro, extracted text with code tools, public API with production safeguards (8.15.1) | Capabilities |
| 24 Jul 2026 | Claude Opus 5 system card | 66.9 | OfficeQA Pro, 133 questions, extracted text with code tools, public API with production safeguards (8.13.1) | Capabilities |
| 30 Jun 2026 | Claude Sonnet 5 system card | 59.4 | OfficeQA Pro, 133 questions, exact match, max effort, mean of five trials (8.11.1, Figure 8.11.1.A) | Capabilities |
| 23 Jun 2026 | | 70.9 | OfficeQA-Pro with internal adaptations (Table 1). Office QA Pro [Multimodal] Avg Score 72.2 (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| 9 Jun 2026 | Claude Fable 5 system card | 57.9 | OfficeQA Pro, Databricks' own evaluation with documents read as images (Table 8.1.A, 8.17.1) | Capabilities |
| 28 May 2026 | Claude Opus 4.8 system card | 66.2 | OfficeQA Pro, 133 questions, internal agentic harness, exact match (8.13.1) | Capabilities |
| 16 Apr 2026 | Claude Opus 4.7 system card | 80.6 | OfficeQA Pro, exact-match grading (Table 8.1.A, 8.10.1) | Capabilities |
Versions
More in Economic work
- JobBench In use 130 tasks from 35 occupations workers most want delegated. Agent works through messy reference files, graded by fact-anchored binary rubrics. GLM-5.3 61.4%
- GDPval In use Real work tasks from 44 occupations with reference files. Experts blindly compare model deliverables with expert work. Metric is win-or-tie rate.
Seed2.1 Pro 87.9%
- GDPval-AA v2.1 In use Agents with shell and web access complete 220 GDPval gold tasks from 44 occupations. Blind pairwise comparisons give Elo ratings. Claude Opus 5.5 1,846
- AA-Briefcase v1.1 In use Version 1.1 of Artificial Analysis's multi-hour office work evaluation, with Elo ratings fitted by Crowd-BT. Claude Opus 5.5 1,822
- CoWorkBench In use Agent completes long-horizon productivity tasks across computer science, finance, law and medicine. Qwen in-house scoring (method unpublished).
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 75.3%
- OfficeQA In use Grounded reasoning over a large corpus of U.S. Treasury Bulletin documents: locate tables and compute precise numeric answers. Claude Opus 4.7 86.3%