OfficeQA Pro V2
Agents answer 90 analytical questions using about 120,000 pages of U.S. Treasury Accounts of Receipts and Expenditures from 1793 to 2024. Answers are scored by exact match.
Databricks built it for the Grounded Reasoning Cup and released it on 2026-08-06. It uses a new corpus, so scores are not comparable with OfficeQA Pro. The paper link is the original OfficeQA suite.
In the authors’ words
We introduce OfficeQA Pro, a benchmark for evaluating AI agents on grounded, multi-document reasoning over a large and heterogeneous document corpus. The corpus consists of U.S. Treasury Bulletins spanning nearly 100 years, comprising 89,000 pages and over 26 million numerical values. OfficeQA Pro consists of 133 questions that require precise document parsing, retrieval, and analytical reasoning across both unstructured text and tabular data. Frontier LLMs including Claude Opus 4.6, GPT-5.4, and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview achieve less than 5% accuracy on OfficeQA Pro when relying on parametric knowledge, and less than 12% with additional access to the web. When provided directly with the document corpus, frontier agents still struggle on over half of questions, scoring 34.1% on average. We find that providing agents with a structured document representation produced by Databricks' ai_parse_document yields a 16.1% average relative performance gain across agents. We conduct additional ablations to study the effects of model selection, table representation, retrieval strategy, and test-time scaling on performance. Despite these improvements, significant headroom remains before agents can be considered reliable at enterprise-grade grounded reasoning.
- Level
- University Undergraduates and entry-level professionals
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
Kimi K3.1 Pro leads with 64.4%
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
- 1 Kimi K3.1 Pro 64.4%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kimi K3.1 Pro | 64.4% | Oct 2026 | Model card |
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24 Oct 2026 | Kimi K3.1 Pro | 64.4 | OfficeQA Pro v2 |
Versions
More in Economic work
- JobBench In use 130 tasks from 35 occupations workers most want delegated. Agent works through messy reference files, graded by fact-anchored binary rubrics. GLM-5.3 61.4%
- GDPval In use Real work tasks from 44 occupations with reference files. Experts blindly compare model deliverables with expert work. Metric is win-or-tie rate.
Seed2.1 Pro 87.9%
- GDPval-AA v2.1 In use Agents with shell and web access complete 220 GDPval gold tasks from 44 occupations. Blind pairwise comparisons give Elo ratings. Claude Opus 5.5 1,846
- AA-Briefcase v1.1 In use Version 1.1 of Artificial Analysis's multi-hour office work evaluation, with Elo ratings fitted by Crowd-BT. Claude Opus 5.5 1,822
- CoWorkBench In use Agent completes long-horizon productivity tasks across computer science, finance, law and medicine. Qwen in-house scoring (method unpublished).
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 75.3%
- OfficeQA In use Grounded reasoning over a large corpus of U.S. Treasury Bulletin documents: locate tables and compute precise numeric answers. Claude Opus 4.7 86.3%