Benchmark Almanac

OfficeQA

Claude Opus 4.7 86.3% leads since Apr 2026 In use

Grounded reasoning over a large corpus of U.S. Treasury Bulletin documents: locate tables and compute precise numeric answers.

Pro = 133 hard questions. Pro V2 (90 questions, new corpus) followed. Answers gated on HF to limit crawling.

In the authors’ words

We introduce OfficeQA Pro, a benchmark for evaluating AI agents on grounded, multi-document reasoning over a large and heterogeneous document corpus. The corpus consists of U.S. Treasury Bulletins spanning nearly 100 years, comprising 89,000 pages and over 26 million numerical values. OfficeQA Pro consists of 133 questions that require precise document parsing, retrieval, and analytical reasoning across both unstructured text and tabular data. Frontier LLMs including Claude Opus 4.6, GPT-5.4, and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview achieve less than 5% accuracy on OfficeQA Pro when relying on parametric knowledge, and less than 12% with additional access to the web. When provided directly with the document corpus, frontier agents still struggle on over half of questions, scoring 34.1% on average. We find that providing agents with a structured document representation produced by Databricks' ai_parse_document yields a 16.1% average relative performance gain across agents. We conduct additional ablations to study the effects of model selection, table representation, retrieval strategy, and test-time scaling on performance. Despite these improvements, significant headroom remains before agents can be considered reliable at enterprise-grade grounded reasoning.

Abstract of OfficeQA Pro: An Enterprise Benchmark for End-to-End Grounded Reasoning (arXiv:2603.08655, CC0)
Made by Databricks Released Mar 2026 Documents and spreadsheets All tasks public Last in a launch post Jul 2026 Last model added Oct 2026
Level
University Undergraduates and entry-level professionals
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
12
Models scored in lab cards
5
Launch posts list it, from 3 labs
10
System cards report it, from 3 labs

Claude Opus 4.7 leads with 86.3%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Claude Opus 4.7 86.3%
  2. 2 Claude Fable 5.1 80.2%
  3. 3 Claude Opus 5.5 78.9%
  4. 4 Claude Opus 5 78.1%
  5. 5 Claude Opus 4.8 77.6%
  6. 6 Claude Sonnet 5.5 76.9%
  7. 7 Claude Haiku 5.5 73.5%
  8. 8 Claude Sonnet 5 73.3%
  9. 9 Kimi K3 63.3%
  10. 10 Grok 4.6 63.2%
  11. 11 Claude Fable 5 57.9%
  12. 12 MiniMax-M3 45.1%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude Opus 4.7 86.3% Apr 2026 Model card
2 Claude Fable 5.1 80.2% Sep 2026 Model card
3 Claude Opus 5.5 78.9% Sep 2026 Model card
4 Claude Opus 5 78.1% Jul 2026 Model card
5 Claude Opus 4.8 77.6% May 2026 Model card
6 Claude Sonnet 5.5 76.9% Sep 2026 Model card
7 Claude Haiku 5.5 73.5% Oct 2026 Model card
8 Claude Sonnet 5 73.3% Jun 2026 Model card
9 Kimi K3 63.3% Jul 2026 Model card
10 Grok 4.6 63.2% Aug 2026 Model card
11 Claude Fable 5 57.9% Jun 2026 Model card
12 MiniMax-M3 45.1% Jun 2026 Model card

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Anthropic
Lab claims Passed 85% in Apr 2026, by Claude Opus 4.7

The best score passed 85% in Apr 2026

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Opus 4.7 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Opus 4.7

3 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Anthropic
MiniMax
Moonshot AI
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
16 Jul 2026 Kimi K3 63.3 OfficeQA Pro
9 Jun 2026 Claude Fable 5 57.9 OfficeQA Pro
1 Jun 2026 MiniMax-M3 45.1 OfficeQA Pro
16 Apr 2026 Claude Opus 4.7 80.6 OfficeQA Pro
16 Apr 2026 Claude Opus 4.7 86.3 OfficeQA

10 system cards report it, from 3 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
7 Oct 2026 Claude Haiku 5.5 system card 73.5 OfficeQA, max effort, mean of five runs (8.10.1) Capabilities
28 Sep 2026 Claude Sonnet 5.5 system card 76.9 OfficeQA at max effort, documents preselected as extracted text (8.14.1) Capabilities
22 Sep 2026 Claude Opus 5.5 system card 78.9 OfficeQA, max effort, mean of five runs, extracted text with code tools (8.14.1) Capabilities
1 Sep 2026 Claude Fable 5.1 system card 80.2 OfficeQA, extracted text with code tools, public API with production safeguards (8.15.1) Capabilities
12 Aug 2026 Grok 4.6 model card 63.2 OfficeQA Pro, accuracy, high, Databricks harness (3.4) Capabilities
27 Jul 2026 Kimi K3 technical report 63.3 OfficeQA Pro, PDF corpus rendered as images (Table 2) Capabilities
24 Jul 2026 Claude Opus 5 system card 78.1 OfficeQA, extracted text with code tools, public API with production safeguards (8.13.1) Capabilities
30 Jun 2026 Claude Sonnet 5 system card 73.3 OfficeQA exact match, max effort, mean of five trials, extracted text with code tools (8.11.1, Figure 8.11.1.A) Capabilities
28 May 2026 Claude Opus 4.8 system card 77.6 OfficeQA, internal agentic harness with extracted text and code tools, exact match (8.13.1) Capabilities
16 Apr 2026 Claude Opus 4.7 system card 86.3 OfficeQA, exact-match grading (Table 8.1.A, 8.10.1) Capabilities

More in Economic work

All 91 in Economic work
  • JobBench In use 130 tasks from 35 occupations workers most want delegated. Agent works through messy reference files, graded by fact-anchored binary rubrics. GLM-5.3 61.4%
  • GDPval In use Real work tasks from 44 occupations with reference files. Experts blindly compare model deliverables with expert work. Metric is win-or-tie rate. Seed2.1 Pro 87.9%
  • GDPval-AA v2.1 In use Agents with shell and web access complete 220 GDPval gold tasks from 44 occupations. Blind pairwise comparisons give Elo ratings. Claude Opus 5.5 1,846
  • AA-Briefcase v1.1 In use Version 1.1 of Artificial Analysis's multi-hour office work evaluation, with Elo ratings fitted by Crowd-BT. Claude Opus 5.5 1,822
  • CoWorkBench In use Agent completes long-horizon productivity tasks across computer science, finance, law and medicine. Qwen in-house scoring (method unpublished). Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 75.3%
  • SpreadsheetBench In use Real spreadsheet manipulation questions from Excel forums. Output workbook is checked cell-by-cell against reference solutions. MiniMax-M3 89.3%