Benchmark Almanac

Neptune

Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 87.3% Only in system cards

Models answer multiple-choice questions about long videos that need reasoning over many segments.

Gemini 2.5 report uses the test subset, 0-shot, 1,024 frames.

In the authors’ words

We introduce Neptune, a benchmark for long video understanding that requires reasoning over long time horizons and across different modalities. Many existing video datasets and models are focused on short clips (10s-30s). While some long video datasets do exist, they can often be solved by powerful image models applied per frame (and often to very few frames) in a video, and are usually manually annotated at high cost. In order to mitigate both these problems, we propose a scalable dataset creation pipeline which leverages large models (VLMs and LLMs), to automatically generate dense, time-aligned video captions, as well as tough question answer decoy sets for video segments (up to 15 minutes in length). Our dataset Neptune covers a broad range of long video reasoning abilities and consists of a subset that emphasizes multimodal reasoning. Since existing metrics for open-ended question answering are either rule-based or may rely on proprietary models, we provide a new open source model-based metric GEM to score open-ended responses on Neptune. Benchmark evaluations reveal that most current open-source long video models perform poorly on Neptune, particularly on questions testing temporal ordering, counting and state changes. Through Neptune, we aim to spur the development of more advanced models capable of understanding long videos. The dataset is available at https://github.com/google-deepmind/neptune

Abstract of Neptune: The Long Orbit to Benchmarking Long Video Understanding (arXiv:2412.09582, CC0)
Made by Google DeepMind Released Dec 2024 Long videos All tasks public Last in a system card Jul 2025 Last model added Jul 2025
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Multiple choice
2
Models scored in lab cards
2
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Gemini 2.5 Pro leads with 87.3%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 87.3%
  2. 2 Gemini 2.5 Flash Jun 2025 84.3%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 87.3% Jul 2025 Model card
2 Gemini 2.5 Flash Jun 2025 84.3% Jul 2025 Model card

The best score passed 85% in Jul 2025

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Near the ceiling (85%) Gemini 2.5 Pro 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Near the ceiling (85%) Gemini 2.5 Pro

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

2 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
7 Jul 2025 Gemini 2.5 Pro technical report 87.3 Neptune, test, 0-shot, visual + subtitles (Table 6) Capabilities
7 Jul 2025 Gemini 2.5 Flash technical report 84.3 Neptune, test, 0-shot, visual + subtitles (Table 6) Capabilities

More in Audio and video

All 168 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%
  • TVBench In use Models answer multiple-choice questions on 10 temporal video tasks, such as action counting and ordering, that static frames cannot solve. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 81.9%