Benchmark Almanac

MVBench

Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 79% leads since Mar 2026 Fading

Models answer multiple-choice questions across 20 temporal video tasks that a single frame cannot solve. Scored by accuracy.

TVBench authors found many MVBench questions solvable without temporal reasoning.

In the authors’ words

With the rapid development of Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs), a number of diagnostic benchmarks have recently emerged to evaluate the comprehension capabilities of these models. However, most benchmarks predominantly assess spatial understanding in the static image tasks, while overlooking temporal understanding in the dynamic video tasks. To alleviate this issue, we introduce a comprehensive Multi-modal Video understanding Benchmark, namely MVBench, which covers 20 challenging video tasks that cannot be effectively solved with a single frame. Specifically, we first introduce a novel static-to-dynamic method to define these temporal-related tasks. By transforming various static tasks into dynamic ones, we enable the systematic generation of video tasks that require a broad spectrum of temporal skills, ranging from perception to cognition. Then, guided by the task definition, we automatically convert public video annotations into multiple-choice QA to evaluate each task. On one hand, such a distinct paradigm allows us to build MVBench efficiently, without much manual intervention. On the other hand, it guarantees evaluation fairness with ground-truth video annotations, avoiding the biased scoring of LLMs. Moreover, we further develop a robust video MLLM baseline, i.e., VideoChat2, by progressive multi-modal training with diverse instruction-tuning data. The extensive results on our MVBench reveal that, the existing MLLMs are far from satisfactory in temporal understanding, while our VideoChat2 largely surpasses these leading models by over 15% on MVBench. All models and data are available at https://github.com/OpenGVLab/Ask-Anything.

Abstract of MVBench: A Comprehensive Multi-modal Video Understanding Benchmark (arXiv:2311.17005, CC0)
Made by Shanghai AI Laboratory (OpenGVLab) Released Nov 2023 Video understanding All tasks public Last in a launch post Aug 2026 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Aug 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Multiple choice
15
Models scored in lab cards
13
Launch posts list it, from 6 labs
10
System cards report it, from 5 labs

Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus leads with 79% among models released by Aug 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Aug 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 79%
  2. 2 GLM-5.3-Flash 77.8%
  3. 3 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 77.6%
  4. 4 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 76.6%
  5. 5 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 76.5%
  6. 6 Qwen3.6 27B 75.5%
  7. 7 LongCat-Flash-Omni 75.2%
  8. 8 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 75.2%
  9. 9 GLM-4.6V 74.9%
  10. 10 Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 74.6%
  11. 11 Seed1.5-VL 74.4%
  12. 12 GLM-4.5V 73%
  13. 13 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 70.4%
  14. 14 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 70.3%
  15. 15 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 68.4%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 79% Mar 2026 Model card
2 GLM-5.3-Flash 77.8% Aug 2026 Model card
3 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 77.6% Feb 2026 Model card
4 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 76.6% Feb 2026 Model card
5 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 76.5% Aug 2025 Model card
6 Qwen3.6 27B 75.5% Apr 2026 Model card
7 LongCat-Flash-Omni 75.2% Oct 2025 Model card
8 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 75.2% Nov 2025 Model card
9 GLM-4.6V 74.9% Jan 2026 Model card
10 Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 74.6% Apr 2026 Model card
11 Seed1.5-VL 74.4% May 2025 Model card
12 GLM-4.5V 73% Aug 2025 Model card
13 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 70.4% Jan 2025 Model card
14 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 70.3% Mar 2025 Model card
15 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 68.4% Jul 2025 Model card

5 models have held number one since its release in Nov 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Qwen ByteDance Seed Shanghai AI Lab
Lab claims Not tested since Aug 2026

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus InternVL3.5-241B-A28B Seed1.5-VL Qwen2.5-VL-72B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus Qwen2.5-VL-72B

Labs headline it less often now, last in Aug 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Qwen
Baidu
ByteDance Seed
Z.ai
Shanghai AI Lab
Meituan
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
26 Aug 2026 GLM-5.3-Flash 77.8 MVbench
22 Apr 2026 Qwen3.6 27B 75.5 MVBench
15 Apr 2026 Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 74.6 MVBench
30 Mar 2026 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 79 MVBench
24 Feb 2026 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 76.6 MVBench
16 Feb 2026 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 77.6 MVBench
31 Oct 2025 LongCat-Flash-Omni 75.2 MVBench
25 Aug 2025 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 76.5 MVBench
11 Aug 2025 GLM-4.5V 73 MVBench
12 May 2025 Seed1.5-VL 74.4 MVBench
27 Mar 2025 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 70.3 MVBench
16 Mar 2025 ERNIE 4.5 MVBench
28 Jan 2025 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 70.4 MVBench

10 system cards report it, from 5 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
17 Apr 2026 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus technical report 79 MVBench (Table 6) Capabilities
1 Jan 2026 GLM-4.6V technical report 74.9 MVBench, GLM-4.6V thinking (Table 2) Capabilities
26 Nov 2025 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B technical report 75.2 MVBench (Table 2) Capabilities
31 Oct 2025 LongCat-Flash-Omni technical report 75.2 MVBench (Table 6) Capabilities
25 Aug 2025 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B technical report 76.5 MVBench, 16 frames (Table 2, Table 9) Capabilities
13 Aug 2025 GLM-4.5V technical report 73 MVBench, GLM-4.5V thinking (Table 2) Capabilities
1 Jul 2025 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking technical report 68.4 MVBench, GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking thinking (Table 2) Capabilities
11 May 2025 Seed1.5-VL technical report 74.4 MVBench, thinking (Table 7). Non-thinking 74.3 Capabilities
26 Mar 2025 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B technical report 70.3 MVBench (Table 7) Capabilities
19 Feb 2025 Qwen2.5-VL-72B technical report 70.4 MVBench (Table 8) Capabilities

More in Audio and video

All 168 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%
  • TVBench In use Models answer multiple-choice questions on 10 temporal video tasks, such as action counting and ordering, that static frames cannot solve. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 81.9%