MVBench
Models answer multiple-choice questions across 20 temporal video tasks that a single frame cannot solve. Scored by accuracy.
TVBench authors found many MVBench questions solvable without temporal reasoning.
In the authors’ words
With the rapid development of Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs), a number of diagnostic benchmarks have recently emerged to evaluate the comprehension capabilities of these models. However, most benchmarks predominantly assess spatial understanding in the static image tasks, while overlooking temporal understanding in the dynamic video tasks. To alleviate this issue, we introduce a comprehensive Multi-modal Video understanding Benchmark, namely MVBench, which covers 20 challenging video tasks that cannot be effectively solved with a single frame. Specifically, we first introduce a novel static-to-dynamic method to define these temporal-related tasks. By transforming various static tasks into dynamic ones, we enable the systematic generation of video tasks that require a broad spectrum of temporal skills, ranging from perception to cognition. Then, guided by the task definition, we automatically convert public video annotations into multiple-choice QA to evaluate each task. On one hand, such a distinct paradigm allows us to build MVBench efficiently, without much manual intervention. On the other hand, it guarantees evaluation fairness with ground-truth video annotations, avoiding the biased scoring of LLMs. Moreover, we further develop a robust video MLLM baseline, i.e., VideoChat2, by progressive multi-modal training with diverse instruction-tuning data. The extensive results on our MVBench reveal that, the existing MLLMs are far from satisfactory in temporal understanding, while our VideoChat2 largely surpasses these leading models by over 15% on MVBench. All models and data are available at https://github.com/OpenGVLab/Ask-Anything.
- Level
- Everyday Most adults, without training
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Multiple choice
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus leads with 79% among models released by Aug 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
The newest model with a score here came out in Aug 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 16 more
- 79.0
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus
- 77.8 GLM-5.3-Flash
- 77.6
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
- 76.6
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- 76.5
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B
- 75.5
Qwen3.6 27B
- 75.2
LongCat-Flash-Omni
- 75.2
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B
- 74.9 GLM-4.6V
- 74.6
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B
- 74.4
Seed1.5-VL
- 73.0 GLM-4.5V
- 70.4
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
- 70.3
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
- 68.4 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking
- 1
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 79%
- 2 GLM-5.3-Flash 77.8%
- 3
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 77.6%
- 4
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 76.6%
- 5
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 76.5%
- 6
Qwen3.6 27B 75.5%
- 7
LongCat-Flash-Omni 75.2%
- 8
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 75.2%
- 9 GLM-4.6V 74.9%
- 10
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 74.6%
- 11
Seed1.5-VL 74.4%
- 12 GLM-4.5V 73%
- 13
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 70.4%
- 14
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 70.3%
- 15 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 68.4%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 79% | Mar 2026 | Model card | |
| 2 | GLM-5.3-Flash | 77.8% | Aug 2026 | Model card | |
| 3 | | 77.6% | Feb 2026 | Model card | |
| 4 | | 76.6% | Feb 2026 | Model card | |
| 5 | | 76.5% | Aug 2025 | Model card | |
| 6 | | 75.5% | Apr 2026 | Model card | |
| 7 | | 75.2% | Oct 2025 | Model card | |
| 8 | | 75.2% | Nov 2025 | Model card | |
| 9 | GLM-4.6V | 74.9% | Jan 2026 | Model card | |
| 10 | | 74.6% | Apr 2026 | Model card | |
| 11 | | 74.4% | May 2025 | Model card | |
| 12 | GLM-4.5V | 73% | Aug 2025 | Model card | |
| 13 | | 70.4% | Jan 2025 | Model card | |
| 14 | | 70.3% | Mar 2025 | Model card | |
| 15 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking | 68.4% | Jul 2025 | Model card |
5 models have held number one since its release in Nov 2023
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Labs headline it less often now, last in Aug 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026 | GLM-5.3-Flash | 77.8 | MVbench |
| 22 Apr 2026 | 75.5 | MVBench | |
| 15 Apr 2026 | 74.6 | MVBench | |
| 30 Mar 2026 | 79 | MVBench | |
| 24 Feb 2026 | 76.6 | MVBench | |
| 16 Feb 2026 | 77.6 | MVBench | |
| 31 Oct 2025 | 75.2 | MVBench | |
| 25 Aug 2025 | 76.5 | MVBench | |
| 11 Aug 2025 | GLM-4.5V | 73 | MVBench |
| 12 May 2025 | 74.4 | MVBench | |
| 27 Mar 2025 | 70.3 | MVBench | |
| 16 Mar 2025 | MVBench | ||
| 28 Jan 2025 | 70.4 | MVBench |
10 system cards report it, from 5 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Apr 2026 | | 79 | MVBench (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| 1 Jan 2026 | GLM-4.6V technical report | 74.9 | MVBench, GLM-4.6V thinking (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 26 Nov 2025 | | 75.2 | MVBench (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 31 Oct 2025 | | 75.2 | MVBench (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| 25 Aug 2025 | | 76.5 | MVBench, 16 frames (Table 2, Table 9) | Capabilities |
| 13 Aug 2025 | GLM-4.5V technical report | 73 | MVBench, GLM-4.5V thinking (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 1 Jul 2025 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking technical report | 68.4 | MVBench, GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking thinking (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 11 May 2025 | | 74.4 | MVBench, thinking (Table 7). Non-thinking 74.3 | Capabilities |
| 26 Mar 2025 | | 70.3 | MVBench (Table 7) | Capabilities |
| 19 Feb 2025 | | 70.4 | MVBench (Table 8) | Capabilities |
More in Audio and video
- Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
- LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization.
Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
- MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
- MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
- VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules.
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%
- TVBench In use Models answer multiple-choice questions on 10 temporal video tasks, such as action counting and ordering, that static frames cannot solve. Scored by accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 81.9%