Benchmark Almanac

MotionBench

Seed2.0 Pro 75.2% leads since Feb 2026 Fading

Models answer questions about fine-grained motion in video clips across six motion question types. Scoring is accuracy.

Test answers are hidden and scored through the leaderboard, while the dev set has public answers.

In the authors’ words

In recent years, vision language models (VLMs) have made significant advancements in video understanding. However, a crucial capability - fine-grained motion comprehension - remains under-explored in current benchmarks. To address this gap, we propose MotionBench, a comprehensive evaluation benchmark designed to assess the fine-grained motion comprehension of video understanding models. MotionBench evaluates models' motion-level perception through six primary categories of motion-oriented question types and includes data collected from diverse sources, ensuring a broad representation of real-world video content. Experimental results reveal that existing VLMs perform poorly in understanding fine-grained motions. To enhance VLM's ability to perceive fine-grained motion within a limited sequence length of LLM, we conduct extensive experiments reviewing VLM architectures optimized for video feature compression and propose a novel and efficient Through-Encoder (TE) Fusion method. Experiments show that higher frame rate inputs and TE Fusion yield improvements in motion understanding, yet there is still substantial room for enhancement. Our benchmark aims to guide and motivate the development of more capable video understanding models, emphasizing the importance of fine-grained motion comprehension. Project page: https://motion-bench.github.io .

Abstract of MotionBench: Benchmarking and Improving Fine-grained Video Motion Understanding for Vision Language Models (arXiv:2501.02955, CC0)
Made by Zhipu AI and Tsinghua University (THUDM) Released Jan 2025 Video understanding Public tasks plus a private test set Last in a launch post Apr 2026 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Jun 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Multiple choice
9
Models scored in lab cards
7
Launch posts list it, from 3 labs
8
System cards report it, from 3 labs

Seed2.0 Pro leads with 75.2% among models released by Jun 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Jun 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Seed2.0 Pro 75.2%
  2. 2 Seed2.1 Pro 74.9%
  3. 3 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 72.4%
  4. 4 Seed1.8 70.6%
  5. 5 Kimi K2.5 70.4%
  6. 6 Seed1.5-VL 68.4%
  7. 7 GLM-4.6V 63.6%
  8. 8 GLM-4.5V 62.4%
  9. 9 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 59%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Seed2.0 Pro 75.2% Feb 2026 Model card
2 Seed2.1 Pro 74.9% Jun 2026 Model card
3 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 72.4% Apr 2026 Model card
4 Seed1.8 70.6% Dec 2025 Model card
5 Kimi K2.5 70.4% Jan 2026 Model card
6 Seed1.5-VL 68.4% May 2025 Model card
7 GLM-4.6V 63.6% Jan 2026 Model card
8 GLM-4.5V 62.4% Aug 2025 Model card
9 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 59% Jul 2025 Model card

3 models have held number one since its release in Jan 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

ByteDance Seed
Lab claims Not tested since Jun 2026
Seed2.0 Pro 75.2%

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed2.0 Pro Seed1.8 Seed1.5-VL 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed2.0 Pro Seed1.5-VL

Labs headline it less often now, last in Apr 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

ByteDance Seed
Z.ai
Moonshot AI
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
28 Apr 2026 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 72.4 MotionBench
14 Feb 2026 Seed2.0 Pro 75.2 MotionBench
27 Jan 2026 Kimi K2.5 70.4 MotionBench
18 Dec 2025 Seed1.8 70.6 MotionBench
11 Aug 2025 GLM-4.5V 62.4 MotionBench
1 Jul 2025 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 59 MotionBench
12 May 2025 Seed1.5-VL 68.4 MotionBench

8 system cards report it, from 3 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
23 Jun 2026 Seed2.1 Pro model card 74.9 MotionBench (Table 10) Capabilities
21 Mar 2026 Seed1.8 model card 70.6 MotionBench (Table 3) Capabilities
14 Feb 2026 Seed2.0 Pro model card 75.2 MotionBench (Table 9) Capabilities
30 Jan 2026 Kimi K2.5 technical report 70.4 MotionBench (Table 4) Capabilities
1 Jan 2026 GLM-4.6V technical report 63.6 MotionBench, GLM-4.6V thinking (Table 2) Capabilities
13 Aug 2025 GLM-4.5V technical report 62.4 MotionBench, GLM-4.5V thinking (Table 2) Capabilities
1 Jul 2025 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking technical report 59 MotionBench, GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking thinking (Table 2) Capabilities
11 May 2025 Seed1.5-VL technical report 68.4 MotionBench, thinking (Table 7). Non-thinking 68.4 Capabilities

More in Audio and video

All 168 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%
  • TVBench In use Models answer multiple-choice questions on 10 temporal video tasks, such as action counting and ordering, that static frames cannot solve. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 81.9%