MotionBench
Models answer questions about fine-grained motion in video clips across six motion question types. Scoring is accuracy.
Test answers are hidden and scored through the leaderboard, while the dev set has public answers.
In the authors’ words
In recent years, vision language models (VLMs) have made significant advancements in video understanding. However, a crucial capability - fine-grained motion comprehension - remains under-explored in current benchmarks. To address this gap, we propose MotionBench, a comprehensive evaluation benchmark designed to assess the fine-grained motion comprehension of video understanding models. MotionBench evaluates models' motion-level perception through six primary categories of motion-oriented question types and includes data collected from diverse sources, ensuring a broad representation of real-world video content. Experimental results reveal that existing VLMs perform poorly in understanding fine-grained motions. To enhance VLM's ability to perceive fine-grained motion within a limited sequence length of LLM, we conduct extensive experiments reviewing VLM architectures optimized for video feature compression and propose a novel and efficient Through-Encoder (TE) Fusion method. Experiments show that higher frame rate inputs and TE Fusion yield improvements in motion understanding, yet there is still substantial room for enhancement. Our benchmark aims to guide and motivate the development of more capable video understanding models, emphasizing the importance of fine-grained motion comprehension. Project page: https://motion-bench.github.io .
- Level
- Everyday Most adults, without training
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Multiple choice
Seed2.0 Pro leads with 75.2% among models released by Jun 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
The newest model with a score here came out in Jun 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 16 more
- 1
Seed2.0 Pro 75.2%
- 2
Seed2.1 Pro 74.9%
- 3
Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 72.4%
- 4
Seed1.8 70.6%
- 5 Kimi K2.5 70.4%
- 6
Seed1.5-VL 68.4%
- 7 GLM-4.6V 63.6%
- 8 GLM-4.5V 62.4%
- 9 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 59%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 75.2% | Feb 2026 | Model card | |
| 2 | | 74.9% | Jun 2026 | Model card | |
| 3 | | 72.4% | Apr 2026 | Model card | |
| 4 | | 70.6% | Dec 2025 | Model card | |
| 5 | Kimi K2.5 | 70.4% | Jan 2026 | Model card | |
| 6 | | 68.4% | May 2025 | Model card | |
| 7 | GLM-4.6V | 63.6% | Jan 2026 | Model card | |
| 8 | GLM-4.5V | 62.4% | Aug 2025 | Model card | |
| 9 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking | 59% | Jul 2025 | Model card |
3 models have held number one since its release in Jan 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Labs headline it less often now, last in Apr 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28 Apr 2026 | 72.4 | MotionBench | |
| 14 Feb 2026 | 75.2 | MotionBench | |
| 27 Jan 2026 | Kimi K2.5 | 70.4 | MotionBench |
| 18 Dec 2025 | 70.6 | MotionBench | |
| 11 Aug 2025 | GLM-4.5V | 62.4 | MotionBench |
| 1 Jul 2025 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking | 59 | MotionBench |
| 12 May 2025 | 68.4 | MotionBench |
8 system cards report it, from 3 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 Jun 2026 | | 74.9 | MotionBench (Table 10) | Capabilities |
| 21 Mar 2026 | | 70.6 | MotionBench (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| 14 Feb 2026 | | 75.2 | MotionBench (Table 9) | Capabilities |
| 30 Jan 2026 | Kimi K2.5 technical report | 70.4 | MotionBench (Table 4) | Capabilities |
| 1 Jan 2026 | GLM-4.6V technical report | 63.6 | MotionBench, GLM-4.6V thinking (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 13 Aug 2025 | GLM-4.5V technical report | 62.4 | MotionBench, GLM-4.5V thinking (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 1 Jul 2025 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking technical report | 59 | MotionBench, GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking thinking (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 11 May 2025 | | 68.4 | MotionBench, thinking (Table 7). Non-thinking 68.4 | Capabilities |
More in Audio and video
- Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
- LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization.
Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
- MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
- MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
- VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules.
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%
- TVBench In use Models answer multiple-choice questions on 10 temporal video tasks, such as action counting and ordering, that static frames cannot solve. Scored by accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 81.9%