Benchmark Almanac

MMSU

Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 86.5% leads since Apr 2026 Fading

Models answer questions about spoken language that need its content, its paralinguistic cues such as emotion and pitch, and its phonology.

Qwen reports it as audio understanding.

In the authors’ words

Speech inherently contains rich acoustic information that extends far beyond the textual language. In real-world spoken language understanding, effective interpretation often requires integrating semantic meaning (e.g., content), paralinguistic features (e.g., emotions, speed, pitch) and phonological characteristics (e.g., prosody, intonation, rhythm), which are embedded in speech. While recent multimodal Speech Large Language Models (SpeechLLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in processing audio information, their ability to perform fine-grained perception and complex reasoning in natural speech remains largely unexplored. To address this gap, we introduce MMSU, a comprehensive benchmark designed specifically for understanding and reasoning in spoken language. MMSU comprises 5,000 meticulously curated audio-question-answer triplets across 47 distinct tasks. To ground our benchmark in linguistic theory, we systematically incorporate a wide range of linguistic phenomena, including phonetics, prosody, rhetoric, syntactics, semantics, and paralinguistics. Through a rigorous evaluation of 14 advanced SpeechLLMs, we identify substantial room for improvement in existing models, highlighting meaningful directions for future optimization. MMSU establishes a new standard for comprehensive assessment of spoken language understanding, providing valuable insights for developing more sophisticated human-AI speech interaction systems. MMSU benchmark is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/ddwang2000/MMSU. Evaluation Code is available at https://github.com/dingdongwang/MMSU.

Abstract of MMSU: A Massive Multi-task Spoken Language Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark (arXiv:2506.04779, CC0)
Made by Wang et al. (arXiv 2506.04779) Released Jun 2025 Speech recognition and translation All tasks public Last in a launch post Sep 2026 , dropped after it saturated Last model added Sep 2026
Level
University Undergraduates and entry-level professionals
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Multiple choice
5
Models scored in lab cards
3
Launch posts list it, from 2 labs
4
System cards report it, from 2 labs

Seed2.0 Lite (0428) leads with 86.5%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 86.5%
  2. 2 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 82.8%
  3. 3 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 82.1%
  4. 4 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 69%
  5. 5 MiMo-Audio-7B-Instruct 62.9%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 86.5% Apr 2026 Model card
2 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 82.8% Mar 2026 Model card
3 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 82.1% Sep 2026 Model card
4 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 69% Sep 2025 Model card
5 MiMo-Audio-7B-Instruct 62.9% Sep 2025 Model card

4 models have held number one since its release in Jun 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Xiaomi Corp Qwen ByteDance Seed
Lab claims Passed 85% in Apr 2026, by Seed2.0 Lite (0428)

The best score passed 85% in Apr 2026

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed2.0 Lite (0428) Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B MiMo-Audio-7B-Instruct 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed2.0 Lite (0428) Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B

Labs headline it less often now, last in Sep 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Qwen
ByteDance Seed
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
18 Sep 2026 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 82.1 MMSU Audio Understanding
28 Apr 2026 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 86.5 MMSU
30 Mar 2026 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 82.8 MMSU

4 system cards report it, from 2 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
22 Sep 2026 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash technical report 82.1 MMSU (Table 4) Capabilities
17 Apr 2026 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus technical report 82.8 MMSU (Table 5) Capabilities
22 Sep 2025 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B technical report 69 MMSU, Audio Reasoning, Instruct (Table 7). Thinking 70.2 Capabilities
18 Sep 2025 MiMo-Audio-7B-Instruct technical report 62.9 MMSU Overall, MiMo-Audio-7B-Instruct +Think, Perception 51.71, Reasoning 74.79 (Table 8). Without thinking 61.70 Capabilities

More in Audio and video

All 168 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%
  • TVBench In use Models answer multiple-choice questions on 10 temporal video tasks, such as action counting and ordering, that static frames cannot solve. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 81.9%