MINERVA
Models answer complex video questions that need multi-step reasoning, with reference reasoning traces for grading.
Gemini 2.5 report uses the test subset, 0-shot, 1,024 frames.
In the authors’ words
Multimodal LLMs are turning their focus to video benchmarks, however most video benchmarks only provide outcome supervision, with no intermediate or interpretable reasoning steps. This makes it challenging to assess if models are truly able to combine perceptual and temporal information to reason about videos, or simply get the correct answer by chance or by exploiting linguistic biases. To remedy this, we provide a new video reasoning dataset called MINERVA for modern multimodal models. Each question in the dataset comes with 5 answer choices, as well as detailed, hand-crafted reasoning traces. Our dataset is multimodal, diverse in terms of video domain and length, and consists of complex multi-step questions. Extensive benchmarking shows that our dataset provides a challenge for frontier open-source and proprietary models. We perform fine-grained error analysis to identify common failure modes across various models, and create a taxonomy of reasoning errors. We use this to explore both human and LLM-as-a-judge methods for scoring video reasoning traces, and find that failure modes are primarily related to temporal localization, followed by visual perception errors, as opposed to logical or completeness errors. The dataset, along with questions, answer candidates and reasoning traces will be publicly available under https://github.com/google-deepmind/neptune?tab=readme-ov-file#minerva.
- Level
- University Undergraduates and entry-level professionals
- Scored
- Graded by a model A language model scores each response, usually against a rubric.
- Answers
- Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
Seed2.1 Pro leads with 70.7% among models released by Jun 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
The newest model with a score here came out in Jun 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 16 more
- 1
Seed2.1 Pro 70.7%
- 2
Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 68.5%
- 3
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 67.6%
- 4
Seed2.0 Pro 66.5%
- 5
Seed1.8 62.4%
- 6
Gemini 2.5 Flash Jun 2025 60.7%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 70.7% | Jun 2026 | Model card | |
| 2 | | 68.5% | Apr 2026 | Model card | |
| 3 | | 67.6% | Jul 2025 | Model card | |
| 4 | | 66.5% | Feb 2026 | Model card | |
| 5 | | 62.4% | Dec 2025 | Model card | |
| 6 | | 60.7% | Jul 2025 | Model card |
3 models have held number one since its release in May 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Labs headline it less often now, last in Jun 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23 Jun 2026 | 70.7 | Minerva | |
| 28 Apr 2026 | 68.5 | Minerva | |
| 18 Dec 2025 | 62.4 | Minerva |
5 system cards report it, from 2 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 Jun 2026 | | 70.7 | Minerva (Table 10) | Capabilities |
| 21 Mar 2026 | | 62.4 | Minerva (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| 14 Feb 2026 | | 66.5 | Minerva, with subtitles (Table 9) | Capabilities |
| 7 Jul 2025 | | 67.6 | Minerva, test, 0-shot, visual + subtitles (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| 7 Jul 2025 | | 60.7 | Minerva, test, 0-shot, visual + subtitles (Table 6) | Capabilities |
More in Audio and video
- Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
- LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization.
Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
- MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
- MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
- VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules.
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%
- TVBench In use Models answer multiple-choice questions on 10 temporal video tasks, such as action counting and ordering, that static frames cannot solve. Scored by accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 81.9%