Benchmark Almanac

LongVideoBench

Seed2.1 Pro 80.6% leads since Jun 2026 Fading

Models answer referring reasoning questions over 3,763 web videos up to an hour long, with interleaved subtitles. Scored by multiple-choice accuracy.

In the authors’ words

Large multimodal models (LMMs) are processing increasingly longer and richer inputs. Albeit the progress, few public benchmark is available to measure such development. To mitigate this gap, we introduce LongVideoBench, a question-answering benchmark that features video-language interleaved inputs up to an hour long. Our benchmark includes 3,763 varying-length web-collected videos with their subtitles across diverse themes, designed to comprehensively evaluate LMMs on long-term multimodal understanding. To achieve this, we interpret the primary challenge as to accurately retrieve and reason over detailed multimodal information from long inputs. As such, we formulate a novel video question-answering task termed referring reasoning. Specifically, as part of the question, it contains a referring query that references related video contexts, called referred context. The model is then required to reason over relevant video details from the referred context. Following the paradigm of referring reasoning, we curate 6,678 human-annotated multiple-choice questions in 17 fine-grained categories, establishing one of the most comprehensive benchmarks for long-form video understanding. Evaluations suggest that the LongVideoBench presents significant challenges even for the most advanced proprietary models (e.g. GPT-4o, Gemini-1.5-Pro, GPT-4-Turbo), while their open-source counterparts show an even larger performance gap. In addition, our results indicate that model performance on the benchmark improves only when they are capable of processing more frames, positioning LongVideoBench as a valuable benchmark for evaluating future-generation long-context LMMs.

Abstract of LongVideoBench: A Benchmark for Long-context Interleaved Video-Language Understanding (arXiv:2407.15754, CC0)
Made by NTU S-Lab et al. Released Jul 2024 Long videos Public tasks plus a private test set Last in a launch post May 2026 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Jun 2026 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Multiple choice
11
Models scored in lab cards
7
Launch posts list it, from 5 labs
10
System cards report it, from 7 labs

Seed2.1 Pro leads with 80.6% among models released by Jun 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Jun 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Seed2.1 Pro 80.6%
  2. 2 Seed2.0 Pro 80.3%
  3. 3 Kimi K2.5 79.8%
  4. 4 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 79%
  5. 5 Seed1.8 77.4%
  6. 6 Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B 74.1%
  7. 7 Seed1.5-VL 74%
  8. 8 LongCat-Flash-Omni 69.3%
  9. 9 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 67.1%
  10. 10 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 60.7%
  11. 11 Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL 57%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Seed2.1 Pro 80.6% Jun 2026 Model card
2 Seed2.0 Pro 80.3% Feb 2026 Model card
3 Kimi K2.5 79.8% Jan 2026 Model card
4 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 79% Apr 2026 Model card
5 Seed1.8 77.4% Dec 2025 Model card
6 Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B 74.1% May 2026 Model card
7 Seed1.5-VL 74% May 2025 Model card
8 LongCat-Flash-Omni 69.3% Oct 2025 Model card
9 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 67.1% Aug 2025 Model card
10 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 60.7% Feb 2025 Model card
11 Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL 57% Nov 2025 Model card

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 22 entries, 13 of them models we track. We plot every source in the charts below.

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

OpenAI Qwen ByteDance Seed Moonshot AI
Own leaderboard Not tested since Jul 2024
GPT-4o 66.7%
Lab claims Not tested since Jun 2026
Seed2.1 Pro 80.6%

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2023 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed2.1 Pro Seed1.5-VL GPT-4o GPT-4 Turbo llava-v1.6-mistral-7b InstructBLIP FLAN-T5-XXL 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2023 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed2.1 Pro Seed1.5-VL

Labs headline it less often now, last in May 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

ByteDance Seed
Shanghai AI Lab
Meituan
Moonshot AI
Kuaishou
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
25 May 2026 Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B 74.1 LongVideoBench
28 Apr 2026 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 79 LongVideoBench
27 Jan 2026 Kimi K2.5 79.8 LongVideoBench
18 Dec 2025 Seed1.8 77.4 LongVideoBench
31 Oct 2025 LongCat-Flash-Omni 69.3 LongVideoBench
25 Aug 2025 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 67.1 LongVideoBench
12 May 2025 Seed1.5-VL 74 LongVideoBench

10 system cards report it, from 7 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
23 Jun 2026 Seed2.1 Pro model card 80.6 LongVideoBench (Table 10) Capabilities
9 Jun 2026 Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B technical report 74.1 LongVideoBench (Table 2) Capabilities
21 Mar 2026 Seed1.8 model card 77.4 LongVideoBench (Table 3) Capabilities
14 Feb 2026 Seed2.0 Pro model card 80.3 LongVideoBench (Table 9) Capabilities
30 Jan 2026 Kimi K2.5 technical report 79.8 LongVideoBench (Table 4) Capabilities
6 Nov 2025 Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL technical report 57 LongVideoBench, reasoning on (Table 3). Reasoning off 63.6 Capabilities
31 Oct 2025 LongCat-Flash-Omni technical report 69.3 LongVideoBench (Table 6) Capabilities
25 Aug 2025 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B technical report 67.1 LongVideoBench (val total) (Table 2, Table 9) Capabilities
11 May 2025 Seed1.5-VL technical report 74 LongVideoBench, thinking (Table 7). Non-thinking 74.4 Capabilities
19 Feb 2025 Qwen2.5-VL-72B technical report 60.7 LongVideoBench val (Table 8) Capabilities

More in Audio and video

All 168 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%
  • TVBench In use Models answer multiple-choice questions on 10 temporal video tasks, such as action counting and ordering, that static frames cannot solve. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 81.9%