LongVideoBench
Models answer referring reasoning questions over 3,763 web videos up to an hour long, with interleaved subtitles. Scored by multiple-choice accuracy.
In the authors’ words
Large multimodal models (LMMs) are processing increasingly longer and richer inputs. Albeit the progress, few public benchmark is available to measure such development. To mitigate this gap, we introduce LongVideoBench, a question-answering benchmark that features video-language interleaved inputs up to an hour long. Our benchmark includes 3,763 varying-length web-collected videos with their subtitles across diverse themes, designed to comprehensively evaluate LMMs on long-term multimodal understanding. To achieve this, we interpret the primary challenge as to accurately retrieve and reason over detailed multimodal information from long inputs. As such, we formulate a novel video question-answering task termed referring reasoning. Specifically, as part of the question, it contains a referring query that references related video contexts, called referred context. The model is then required to reason over relevant video details from the referred context. Following the paradigm of referring reasoning, we curate 6,678 human-annotated multiple-choice questions in 17 fine-grained categories, establishing one of the most comprehensive benchmarks for long-form video understanding. Evaluations suggest that the LongVideoBench presents significant challenges even for the most advanced proprietary models (e.g. GPT-4o, Gemini-1.5-Pro, GPT-4-Turbo), while their open-source counterparts show an even larger performance gap. In addition, our results indicate that model performance on the benchmark improves only when they are capable of processing more frames, positioning LongVideoBench as a valuable benchmark for evaluating future-generation long-context LMMs.
- Level
- Everyday Most adults, without training
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Multiple choice
Seed2.1 Pro leads with 80.6% among models released by Jun 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
The newest model with a score here came out in Jun 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 16 more
- 1
Seed2.1 Pro 80.6%
- 2
Seed2.0 Pro 80.3%
- 3 Kimi K2.5 79.8%
- 4
Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 79%
- 5
Seed1.8 77.4%
- 6
Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B 74.1%
- 7
Seed1.5-VL 74%
- 8
LongCat-Flash-Omni 69.3%
- 9
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 67.1%
- 10
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 60.7%
- 11
Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL 57%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 80.6% | Jun 2026 | Model card | |
| 2 | | 80.3% | Feb 2026 | Model card | |
| 3 | Kimi K2.5 | 79.8% | Jan 2026 | Model card | |
| 4 | | 79% | Apr 2026 | Model card | |
| 5 | | 77.4% | Dec 2025 | Model card | |
| 6 | | 74.1% | May 2026 | Model card | |
| 7 | | 74% | May 2025 | Model card | |
| 8 | | 69.3% | Oct 2025 | Model card | |
| 9 | | 67.1% | Aug 2025 | Model card | |
| 10 | | 60.7% | Feb 2025 | Model card | |
| 11 | | 57% | Nov 2025 | Model card |
The benchmark's own leaderboard has 22 entries, 13 of them models we track. We plot every source in the charts below.
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Labs headline it less often now, last in May 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25 May 2026 | 74.1 | LongVideoBench | |
| 28 Apr 2026 | 79 | LongVideoBench | |
| 27 Jan 2026 | Kimi K2.5 | 79.8 | LongVideoBench |
| 18 Dec 2025 | 77.4 | LongVideoBench | |
| 31 Oct 2025 | 69.3 | LongVideoBench | |
| 25 Aug 2025 | 67.1 | LongVideoBench | |
| 12 May 2025 | 74 | LongVideoBench |
10 system cards report it, from 7 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 Jun 2026 | | 80.6 | LongVideoBench (Table 10) | Capabilities |
| 9 Jun 2026 | | 74.1 | LongVideoBench (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 21 Mar 2026 | | 77.4 | LongVideoBench (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| 14 Feb 2026 | | 80.3 | LongVideoBench (Table 9) | Capabilities |
| 30 Jan 2026 | Kimi K2.5 technical report | 79.8 | LongVideoBench (Table 4) | Capabilities |
| 6 Nov 2025 | | 57 | LongVideoBench, reasoning on (Table 3). Reasoning off 63.6 | Capabilities |
| 31 Oct 2025 | | 69.3 | LongVideoBench (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| 25 Aug 2025 | | 67.1 | LongVideoBench (val total) (Table 2, Table 9) | Capabilities |
| 11 May 2025 | | 74 | LongVideoBench, thinking (Table 7). Non-thinking 74.4 | Capabilities |
| 19 Feb 2025 | | 60.7 | LongVideoBench val (Table 8) | Capabilities |
More in Audio and video
- Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
- LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization.
Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
- MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
- MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
- VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules.
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%
- TVBench In use Models answer multiple-choice questions on 10 temporal video tasks, such as action counting and ordering, that static frames cannot solve. Scored by accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 81.9%