FinEval 6.0
Models solve financial evaluation tasks. The score is the official 6.0 total score.
Distinct result table with different tasks and scoring from the earlier text aggregate.
- Made by
- Shanghai University of Finance and Economics (AIFLM Lab)
- Released
- August 2023
- Kind
- Finance
- Level
- University
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Tasks
- Public, plus a private test set
- Strongest model tested
-
Qwen3-32B #134 on the capability index
- Last model added
- April 2025
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Large language models have demonstrated outstanding performance in various natural language processing tasks, but their security capabilities in the financial domain have not been explored, and their performance on complex tasks like financial agent remains unknown. This paper presents FinEval, a benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs' financial domain knowledge and practical abilities. The dataset contains 8,351 questions categorized into four different key areas: Financial Academic Knowledge, Financial Industry Knowledge, Financial Security Knowledge, and Financial Agent. Financial Academic Knowledge comprises 4,661 multiple-choice questions spanning 34 subjects such as finance and economics. Financial Industry Knowledge contains 1,434 questions covering practical scenarios like investment research. Financial Security Knowledge assesses models through 1,640 questions on topics like application security and cryptography. Financial Agent evaluates tool usage and complex reasoning with 616 questions. FinEval has multiple evaluation settings, including zero-shot, five-shot with chain-of-thought, and assesses model performance using objective and subjective criteria. Our results show that Claude 3.5-Sonnet achieves the highest weighted average score of 72.9 across all financial domain categories under zero-shot setting. Our work provides a comprehensive benchmark closely aligned with Chinese financial domain.
Finix-CI-72B tops the leaderboard with 86.1%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Qwen3-32B, at 80.9%.
The newest model with a score here came out in April 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 1 Finix-CI-72B zero-shot 86.1%
- 2 DeepSeek-RI zero-shot 85.3%
- 3 Qwen3-32B (think) zero-shot 84.5%
- 4
Qwen3-32B zero-shot 80.9%
- 5 GLM-ZI-32B-0414 zero-shot 80.1%
- 6
Qwen3-30B-A3B zero-shot 79.9%
- 7
InternLM3-8B-Instruct zero-shot 78.5%
- 8 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) zero-shot 77.7%
- 9
Llama 3.3 70B zero-shot 77.3%
Source: Official FinEval 6.0 leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Finix-CI-72B | 86.1% | zero-shot | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | DeepSeek-RI | 85.3% | zero-shot | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | Qwen3-32B (think) | 84.5% | zero-shot | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 80.9% | zero-shot | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | GLM-ZI-32B-0414 | 80.1% | zero-shot | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | | 79.9% | zero-shot | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | | 78.5% | zero-shot | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) | 77.7% | zero-shot | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | | 77.3% | zero-shot | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard |
3 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in August 2023
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official FinEval 6.0 leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official FinEval 6.0 leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Law, finance and medicine
- MedXpertQA-MM In use Models answer expert-level medical exam questions that combine images with clinical records and test results. Scoring is accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 80.4%
- HealthBench Professional In use 525 physician-authored tasks from real clinician chats (care consult, documentation, research) with physician-adjudicated rubrics. Claude Sonnet 5.5 69.2%
- HealthBench In use 5,000 realistic health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics. A length-adjusted variant penalizes verbosity. GPT-5 67.2%
- FinSearchComp In use Agents search the web to fetch live financial data, look up history, and run multi-step investigations, across 635 expert-written questions. Scored by answer accuracy.
Ling-3.1-flash 81.7%
- KBL In use Models answer Korean legal knowledge and reasoning tasks and Korean bar exam questions. It has 7 knowledge tasks, 4 reasoning tasks and 2,510 bar exam items.
Solar Pro 4 77.5%
- KorMedMCQA In use Models answer 7,469 multiple-choice questions from Korean licensing exams for doctors, nurses, pharmacists and dentists, held from 2012 to 2024.
Solar Pro 4 93.2%