Benchmark Almanac

FinEval 6.0

Finix-CI-72B 86.1% tops its leaderboard Qwen3-32B 80.9% leads the models we track
Not in model cards

Models solve financial evaluation tasks. The score is the official 6.0 total score.

Distinct result table with different tasks and scoring from the earlier text aggregate.

Released
August 2023
Kind
Finance
Level
University
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Multiple choice
Tasks
Public, plus a private test set
Strongest model tested
Qwen3-32B #134 on the capability index
Last model added
April 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Large language models have demonstrated outstanding performance in various natural language processing tasks, but their security capabilities in the financial domain have not been explored, and their performance on complex tasks like financial agent remains unknown. This paper presents FinEval, a benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs' financial domain knowledge and practical abilities. The dataset contains 8,351 questions categorized into four different key areas: Financial Academic Knowledge, Financial Industry Knowledge, Financial Security Knowledge, and Financial Agent. Financial Academic Knowledge comprises 4,661 multiple-choice questions spanning 34 subjects such as finance and economics. Financial Industry Knowledge contains 1,434 questions covering practical scenarios like investment research. Financial Security Knowledge assesses models through 1,640 questions on topics like application security and cryptography. Financial Agent evaluates tool usage and complex reasoning with 616 questions. FinEval has multiple evaluation settings, including zero-shot, five-shot with chain-of-thought, and assesses model performance using objective and subjective criteria. Our results show that Claude 3.5-Sonnet achieves the highest weighted average score of 72.9 across all financial domain categories under zero-shot setting. Our work provides a comprehensive benchmark closely aligned with Chinese financial domain.

Abstract of FinEval: A Chinese Financial Domain Knowledge Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Models (arXiv:2308.09975, CC0)
9
Entries on its own leaderboard, 4 models we track

Finix-CI-72B tops the leaderboard with 86.1%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Qwen3-32B, at 80.9%.

The newest model with a score here came out in April 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Finix-CI-72B zero-shot 86.1%
  2. 2 DeepSeek-RI zero-shot 85.3%
  3. 3 Qwen3-32B (think) zero-shot 84.5%
  4. 4 Qwen3-32B zero-shot 80.9%
  5. 5 GLM-ZI-32B-0414 zero-shot 80.1%
  6. 6 Qwen3-30B-A3B zero-shot 79.9%
  7. 7 InternLM3-8B-Instruct zero-shot 78.5%
  8. 8 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) zero-shot 77.7%
  9. 9 Llama 3.3 70B zero-shot 77.3%

Source: Official FinEval 6.0 leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Finix-CI-72B 86.1% zero-shot Official leaderboard
2 DeepSeek-RI 85.3% zero-shot Official leaderboard
3 Qwen3-32B (think) 84.5% zero-shot Official leaderboard
4 Qwen3-32B 80.9% zero-shot Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
5 GLM-ZI-32B-0414 80.1% zero-shot Official leaderboard
6 Qwen3-30B-A3B 79.9% zero-shot Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
7 InternLM3-8B-Instruct 78.5% zero-shot Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
8 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 77.7% zero-shot Official leaderboard
9 Llama 3.3 70B 77.3% zero-shot Dec 2024 Official leaderboard

3 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in August 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Meta Shanghai AI Lab Qwen
Own leaderboard Not tested since Apr 2025
Qwen3-32B 80.9%

Source: Official FinEval 6.0 leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen3-32B InternLM3-8B-Instruct 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen3-32B

Source: Official FinEval 6.0 leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Law, finance and medicine

All 179 in Law, finance and medicine
  • MedXpertQA-MM In use Models answer expert-level medical exam questions that combine images with clinical records and test results. Scoring is accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 80.4%
  • HealthBench Professional In use 525 physician-authored tasks from real clinician chats (care consult, documentation, research) with physician-adjudicated rubrics. Claude Sonnet 5.5 69.2%
  • HealthBench In use 5,000 realistic health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics. A length-adjusted variant penalizes verbosity. GPT-5 67.2%
  • FinSearchComp In use Agents search the web to fetch live financial data, look up history, and run multi-step investigations, across 635 expert-written questions. Scored by answer accuracy. Ling-3.1-flash 81.7%
  • KBL In use Models answer Korean legal knowledge and reasoning tasks and Korean bar exam questions. It has 7 knowledge tasks, 4 reasoning tasks and 2,510 bar exam items. Solar Pro 4 77.5%
  • KorMedMCQA In use Models answer 7,469 multiple-choice questions from Korean licensing exams for doctors, nurses, pharmacists and dentists, held from 2012 to 2024. Solar Pro 4 93.2%