FaithJudge
Models answer retrieval-augmented tasks from given passages. An LLM judge guided by human-annotated examples flags unfaithful answers, giving a hallucination rate.
The board reports the hallucination rate. Kimi K2 reported one minus the rate (92.6), stored here as the rate it also prints (7.4).
In the authors’ words
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) aims to reduce hallucinations by grounding responses in external context, yet large language models (LLMs) still frequently introduce unsupported information or contradictions even when provided with relevant context. This paper presents two complementary efforts at Vectara to measure and benchmark LLM faithfulness in RAG. First, we describe our original hallucination leaderboard, which has tracked hallucination rates for LLMs since 2023 using our HHEM hallucination detection model. Motivated by limitations observed in current hallucination detection methods, we introduce FaithJudge, an LLM-as-a-judge framework that leverages a pool of diverse human-annotated hallucination examples to substantially improve the automated hallucination evaluation of LLMs. We introduce an enhanced hallucination leaderboard centered on FaithJudge that benchmarks LLMs on RAG faithfulness in summarization, question-answering, and data-to-text generation tasks. FaithJudge enables a more reliable benchmarking of LLM hallucinations in RAG and supports the development of more trustworthy generative AI systems: https://github.com/vectara/FaithJudge.
- Level
- Everyday Most adults, without training
- Scored
- Graded by a model A language model scores each response, usually against a rubric.
- Answers
- Open-ended Free-form text, documents, designs or media judged as a whole.
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads with 6.26% among models released by Jun 2025
Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart.
The newest model with a score here came out in Jun 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 16 more
- 1
Gemini 2.5 Flash Jun 2025 6.26%
- 2
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 6.65%
- 3
Gemini 2.5 Pro Mar 2025 7.63%
- 4
DeepSeek-R1 May 2025 9.78%
- 5
Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 10.2%
- 6 o3-mini medium 11.6%
- 7 GPT-4.5 11.9%
- 8 GPT-4.1 11.9%
- 9 Claude Opus 4 thinking 14.1%
- 10 GPT-3.5 Turbo Jan 2024 14.9%
- 11 Grok 3 15.3%
- 12 GPT-4.1 mini 15.7%
- 13 GPT-4o Nov 2024 15.8%
- 14 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 16.1%
- 15
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct 16.4%
- 16
Phi-4 17%
- 17
Mistral Small 3 17%
- 18 o3 medium 17.8%
- 19 Claude Sonnet 4 thinking 18.2%
- 20 GPT-4o mini 18.6%
- 21
Qwen2.5-32B 19.2%
- 22
Llama 4 Maverick 20.6%
- 23
Qwen2.5-72B 20.7%
- 24
QwQ-32B 24.7%
- 25 GLM-4-9B-Chat 25.4%
- 26 o4-mini medium 25.8%
- 27
Llama 3.1-8B 28.4%
- 28
Qwen2.5-14B 29%
- 29
Ministral 8B 30.9%
- 30
Phi-4 Mini 38.4%
- 31
Qwen2.5-7B 38.5%
- 32 Jamba 1.6 Mini 39.1%
- 33
Llama 3.2 3B 46.2%
- 34
Qwen2.5-3B 56%
- 35
Qwen2.5-1.5B 66.7%
- 36
Llama 3.2 1B 67.7%
- 37
Qwen2.5-0.5B 76.3%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 6.26% | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | | 6.65% | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | | 7.63% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 9.78% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | | 10.2% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | o3-mini | 11.6% | medium | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | GPT-4.5 | 11.9% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | GPT-4.1 | 11.9% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | Claude Opus 4 | 14.1% | thinking | May 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | GPT-3.5 Turbo Jan 2024 | 14.9% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | Grok 3 | 15.3% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | GPT-4.1 mini | 15.7% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | GPT-4o Nov 2024 | 15.8% | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 16.1% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | | 16.4% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | | 17% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | | 17% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | o3 | 17.8% | medium | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 19 | Claude Sonnet 4 | 18.2% | thinking | May 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 20 | GPT-4o mini | 18.6% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | | 19.2% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | | 20.6% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | | 20.7% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 24 | | 24.7% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 25 | GLM-4-9B-Chat | 25.4% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 26 | o4-mini | 25.8% | medium | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 27 | | 28.4% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 28 | | 29% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 29 | | 30.9% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 30 | | 38.4% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 31 | | 38.5% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 32 | Jamba 1.6 Mini | 39.1% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 33 | | 46.2% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 34 | | 56% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 35 | | 66.7% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 36 | | 67.7% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 37 | | 76.3% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.
Scores at each effort level
Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.
| Model | Effort | Harness | Score | Cost per task | Output tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | 76.3% | ||||
| | 67.7% | ||||
| | 66.7% | ||||
| | 56% | ||||
| | 46.2% | ||||
| Jamba 1.6 Mini | 39.1% | ||||
| | 38.5% | ||||
| | 38.4% | ||||
| | 30.9% | ||||
| o4-mini | high | 29.9% | |||
| | 29% | ||||
| | 28.4% | ||||
| o4-mini | low | 28% | |||
| o4-mini | medium | 25.8% | |||
| GLM-4-9B-Chat | 25.4% | ||||
| | 24.7% | ||||
| | 20.7% | ||||
| | 20.6% | ||||
| o3 | low | 20.6% | |||
| Claude Opus 4 | 19.6% | ||||
| | 19.2% | ||||
| GPT-4o mini | 18.6% | ||||
| o3 | high | 18.6% | |||
| Claude Sonnet 4 | 18.6% | ||||
| Claude Sonnet 4 | thinking | 18.2% | |||
| o3 | medium | 17.8% | |||
| | 17% | ||||
| | 17% | ||||
| | 16.4% | ||||
| Claude 3.7 Sonnet | thinking | 16.2% | |||
| Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 16.1% | ||||
| GPT-4o Nov 2024 | 15.8% | ||||
| GPT-4.1 mini | 15.7% | ||||
| Grok 3 | 15.3% | ||||
| GPT-3.5 Turbo Jan 2024 | 14.9% | ||||
| Claude Opus 4 | thinking | 14.1% | |||
| o3-mini | high | 12.5% | |||
| o3-mini | low | 11.9% | |||
| GPT-4.5 | 11.9% | ||||
| GPT-4.1 | 11.9% | ||||
| o3-mini | medium | 11.6% | |||
| | 10.2% | ||||
| | 9.78% | ||||
| | 7.63% | ||||
| | 6.65% | ||||
| | 6.26% |
3 models have held number one since its release in May 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Labs report it only in system cards
We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.
One system card reports it
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 Jul 2025 | Kimi K2 technical report | 7.4 | FaithJudge (1-Hallu.), o3-mini judge, hallucination rate 7.4% (Table 3) | Hallucination |
More in Factuality
- SimpleVQA In use Models answer 2,025 short factual questions about images across 9 tasks and 9 topics. An LLM judge grades answers against fixed references.
Qwen3.7-Plus 81.7%
- HallusionBench In use Models answer 1,129 yes or no questions about 346 images, built in pairs to expose language hallucination and visual illusion. Scored by accuracy.
Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B 73.5%
- SimpleQA Verified In use 1,000 human-verified, de-duplicated short-answer factual questions measuring parametric knowledge.
Gemini 3.1 Pro 77.5%
- GaRAGe In use Models write long-form RAG answers to 2,366 questions with human-annotated grounding passages. Scoring checks whether answers use the relevant passages.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 40.7%
- Kimi Hallu Bench In use Models answer hard prompts drawn from practical work tasks. Fact-checking agents score the share of claims that are hallucinated. Kimi K3.1 Pro 8.30%
- RAGTruth In use A word-level annotated corpus of hallucinations in retrieval-augmented generation answers. It is used to train and evaluate hallucination detection and RAG faithfulness.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 77.9%