HallusionBench
Models answer 1,129 yes or no questions about 346 images, built in pairs to expose language hallucination and visual illusion. Scored by accuracy.
In the authors’ words
We introduce HallusionBench, a comprehensive benchmark designed for the evaluation of image-context reasoning. This benchmark presents significant challenges to advanced large visual-language models (LVLMs), such as GPT-4V(Vision), Gemini Pro Vision, Claude 3, and LLaVA-1.5, by emphasizing nuanced understanding and interpretation of visual data. The benchmark comprises 346 images paired with 1129 questions, all meticulously crafted by human experts. We introduce a novel structure for these visual questions designed to establish control groups. This structure enables us to conduct a quantitative analysis of the models' response tendencies, logical consistency, and various failure modes. In our evaluation on HallusionBench, we benchmarked 15 different models, highlighting a 31.42% question-pair accuracy achieved by the state-of-the-art GPT-4V. Notably, all other evaluated models achieve accuracy below 16%. Moreover, our analysis not only highlights the observed failure modes, including language hallucination and visual illusion, but also deepens an understanding of these pitfalls. Our comprehensive case studies within HallusionBench shed light on the challenges of hallucination and illusion in LVLMs. Based on these insights, we suggest potential pathways for their future improvement. The benchmark and codebase can be accessed at https://github.com/tianyi-lab/HallusionBench.
- Level
- Everyday Most adults, without training
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Multiple choice
Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B leads with 73.5% among models released by Aug 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
The newest model with a score here came out in Aug 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 16 more
- 73.5
Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B
- 73.1
Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL
- 71.4
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
- 69.8
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B
- 68.0
Seed2.0 Pro
- 67.6
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- 66.7
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B
- 65.4 GLM-4.5V
- 64.9
STEP3-VL-10B
- 64.4
Phi-4-Reasoning-Vision-15B
- 64.2
Step 3
- 63.9
Seed1.8
- 63.9
ERNIE 5.0
- 63.7
EXAONE 4.5 33B
- 63.2 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking
- 62.3 GLM-4.6V
- 61.5
North Micro Vision Instruct
- 60.4
ERNIE-4.5-VL-28B-A3B-Thinking
- 60.3
Seed1.5-VL
- 59.7
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B
- 57.3
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B
- 55.2
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
- 47.2 LFM2.5-VL-3B
- 1
Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B 73.5%
- 2
Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL 73.1%
- 3
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 71.4%
- 4
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 69.8%
- 5
Seed2.0 Pro 68%
- 6
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 67.6%
- 7
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 66.7%
- 8 GLM-4.5V 65.4%
- 9
STEP3-VL-10B 64.9%
- 10
Phi-4-Reasoning-Vision-15B 64.4%
- 11
Step 3 64.2%
- 12
Seed1.8 63.9%
- 13
ERNIE 5.0 63.9%
- 14
EXAONE 4.5 33B 63.7%
- 15 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 63.2%
- 16 GLM-4.6V 62.3%
- 17
North Micro Vision Instruct 61.5%
- 18
ERNIE-4.5-VL-28B-A3B-Thinking 60.4%
- 19
Seed1.5-VL 60.3%
- 20
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 59.7%
- 21
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 57.3%
- 22
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 55.2%
- 23 LFM2.5-VL-3B 47.2%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 73.5% | May 2026 | Model card | |
| 2 | | 73.1% | Nov 2025 | Model card | |
| 3 | | 71.4% | Feb 2026 | Model card | |
| 4 | | 69.8% | Apr 2026 | Model card | |
| 5 | | 68% | Feb 2026 | Model card | |
| 6 | | 67.6% | Feb 2026 | Model card | |
| 7 | | 66.7% | Sep 2025 | Model card | |
| 8 | GLM-4.5V | 65.4% | Aug 2025 | Model card | |
| 9 | | 64.9% | Jan 2026 | Model card | |
| 10 | | 64.4% | Mar 2026 | Model card | |
| 11 | | 64.2% | Jul 2025 | Model card | |
| 12 | | 63.9% | Dec 2025 | Model card | |
| 13 | | 63.9% | Feb 2026 | Model card | |
| 14 | | 63.7% | Apr 2026 | Model card | |
| 15 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking | 63.2% | Jul 2025 | Model card | |
| 16 | GLM-4.6V | 62.3% | Jan 2026 | Model card | |
| 17 | | 61.5% | Aug 2026 | Model card | |
| 18 | | 60.4% | Nov 2025 | Model card | |
| 19 | | 60.3% | May 2025 | Model card | |
| 20 | | 59.7% | Sep 2025 | Model card | |
| 21 | | 57.3% | Aug 2025 | Model card | |
| 22 | | 55.2% | Feb 2025 | Model card | |
| 23 | LFM2.5-VL-3B | 47.2% | Aug 2026 | Model card |
8 models have held number one since its release in Oct 2023
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
2 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026 | LFM2.5-VL-3B | 47.2 | HallusionBench |
| 12 Aug 2026 | 61.5 | HallusionBench | |
| 25 May 2026 | 73.5 | HallusionBench | |
| 15 Apr 2026 | 69.8 | HallusionBench | |
| 9 Apr 2026 | 63.7 | HallusionBench | |
| 4 Mar 2026 | 64.4 | HallusionBench (default mode) | |
| 24 Feb 2026 | 67.6 | HallusionBench | |
| 16 Feb 2026 | 71.4 | HallusionBench | |
| 6 Feb 2026 | 63.9 | HallusionBench | |
| 18 Dec 2025 | 63.9 | HallusionBench | |
| 11 Nov 2025 | 60.4 | HallusionBench | |
| 23 Sep 2025 | 66.7 | HallusionBench | |
| 22 Sep 2025 | 59.7 | HallusionBench | |
| 25 Aug 2025 | 57.3 | HallusionBench | |
| 11 Aug 2025 | GLM-4.5V | 65.4 | HallusionBench |
| 31 Jul 2025 | 64.2 | Hallusion Bench | |
| 12 May 2025 | 60.3 | HallusionBench | |
| 28 Jan 2025 | 55.2 | Hallusion Bench |
16 system cards report it, from 10 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 Jun 2026 | | 73.5 | HallusionBench (Figure 5, printed value) | Hallucination |
| 9 Apr 2026 | | 63.7 | HallusionBench (Table 2, Reasoning mode) | Hallucination |
| 21 Mar 2026 | | 63.9 | HallusionBench (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 4 Mar 2026 | | 64.4 | HallusionBench, default mode, 63.1 force nothink, 63.9 force thinking (Tables 5 and 6) | Hallucination |
| 14 Feb 2026 | | 68 | HallusionBench (Table 8) | Capabilities |
| 4 Feb 2026 | | 63.9 | HallusionBench (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| 14 Jan 2026 | | 64.9 | HallusionBench, SeRe (Tables 1 and 3). PaCoRe 64.54 | Hallucination |
| 1 Jan 2026 | GLM-4.6V technical report | 62.3 | HallusionBench, GLM-4.6V thinking (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 26 Nov 2025 | | 66.7 | HallusionBench (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 6 Nov 2025 | | 73.1 | HallusionBench, reasoning on (Table 3). Reasoning off 72.3 | Capabilities |
| 22 Sep 2025 | | 59.7 | HallusionBench, Instruct (Table 9). Thinking 62.8 (Table 10) | Capabilities |
| 25 Aug 2025 | | 57.3 | HallusionBench (avg) (Table 2, Table 6) | Hallucination |
| 13 Aug 2025 | GLM-4.5V technical report | 65.4 | HallusionBench, GLM-4.5V thinking (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 1 Jul 2025 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking technical report | 63.2 | HallusionBench, GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking thinking (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 11 May 2025 | | 60.3 | HallusionBench, thinking (Table 6). Non-thinking 60.0 | Capabilities |
| 19 Feb 2025 | | 55.2 | HallBench avg (Table 3) | Capabilities |
More in Factuality
- SimpleVQA In use Models answer 2,025 short factual questions about images across 9 tasks and 9 topics. An LLM judge grades answers against fixed references.
Qwen3.7-Plus 81.7%
- SimpleQA Verified In use 1,000 human-verified, de-duplicated short-answer factual questions measuring parametric knowledge.
Gemini 3.1 Pro 77.5%
- GaRAGe In use Models write long-form RAG answers to 2,366 questions with human-annotated grounding passages. Scoring checks whether answers use the relevant passages.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 40.7%
- Kimi Hallu Bench In use Models answer hard prompts drawn from practical work tasks. Fact-checking agents score the share of claims that are hallucinated. Kimi K3.1 Pro 8.30%
- RAGTruth In use A word-level annotated corpus of hallucinations in retrieval-augmented generation answers. It is used to train and evaluate hallucination detection and RAG faithfulness.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 77.9%
- TruthfulQA Fading Models answer 817 questions across 38 categories that are written to elicit common misconceptions. Scoring checks for truthful answers, often in multiple-choice form.
MAI-Thinking-1 88%