SimpleQA Verified
1,000 human-verified, de-duplicated short-answer factual questions measuring parametric knowledge.
Google fixed one dataset error on 2026-03-09 and posted paper v2 on 2026-03-10. Scores stay comparable, so it remains one record.
In the authors’ words
We introduce SimpleQA Verified, a 1,000-prompt benchmark for evaluating Large Language Model (LLM) short-form factuality based on OpenAI's SimpleQA. It addresses critical limitations in OpenAI's benchmark, including noisy and incorrect labels, topical biases, and question redundancy. SimpleQA Verified was created through a rigorous multi-stage filtering process involving de-duplication, topic balancing, and source reconciliation to produce a more reliable and challenging evaluation set, alongside improvements in the autorater prompt. On this new benchmark, Gemini 2.5 Pro achieves a state-of-the-art F1-score of 55.6, outperforming other frontier models, including GPT-5. This work provides the research community with a higher-fidelity tool to track genuine progress in parametric model factuality and to mitigate hallucinations. The benchmark dataset, evaluation code, and leaderboard are available at: https://www.kaggle.com/benchmarks/deepmind/simpleqa-verified.
- Level
- University Undergraduates and entry-level professionals
- Scored
- Graded by a model A language model scores each response, usually against a rubric.
- Answers
- Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
Gemini 3.1 Pro leads with 77.5%
Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.
- 77.5
Gemini 3.1 Pro
- 75.8 GPT-6 Astra
- 75.6
Gemini 4 Argon
- 74.6
Gemini 3.8 Flash
- 73.8 GPT-6.1 Sol
- 73.2
Gemini 3.7 Flash
- 72.1
Gemini 3 Pro
- 70.4
Gemini 3.5 Flash
- 69.2 GPT-5.6 Sol
- 64.4 GPT-6 Sol
- 63.3 Claude Opus 5
- 59.4 Grok 4.7
- 53.8 Grok 4.5
- 53.7
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking
- 52.9 Grok 4.6
- 52.3 o3
- 51.9 Grok 4
- 45.2 Claude Opus 4.6
- 44.8 Claude Sonnet 5.5
- 44.5 Claude Opus 4.8
- 42.3
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- 41.5 GPT-5.6 Terra
- 39.3 Grok 3
- 39.1 GPT-5.6 Luna
- 39.0 Claude Opus 4.5
- 34.9 GPT-5.1
- 33.1
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
- 32.1 Claude Sonnet 5
- 31.0 Claude Opus 4.1
- 30.9 Claude Sonnet 4.6
- 30.4 GPT-5.4
- 29.2 Claude Sonnet 4.5
- 28.6
DeepSeek-R1
- 28.1
Gemini 2.5 Flash
- 27.4
DeepSeek-V3
- 24.3
DeepSeek-V3.1
- 23.9 Claude Haiku 5.5
- 22.3
Mistral Large 2
- 21.2 o4-mini
- 20.5 Grok-2
- 20.2 Grok-3 mini
- 19.7 Grok 4 Fast
- 17.8
Mixtral 8x22B
- 13.1 gpt-oss-120b
- 11.2 GPT-3.5 Turbo
- 10.7
Gemma 3 27B
- 10.7
Gemma 4 31B IT
- 9.06 GPT-4o mini
- 9.05
Gemma 4 26B A4B
- 8.57 Granite 4.0 H Small
- 6.82
Ministral 8B
- 6.70
Gemma 3 12B
- 5.95 gpt-oss-20b
- 5.56
Codestral
- 5.43
Ministral 3B
- 4.60
Gemma 3 4B
- 1
Gemini 3.1 Pro 77.5%
- 2 GPT-6 Astra 75.8%
- 3
Gemini 4 Argon 75.6%
- 4
Gemini 3.8 Flash 74.6%
- 5 GPT-6.1 Sol 73.8%
- 6
Gemini 3.7 Flash 73.2%
- 7
Gemini 3 Pro 72.1%
- 8
Gemini 3.5 Flash 70.4%
- 9 GPT-5.6 Sol 69.2%
- 10 GPT-6 Sol 64.4%
- 11 Claude Opus 5 63.3%
- 12 Grok 4.7 59.4%
- 13 Grok 4.5 53.8%
- 14
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking Jul 2025 53.7%
- 15 Grok 4.6 52.9%
- 16 o3 52.3%
- 17 Grok 4 51.9%
- 18 Claude Opus 4.6 45.2%
- 19 Claude Sonnet 5.5 44.8%
- 20 Claude Opus 4.8 44.5%
- 21
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 42.3%
- 22 GPT-5.6 Terra 41.5%
- 23 Grok 3 39.3%
- 24 GPT-5.6 Luna 39.1%
- 25 Claude Opus 4.5 39%
- 26 GPT-5.1 34.9%
- 27
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 33.1%
- 28 Claude Sonnet 5 32.1%
- 29 Claude Opus 4.1 31%
- 30 Claude Sonnet 4.6 30.9%
- 31 GPT-5.4 30.4%
- 32 Claude Sonnet 4.5 thinking 29.2%
- 33
DeepSeek-R1 May 2025 28.6%
- 34
Gemini 2.5 Flash Jun 2025 28.1%
- 35
DeepSeek-V3 Mar 2025 27.4%
- 36
DeepSeek-V3.1 24.3%
- 37 Claude Haiku 5.5 23.9%
- 38
Mistral Large 2 Nov 2024 22.3%
- 39 o4-mini 21.2%
- 40 Grok-2 Dec 2024 20.5%
- 41 Grok-3 mini 20.2%
- 42 Grok 4 Fast reasoning 19.7%
- 43
Mixtral 8x22B 17.8%
- 44 gpt-oss-120b 13.1%
- 45 GPT-3.5 Turbo Nov 2023 11.2%
- 46
Gemma 3 27B 10.7%
- 47
Gemma 4 31B IT 10.7%
- 48 GPT-4o mini 9.06%
- 49
Gemma 4 26B A4B 9.05%
- 50 Granite 4.0 H Small 8.57%
- 51
Ministral 8B 6.82%
- 52
Gemma 3 12B 6.70%
- 53 gpt-oss-20b 5.95%
- 54
Codestral 5.56%
- 55
Ministral 3B 5.43%
- 56
Gemma 3 4B 4.60%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 77.5% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | GPT-6 Astra | 75.8% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | | 75.6% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 74.6% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | GPT-6.1 Sol | 73.8% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | | 73.2% | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 72.1% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | | 70.4% | May 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 69.2% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | GPT-6 Sol | 64.4% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | Claude Opus 5 | 63.3% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | Grok 4.7 | 59.4% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | Grok 4.5 | 53.8% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | | 53.7% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | Grok 4.6 | 52.9% | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | o3 | 52.3% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | Grok 4 | 51.9% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | Claude Opus 4.6 | 45.2% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 44.8% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 44.5% | May 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | | 42.3% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | GPT-5.6 Terra | 41.5% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | Grok 3 | 39.3% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 24 | GPT-5.6 Luna | 39.1% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 25 | Claude Opus 4.5 | 39% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 26 | GPT-5.1 | 34.9% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 27 | | 33.1% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 28 | Claude Sonnet 5 | 32.1% | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 29 | Claude Opus 4.1 | 31% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 30 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 30.9% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 31 | GPT-5.4 | 30.4% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 32 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | 29.2% | thinking | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 33 | | 28.6% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 34 | | 28.1% | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 35 | | 27.4% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 36 | | 24.3% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 37 | Claude Haiku 5.5 | 23.9% | Oct 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 38 | | 22.3% | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 39 | o4-mini | 21.2% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 40 | Grok-2 Dec 2024 | 20.5% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 41 | Grok-3 mini | 20.2% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 42 | Grok 4 Fast | 19.7% | reasoning | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 43 | | 17.8% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 44 | gpt-oss-120b | 13.1% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 45 | GPT-3.5 Turbo Nov 2023 | 11.2% | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 46 | | 10.7% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 47 | | 10.7% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 48 | GPT-4o mini | 9.06% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 49 | | 9.05% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 50 | Granite 4.0 H Small | 8.57% | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 51 | | 6.82% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 52 | | 6.70% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 53 | gpt-oss-20b | 5.95% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 54 | | 5.56% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 55 | | 5.43% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 56 | | 4.60% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
Epoch AI has scores for 84 models. Labs report scores for 22 models in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.
3 models have held number one since its release in Sep 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard, Epoch AI’s runs and what labs claim in their cards.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
3 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 Sep 2026 | 42.3 | SimpleQA-Verified (EM) | |
| 30 Jul 2026 | 20.6 | SimpleQA Verified | |
| 15 Jul 2026 | 43.9 | SimpleQA Verified | |
| 2 Jun 2026 | 31 | SimpleQA Verified | |
| 24 Apr 2026 | 57.9 | SimpleQA-Verified (Pass@1) | |
| 3 Mar 2026 | 43.3 | SimpleQA Verified | |
| 14 Feb 2026 | 36 | SimpleQA Verified | |
| 17 Dec 2025 | 68.7 | SimpleQA Verified | |
| 19 Nov 2025 | 30.9 | SimpleQA Verified (f1) | |
| 18 Nov 2025 | 72.1 | SimpleQA Verified | |
| 25 Sep 2025 | 9.6 | SimpleQA Verified, Thinking | |
| 25 Sep 2025 | 27.8 | SimpleQA Verified, model card |
18 system cards report it, from 9 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 Oct 2026 | | 78.8 | SimpleQA Verified F1 score 78.8; incorrect rate 6.3% (Figures 5.11, 5.12) | Hallucination |
| 10 Sep 2026 | | SimpleQA-Verified (Pass@1) vs reasoning effort, chart only (Figure 12) | Hallucination | |
| 30 Jul 2026 | | 20.6 | SimpleQA Verified (5. Evaluations table) | Hallucination |
| 15 Jul 2026 | | 43.9 | SimpleQA Verified (5. Evaluations table, effort 0.99) | Hallucination |
| 13 Jun 2026 | | 31.5 | SimpleQA-Verified, correct (Table 5) | Capabilities |
| 12 Jun 2026 | | 70.8 | SimpleQA Verified F1 (Table 2 labels it Hallucination, Table 21). Correct 67.6, correct given attempted 74.3 | Hallucination |
| 2 Jun 2026 | | 31 | SimpleQA Verified, accuracy (Table 12, rounded) | Hallucination |
| 28 May 2026 | Claude Opus 4.8 system card | 27 | SimpleQA Verified net score 0.27 (correct minus incorrect), closed book, printed on chart (6.3.3.1, Figure 6.3.3.1.B) | Hallucination |
| 26 Apr 2026 | | 57.9 | SimpleQA-Verified (Pass@1), DS-V4-Pro Max (Table 6) | Hallucination |
| 26 Apr 2026 | | 34.1 | SimpleQA-Verified (Pass@1), DeepSeek-V4-Flash Max (Table 7) | Hallucination |
| 16 Apr 2026 | Claude Opus 4.7 system card | 28.6 | Simple-QA-Verified net score (correct minus incorrect), closed book, printed on chart. Correct 44.9, unsure 38.7, incorrect 16.3 (6.3.3.1, Figures 6.3.3.1.A and B) | Hallucination |
| 7 Apr 2026 | Claude Mythos Preview system card | 70.7 | Simple-QA-Verified correct rate, no tools, value printed on chart; unsure 10.3, incorrect 19.0, net score not printed (4.3.3.1, Figure 4.3.3.1.B) | Hallucination |
| 3 Mar 2026 | | 43.3 | SimpleQA Verified (results table, p.4) | Capabilities |
| 14 Feb 2026 | | 36 | SimpleQA Verified (Table 3) | Hallucination |
| 5 Feb 2026 | Claude Opus 4.6 system card | 16.2 | Simple-QA-Verified net score (correct minus incorrect), extended thinking, value printed on chart; correct rate 37.7, net 7.8 with thinking plus effort, net 3.6 without thinking (Figure 4.2.B) | Hallucination |
| 30 Jan 2026 | Kimi K2.5 technical report | 36.9 | SimpleQA Verified (Table 4) | Hallucination |
| 24 Nov 2025 | Claude Opus 4.5 system card | 44.1 | Simple-QA-Verified correct rate, extended thinking (Figure 4.1.B; incorrect 35.4%, uncertain 20.5%) | Hallucination |
| 26 Sep 2025 | | 27.8 | Factuality SimpleQA Verified (Table, p.4) | Capabilities |
Versions
We switch the top row to each new version when it comes out. Open it for one row per version. An old version stays in play while people still test it, so whoever first takes it past 85% gets credit for closing it out.
More in Factuality
- SimpleVQA In use Models answer 2,025 short factual questions about images across 9 tasks and 9 topics. An LLM judge grades answers against fixed references.
Qwen3.7-Plus 81.7%
- HallusionBench In use Models answer 1,129 yes or no questions about 346 images, built in pairs to expose language hallucination and visual illusion. Scored by accuracy.
Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B 73.5%
- GaRAGe In use Models write long-form RAG answers to 2,366 questions with human-annotated grounding passages. Scoring checks whether answers use the relevant passages.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 40.7%
- Kimi Hallu Bench In use Models answer hard prompts drawn from practical work tasks. Fact-checking agents score the share of claims that are hallucinated. Kimi K3.1 Pro 8.30%
- RAGTruth In use A word-level annotated corpus of hallucinations in retrieval-augmented generation answers. It is used to train and evaluate hallucination detection and RAG faithfulness.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 77.9%
- TruthfulQA Fading Models answer 817 questions across 38 categories that are written to elicit common misconceptions. Scoring checks for truthful answers, often in multiple-choice form.
MAI-Thinking-1 88%