Benchmark Almanac

Factorio Learning Environment

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 293206.0 leads since Mar 2025 Not in model cards

Agents write Python programs that control a Factorio factory, in lab tasks with fixed resources and in open play. Scored by production throughput, milestones and lab task success.

Versioned releases from 0.2 (May 2025) to 0.4 (March 2026, moved to Factorio 2.0 and added Inspect support). Scores may shift across versions. The board lists 6 models.

In the authors’ words

Large Language Models (LLMs) are rapidly saturating existing benchmarks, necessitating new open-ended evaluations. We introduce the Factorio Learning Environment (FLE), based on the game of Factorio, that tests agents in long-term planning, program synthesis, and resource optimization. FLE provides exponentially scaling challenges – from basic automation to complex factories processing millions of resource units per second. We provide two settings: (1) lab-play consisting of eight structured tasks with fixed resources, and (2) open-play with the unbounded task of building the largest factory on an procedurally generated map. We demonstrate across both settings that models still lack strong spatial reasoning. In lab-play, we find that LLMs exhibit promising short-horizon skills, yet are unable to operate effectively in constrained environments, reflecting limitations in error analysis. In open-play, while LLMs discover automation strategies that improve growth (e.g electric-powered drilling), they fail to achieve complex automation (e.g electronic-circuit manufacturing).

Abstract of Factorio Learning Environment (arXiv:2503.09617, CC0)
Made by Jack Hopkins et al. (FLE team) Released Mar 2025 Video games All tasks public Last model added Feb 2025 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
6
Models scored on its own leaderboard

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) leads with 293206.0 among models released by Feb 2025

Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.

The newest model with a score here came out in Feb 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 293206.0
  2. 2 Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 115782.0
  3. 3 GPT-4o Aug 2024 87599.0
  4. 4 Llama 3.3 70B 54998.0
  5. 5 DeepSeek-V3 48585.0
  6. 6 GPT-4o mini 26756.0
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 293206.0 Oct 2024 Official leaderboard
2 Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 115782.0 Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
3 GPT-4o Aug 2024 87599.0 Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
4 Llama 3.3 70B 54998.0 Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
5 DeepSeek-V3 48585.0 Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
6 GPT-4o mini 26756.0 Jul 2024 Official leaderboard

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Anthropic
Own leaderboard Not tested since Mar 2025

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard
0.00 100000.0 200000.0 300000.0 2025 0.00 100000.0 200000.0 300000.0 2025

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Games and long tasks

All 68 in Games and long tasks
  • ARC-AGI-3 In use Interactive game environments where agents must explore, infer goals and rules, and act efficiently without instructions. GPT-6 Astra 100%
  • MineDojo Fading Agents complete open-ended tasks in Minecraft, such as mining blocks and fighting mobs, from a large simulation suite. Programmatic checks score many tasks. Seed2.0 Pro 49%
  • Orak Fading LLM agents play 12 popular video games across most genres through an MCP interface. Scores come from in-game progress or outcomes per title. Nemotron 3 Nano 4B 22.9
  • GameWorld Only in system cards Multimodal game agents play 34 browser games across 170 tasks. Outcomes are checked from the game state. Gemini 3 Flash 41.9%
  • Swarm Bench Only in system cards Models orchestrate agent swarms on complex tasks that benefit from coordinated decomposition and parallel execution. Kimi K3 76.3%
  • TextQuests Only in system cards Agents play 25 classic interactive fiction games. Measures game progress and harmful actions per 100 steps. Muse Spark 2.40