Benchmark Almanac

EgoSchema

Qwen2.5-VL-72B 76.2% leads since Jan 2025 Dropped

Models answer five-way multiple-choice questions about three-minute egocentric video clips from Ego4D. Scored by accuracy on 5,031 questions.

Answers are public for only 500 questions. The full test set is scored by a server.

In the authors’ words

We introduce EgoSchema, a very long-form video question-answering dataset, and benchmark to evaluate long video understanding capabilities of modern vision and language systems. Derived from Ego4D, EgoSchema consists of over 5000 human curated multiple choice question answer pairs, spanning over 250 hours of real video data, covering a very broad range of natural human activity and behavior. For each question, EgoSchema requires the correct answer to be selected between five given options based on a three-minute-long video clip. While some prior works have proposed video datasets with long clip lengths, we posit that merely the length of the video clip does not truly capture the temporal difficulty of the video task that is being considered. To remedy this, we introduce temporal certificate sets, a general notion for capturing the intrinsic temporal understanding length associated with a broad range of video understanding tasks & datasets. Based on this metric, we find EgoSchema to have intrinsic temporal lengths over 5.7x longer than the second closest dataset and 10x to 100x longer than any other video understanding dataset. Further, our evaluation of several current state-of-the-art video and language models shows them to be severely lacking in long-term video understanding capabilities. Even models with several billions of parameters achieve QA accuracy less than 33% (random is 20%) on the EgoSchema multi-choice question answering task, while humans achieve about 76% accuracy. We posit that \name, with its long intrinsic temporal structures and diverse complexity, would serve as a valuable evaluation probe for developing effective long-term video understanding systems in the future. Data and Zero-shot model evaluation code are open-sourced for both public and commercial use under the Ego4D license at http://egoschema.github.io

Abstract of EgoSchema: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Very Long-form Video Language Understanding (arXiv:2308.09126, CC0)
Made by UC Berkeley Released Aug 2023 Long videos Public tasks plus a private test set Last in a launch post Apr 2025 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Apr 2025
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Multiple choice
12
Models scored in lab cards
12
Launch posts list it, from 5 labs
5
System cards report it, from 3 labs

Qwen2.5-VL-72B leads with 76.2% among models released by Apr 2025

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Apr 2025, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 76.2%
  2. 2 Grok 3 74.5%
  3. 3 Grok-3 mini 74.3%
  4. 4 Amazon Nova Premier 73.8%
  5. 5 GPT-4o May 2024 72.2%
  6. 6 Gemini 1.5 Pro May 2024 72.2%
  7. 7 Gemini 2.0 Pro 71.9%
  8. 8 Gemini 2.0 Flash Dec 2024 71.5%
  9. 9 Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 71.1%
  10. 10 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 68.6%
  11. 11 Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite 67.2%
  12. 12 Gemini 1.5 Pro Feb 2024 63.2%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 76.2% Jan 2025 Model card
2 Grok 3 74.5% Feb 2025 Model card
3 Grok-3 mini 74.3% Feb 2025 Model card
4 Amazon Nova Premier 73.8% Apr 2025 Model card
5 GPT-4o May 2024 72.2% May 2024 Model card
6 Gemini 1.5 Pro May 2024 72.2% May 2024 Model card
7 Gemini 2.0 Pro 71.9% Feb 2025 Model card
8 Gemini 2.0 Flash Dec 2024 71.5% Dec 2024 Model card
9 Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 71.1% Feb 2025 Model card
10 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 68.6% Mar 2025 Model card
11 Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite 67.2% Feb 2025 Model card
12 Gemini 1.5 Pro Feb 2024 63.2% Feb 2024 Model card

3 models have held number one since its release in Aug 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Google DeepMind OpenAI Qwen
Lab claims Not tested since Apr 2025

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen2.5-VL-72B GPT-4o Gemini 1.5 Pro 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen2.5-VL-72B Gemini 1.5 Pro

No launch post has listed it since Apr 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Google DeepMind
OpenAI
Qwen
xAI
Amazon
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
30 Apr 2025 Amazon Nova Premier 73.8 EgoSchema
27 Mar 2025 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 68.6 EgoSchematest
19 Feb 2025 Grok-3 mini 74.3 EgoSchema [Grok 3 mini, non-reasoning table]
19 Feb 2025 Grok 3 74.5 EgoSchema [Grok 3 Beta]
5 Feb 2025 Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite 67.2 EgoSchema (test)
5 Feb 2025 Gemini 2.0 Flash 71.1 EgoSchema (test)
5 Feb 2025 Gemini 2.0 Pro 71.9 EgoSchema (test)
28 Jan 2025 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 76.2 EgoSchema
11 Dec 2024 Gemini 2.0 Flash 71.5 EgoSchema (test)
14 May 2024 Gemini 1.5 Pro 72.2 EgoSchema (test), 0-shot
13 May 2024 GPT-4o 72.2 EgoSchema (%) (test)
15 Feb 2024 Gemini 1.5 Pro 63.2 EgoSchema (test), 0-shot

5 system cards report it, from 3 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
30 Apr 2025 Amazon Nova Premier technical report 73.8 EgoSchema, +/-3.9 (Table 1) Capabilities
15 Apr 2025 Gemini 2.0 Flash model card 71.1 EgoSchema (test) (Table, p.3, column Gemini 2.0 Flash (GA)) Capabilities
10 Apr 2025 Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite model card 67.2 EgoSchema (test) (Table, p.3) Capabilities
26 Mar 2025 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B technical report 68.6 EgoSchema test (Table 7) Capabilities
19 Feb 2025 Qwen2.5-VL-72B technical report 76.2 EgoSchema test (Table 8) Capabilities

More in Audio and video

All 168 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%
  • TVBench In use Models answer multiple-choice questions on 10 temporal video tasks, such as action counting and ordering, that static frames cannot solve. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 81.9%