CFLUE Application
Models complete Chinese financial language tasks. The score is the published average of the application task metrics.
One track of CFLUE. The CFLUE record keeps lab scores that combine tracks.
- Made by
- Alibaba Cloud (Qwen DianJin) and Soochow University
- Released
- May 2024
- Kind
- Finance
- Level
- University
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
-
Llama 2-70B #209 on the capability index
- Last model added
- October 2023
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
In light of recent breakthroughs in large language models (LLMs) that have revolutionized natural language processing (NLP), there is an urgent need for new benchmarks to keep pace with the fast development of LLMs. In this paper, we propose CFLUE, the Chinese Financial Language Understanding Evaluation benchmark, designed to assess the capability of LLMs across various dimensions. Specifically, CFLUE provides datasets tailored for both knowledge assessment and application assessment. In knowledge assessment, it consists of 38K+ multiple-choice questions with associated solution explanations. These questions serve dual purposes: answer prediction and question reasoning. In application assessment, CFLUE features 16K+ test instances across distinct groups of NLP tasks such as text classification, machine translation, relation extraction, reading comprehension, and text generation. Upon CFLUE, we conduct a thorough evaluation of representative LLMs. The results reveal that only GPT-4 and GPT-4-turbo achieve an accuracy exceeding 60% in answer prediction for knowledge assessment, suggesting that there is still substantial room for improvement in current LLMs. In application assessment, although GPT-4 and GPT-4-turbo are the top two performers, their considerable advantage over lightweight LLMs is noticeably diminished. The datasets and scripts associated with CFLUE are openly accessible at https://github.com/aliyun/cflue.
GPT-4 (snapshot unspecified) tops the leaderboard with 49.6
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Qwen-14B, at 44.2.
The newest model with a score here came out in October 2023, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 49.6 GPT-4 (snapshot unspecified)
- 49.1 GPT-4-turbo (snapshot unspecified)
- 48.3 Qwen-72B
- 48.1 ChatGPT
- 44.2
Qwen-14B
- 42.1 Tongyi-Finance-14B
- 40.8 Qwen-7B-Chat
- 39.6 Baichuan2-13B-Chat
- 36.8 DISC-FinLLM-13B
- 36.6 ChatGLM3-6B
- 35.8 Qwen-1.8B-Chat
- 35.5 vicuna-13B-v1.5-16k
- 32.5 Baichuan2-7B-Chat
- 32.1 FinGPT V3-6B
- 18.6
Llama 2-70B
- 12.3 Llama-2-7b-chat
- 1 GPT-4 (snapshot unspecified) 49.6
- 2 GPT-4-turbo (snapshot unspecified) 49.1
- 3 Qwen-72B 48.3
- 4 ChatGPT 48.1
- 5
Qwen-14B 44.2
- 6 Tongyi-Finance-14B 42.1
- 7 Qwen-7B-Chat 40.8
- 8 Baichuan2-13B-Chat 39.6
- 9 DISC-FinLLM-13B 36.8
- 10 ChatGLM3-6B 36.6
- 11 Qwen-1.8B-Chat 35.8
- 12 vicuna-13B-v1.5-16k 35.5
- 13 Baichuan2-7B-Chat 32.5
- 14 FinGPT V3-6B 32.1
- 15
Llama 2-70B 18.6
- 16 Llama-2-7b-chat 12.3
Source: Official CFLUE Application leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-4 (snapshot unspecified) | 49.6 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 2 | GPT-4-turbo (snapshot unspecified) | 49.1 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 3 | Qwen-72B | 48.3 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 4 | ChatGPT | 48.1 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 5 | | 44.2 | Sep 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | Tongyi-Finance-14B | 42.1 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 7 | Qwen-7B-Chat | 40.8 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 8 | Baichuan2-13B-Chat | 39.6 | Sep 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | DISC-FinLLM-13B | 36.8 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 10 | ChatGLM3-6B | 36.6 | Oct 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | Qwen-1.8B-Chat | 35.8 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 12 | vicuna-13B-v1.5-16k | 35.5 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 13 | Baichuan2-7B-Chat | 32.5 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 14 | FinGPT V3-6B | 32.1 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 15 | | 18.6 | Jul 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | Llama-2-7b-chat | 12.3 | Official leaderboard |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official CFLUE Application leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official CFLUE Application leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Law, finance and medicine
- MedXpertQA-MM In use Models answer expert-level medical exam questions that combine images with clinical records and test results. Scoring is accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 80.4%
- HealthBench Professional In use 525 physician-authored tasks from real clinician chats (care consult, documentation, research) with physician-adjudicated rubrics. Claude Sonnet 5.5 69.2%
- HealthBench In use 5,000 realistic health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics. A length-adjusted variant penalizes verbosity. GPT-5 67.2%
- FinSearchComp In use Agents search the web to fetch live financial data, look up history, and run multi-step investigations, across 635 expert-written questions. Scored by answer accuracy.
Ling-3.1-flash 81.7%
- KBL In use Models answer Korean legal knowledge and reasoning tasks and Korean bar exam questions. It has 7 knowledge tasks, 4 reasoning tasks and 2,510 bar exam items.
Solar Pro 4 77.5%
- KorMedMCQA In use Models answer 7,469 multiple-choice questions from Korean licensing exams for doctors, nurses, pharmacists and dentists, held from 2012 to 2024.
Solar Pro 4 93.2%