CEO-Bench
Agents steer a simulated AI startup for 500 days, gathering noisy information and adapting plans. The outcome of the simulated company is the score.
AINews noted that endpoint choice changed Kimi K3 results a lot. 83 GitHub stars.
In the authors’ words
Language model agents are becoming proficient executors at isolated, short-horizon tasks such as software engineering and customer service. Yet real-world challenges require a combination of sophisticated skills that remain largely untested in agents: (1) navigating long horizons amid uncertainty; (2) acquiring information in noisy environments; (3) adapting to a changing world; (4) orchestrating multiple moving parts toward a coherent goal. We introduce CEO-Bench, which evaluates these capabilities together by simulating a representative real-world task: operating a startup for 500 days. An agent manages pricing, marketing, budgeting, and many other aspects of a fictional company through a programmable Python interface, operating in the same environment and facing the same challenges as a human CEO. Success demands analyzing noisy, interconnected business databases, translating signals into sound strategy, and coordinating many decisions with programming. The strongest agents write sophisticated code that forecasts churn regimes, billing timing, customer losses, and future cash under different scenarios. Even so, most state-of-the-art models struggle in this environment. Only Claude Fable 5, GPT-5.6 Sol, and Claude Opus 4.8 finish above the $1M starting balance, and all evaluated models remain below the rule-based baseline. CEO-Bench takes a first step toward measuring the intelligence required to drive sustained, adaptive progress over time.
- Level
- Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
- Scored
- Settled by events Predictions are scored against what later happens.
- Answers
- Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
Estimated final cash upper bound tops the leaderboard with $2,200,000,000
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Kimi K3, at $22,148,357.
The newest model with a score here came out in Aug 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 11 more
- $2,200,000,000 Estimated final cash upper bound
- $22,148,357 Kimi K3
- $15,756,408 Rule-based baseline
- $12,630,078 Claude Fable 5
- $11,313,982 GPT-5.6 Sol
- $2,399,209 Claude Opus 4.8
- $365,346
Qwen3.7-Max
- $246,419 Grok 4.6
- $75,126
Gemini 3.5 Flash
- $70,620 Claude Opus 4.7
- $64,459 Claude Sonnet 5
- $59,625 Claude Haiku 4.5
- $54,327 GLM-5.2
- $43,598 Kimi K2.6
- $38,166 Claude Sonnet 4.6
- $33,260 GPT-5.5
- $15,909 Grok 4.5
- $0
Gemini 3 Flash
- $0 Grok 4.20
- $0 GLM-5.1
- $0
DeepSeek-V4-Pro
- 1 Estimated final cash upper bound $2,200,000,000
- 2 Kimi K3 $22,148,357
- 3 Rule-based baseline $15,756,408
- 4 Claude Fable 5 $12,630,078
- 5 GPT-5.6 Sol $11,313,982
- 6 Claude Opus 4.8 $2,399,209
- 7
Qwen3.7-Max $365,346
- 8 Grok 4.6 $246,419
- 9
Gemini 3.5 Flash $75,126
- 10 Claude Opus 4.7 $70,620
- 11 Claude Sonnet 5 $64,459
- 12 Claude Haiku 4.5 $59,625
- 13 GLM-5.2 $54,327
- 14 Kimi K2.6 $43,598
- 15 Claude Sonnet 4.6 $38,166
- 16 GPT-5.5 $33,260
- 17 Grok 4.5 $15,909
- 18
Gemini 3 Flash $0
- 19 Grok 4.20 $0
- 20 GLM-5.1 $0
- 21
DeepSeek-V4-Pro $0
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Estimated final cash upper bound | $2,200,000,000 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 2 | Kimi K3 | $22,148,357 | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | Rule-based baseline | $15,756,408 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 4 | Claude Fable 5 | $12,630,078 | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | GPT-5.6 Sol | $11,313,982 | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | Claude Opus 4.8 | $2,399,209 | May 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | $365,346 | May 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | Grok 4.6 | $246,419 | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | | $75,126 | May 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | Claude Opus 4.7 | $70,620 | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | Claude Sonnet 5 | $64,459 | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | Claude Haiku 4.5 | $59,625 | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | GLM-5.2 | $54,327 | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | Kimi K2.6 | $43,598 | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | $38,166 | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | GPT-5.5 | $33,260 | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | Grok 4.5 | $15,909 | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | | $0 | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | Grok 4.20 | $0 | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | GLM-5.1 | $0 | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | | $0 | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
3 models have held number one since its release in Jun 2026
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Games and long tasks
- ARC-AGI-3 In use Interactive game environments where agents must explore, infer goals and rules, and act efficiently without instructions. GPT-6 Astra 100%
- MineDojo Fading Agents complete open-ended tasks in Minecraft, such as mining blocks and fighting mobs, from a large simulation suite. Programmatic checks score many tasks.
Seed2.0 Pro 49%
- Orak Fading LLM agents play 12 popular video games across most genres through an MCP interface. Scores come from in-game progress or outcomes per title.
Nemotron 3 Nano 4B 22.9
- GameWorld Only in system cards Multimodal game agents play 34 browser games across 170 tasks. Outcomes are checked from the game state.
Gemini 3 Flash 41.9%
- Swarm Bench Only in system cards Models orchestrate agent swarms on complex tasks that benefit from coordinated decomposition and parallel execution. Kimi K3 76.3%
- TextQuests Only in system cards Agents play 25 classic interactive fiction games. Measures game progress and harmful actions per 100 steps.
Muse Spark 2.40