Benchmark Almanac

XTREME

VECO 2.0 85.8 tops its leaderboard
Not in model cards

Multilingual models are fine-tuned on English data and then tested on 9 tasks in 40 languages. The tasks cover sentence classification, structured prediction such as named entities, question answering and sentence retrieval. The benchmark measures how well skills transfer across languages.

XTREME targets fine-tuned encoders such as mBERT and XLM-R, not prompted chat models. XTREME-R (2021) changes the task set and is a separate test. About 650 GitHub stars, and the repo was last pushed in 2023-01.

Released
March 2020
Kind
Reading in many languages
Level
School
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
All public

In the authors’ words

Much recent progress in applications of machine learning models to NLP has been driven by benchmarks that evaluate models across a wide variety of tasks. However, these broad-coverage benchmarks have been mostly limited to English, and despite an increasing interest in multilingual models, a benchmark that enables the comprehensive evaluation of such methods on a diverse range of languages and tasks is still missing. To this end, we introduce the Cross-lingual TRansfer Evaluation of Multilingual Encoders XTREME benchmark, a multi-task benchmark for evaluating the cross-lingual generalization capabilities of multilingual representations across 40 languages and 9 tasks. We demonstrate that while models tested on English reach human performance on many tasks, there is still a sizable gap in the performance of cross-lingually transferred models, particularly on syntactic and sentence retrieval tasks. There is also a wide spread of results across languages. We release the benchmark to encourage research on cross-lingual learning methods that transfer linguistic knowledge across a diverse and representative set of languages and tasks.

Abstract of XTREME: A Massively Multilingual Multi-task Benchmark for Evaluating Cross-lingual Generalization (arXiv:2003.11080, CC0)
27
Entries on its own leaderboard, 0 models we track

VECO 2.0 tops the leaderboard with 85.8

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

  1. 1 VECO 2.0 85.8
  2. 2 Turing ULR v6 85.5
  3. 3 ShenNonG 85.0
  4. 4 Turing ULR v5 84.5
  5. 5 CoFe 84.1
  6. 6 InfoXLM-XFT 82.2
  7. 7 Ensemble-Distil-XFT (ED-XFT) 82.0
  8. 8 VECO + HICTL 82.0
  9. 9 Polyglot 81.7
  10. 10 Unicoder + ZCode 81.6
  11. 11 ERNIE-M 80.9
  12. 12 HiCTL 80.8
  13. 13 T-ULRv2 + StableTune 80.7
  14. 14 Anonymous3 79.9
  15. 15 FILTER 77.0
  16. 16 Creative 76.5
  17. 17 X-STILTs 73.5
  18. 18 xlm-roberta-large-enhanced 68.7
  19. 19 XLM-R (large) 68.2
  20. 20 mT5-XXL (translate-train-all) 63.9
  21. 21 XLM-R (zero-shot) 63.9
  22. 22 mBERT 59.6
  23. 23 MMTE 59.3
  24. 24 XLM 55.8
  25. 25 mBERT (translate-train-all) 54.7
  26. 26 Anonymous5 53.1
  27. 27 Anonymous6 39.3

Source: Official XTREME leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 VECO 2.0 85.8 Official leaderboard
2 Turing ULR v6 85.5 Official leaderboard
3 ShenNonG 85.0 Official leaderboard
4 Turing ULR v5 84.5 Official leaderboard
5 CoFe 84.1 Official leaderboard
6 InfoXLM-XFT 82.2 Official leaderboard
7 Ensemble-Distil-XFT (ED-XFT) 82.0 Official leaderboard
8 VECO + HICTL 82.0 Official leaderboard
9 Polyglot 81.7 Official leaderboard
10 Unicoder + ZCode 81.6 Official leaderboard
11 ERNIE-M 80.9 Official leaderboard
12 HiCTL 80.8 Official leaderboard
13 T-ULRv2 + StableTune 80.7 Official leaderboard
14 Anonymous3 79.9 Official leaderboard
15 FILTER 77.0 Official leaderboard
16 Creative 76.5 Official leaderboard
17 X-STILTs 73.5 Official leaderboard
18 xlm-roberta-large-enhanced 68.7 Official leaderboard
19 XLM-R (large) 68.2 Official leaderboard
20 mT5-XXL (translate-train-all) 63.9 Official leaderboard
21 XLM-R (zero-shot) 63.9 Official leaderboard
22 mBERT 59.6 Official leaderboard
23 MMTE 59.3 Official leaderboard
24 XLM 55.8 Official leaderboard
25 mBERT (translate-train-all) 54.7 Official leaderboard
26 Anonymous5 53.1 Official leaderboard
27 Anonymous6 39.3 Official leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Multilingual

All 120 in Multilingual
  • MMMLU In use MMLU professionally translated into 14 languages. Multiple-choice accuracy. Claude Mythos Preview 92.7%
  • WMT24++ In use English-to-55-language translation of WMT24 test data. Scored with automatic metrics such as MetricX or xCOMET. K-EXAONE 90.5%
  • MMLU-ProX In use MMLU-Pro translated into up to 29 languages with expert review. Multiple-choice accuracy per language. Qwen3.7-Max 87%
  • CLIcK In use Models answer 1,995 multiple-choice questions on Korean language and culture. Questions come from official Korean exams and textbooks in eleven categories. Solar Open 2 90.7%
  • Global MMLU Lite 3.0 In use Models answer 400 human-translated MMLU questions per language in 23 languages. Version 3.0 adds Czech, Hungarian, Oriya, Slovak and Tajik and updates Italian. Accuracy. Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B Base 90.1%
  • MMMB In use Models answer multiple-choice questions about images in six languages across 15 categories. The set has about 12,000 questions. LFM2.5-VL-3B 83%