Benchmark Almanac

CLIcK

Solar Open 2 90.7% leads since Jul 2026 In use

Models answer 1,995 multiple-choice questions on Korean language and culture. Questions come from official Korean exams and textbooks in eleven categories.

Published at LREC-COLING 2024.

In the authors’ words

Despite the rapid development of large language models (LLMs) for the Korean language, there remains an obvious lack of benchmark datasets that test the requisite Korean cultural and linguistic knowledge. Because many existing Korean benchmark datasets are derived from the English counterparts through translation, they often overlook the different cultural contexts. For the few benchmark datasets that are sourced from Korean data capturing cultural knowledge, only narrow tasks such as bias and hate speech detection are offered. To address this gap, we introduce a benchmark of Cultural and Linguistic Intelligence in Korean (CLIcK), a dataset comprising 1,995 QA pairs. CLIcK sources its data from official Korean exams and textbooks, partitioning the questions into eleven categories under the two main categories of language and culture. For each instance in CLIcK, we provide fine-grained annotation of which cultural and linguistic knowledge is required to answer the question correctly. Using CLIcK, we test 13 language models to assess their performance. Our evaluation uncovers insights into their performances across the categories, as well as the diverse factors affecting their comprehension. CLIcK offers the first large-scale comprehensive Korean-centric analysis of LLMs' proficiency in Korean culture and language.

Abstract of CLIcK: A Benchmark Dataset of Cultural and Linguistic Intelligence in Korean (arXiv:2403.06412, CC0)
Made by KAIST and collaborators (Eunsu Kim et al.) Released Mar 2024 Knowledge in many languages All tasks public Last in a launch post Jul 2026 Last model added Aug 2026
Level
School Students, from grade school to high school
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Multiple choice
4
Models scored in lab cards
4
Launch posts list it, from 2 labs
4
System cards report it, from 2 labs

Solar Open 2 leads with 90.7% among models released by Jul 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Jul 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Solar Open 2 90.7%
  2. 2 K-EXAONE 2.0 84.2%
  3. 3 K-EXAONE 83.9%
  4. 4 Solar Open 100B 78.9%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Solar Open 2 90.7% Jul 2026 Model card
2 K-EXAONE 2.0 84.2% Jul 2026 Model card
3 K-EXAONE 83.9% Dec 2025 Model card
4 Solar Open 100B 78.9% Dec 2025 Model card

2 models have held number one since its release in Mar 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

LG AI Research Upstage
Lab claims Passed 85% in Jul 2026, by Solar Open 2
Solar Open 2 90.7%

The best score passed 85% in Jul 2026

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Solar Open 2 K-EXAONE 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Solar Open 2 K-EXAONE

2 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

LG AI Research
Upstage
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
31 Jul 2026 K-EXAONE 2.0 84.2 Click
22 Jul 2026 Solar Open 2 90.7 CLIcK
31 Dec 2025 Solar Open 100B 78.9 CLIcK
31 Dec 2025 K-EXAONE 83.9 CLIcK

4 system cards report it, from 2 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
5 Aug 2026 K-EXAONE 2.0 technical report 84.2 CLIcK (Table 6, Reasoning mode) Capabilities
22 Jul 2026 Solar Open 2 technical report 90.7 CLIcK (Table 4) Capabilities
11 Jan 2026 Solar Open 100B technical report 78.9 CLIcK (Table 5) Capabilities
5 Jan 2026 K-EXAONE technical report 83.9 CLIcK (Table 3, Reasoning mode). Non-reasoning 78.8 (Table 4) Capabilities

More in Multilingual

All 115 in Multilingual
  • MMMLU In use MMLU professionally translated into 14 languages. Multiple-choice accuracy. Claude Mythos Preview 92.7%
  • WMT24++ In use English-to-55-language translation of WMT24 test data. Scored with automatic metrics such as MetricX or xCOMET. K-EXAONE 90.5%
  • MMLU-ProX In use MMLU-Pro translated into up to 29 languages with expert review. Multiple-choice accuracy per language. Qwen3.7-Max 87%
  • Global MMLU Lite 3.0 In use Models answer 400 human-translated MMLU questions per language in 23 languages. Version 3.0 adds Czech, Hungarian, Oriya, Slovak and Tajik and updates Italian. Accuracy. Inkling 88.7%
  • MMMB In use Models answer multiple-choice questions about images in six languages across 15 categories. The set has about 12,000 questions. LFM2.5-VL-3B 83%
  • Alyah In use Models answer 1,173 four-option questions written by native Emirati speakers on greetings, idioms, figurative language, heritage and poetry in Emirati Arabic dialect. Falcon-Emirati-7B 84.8%