MMLU-ProX
MMLU-Pro translated into up to 29 languages with expert review. Multiple-choice accuracy per language.
The full set has 11,829 questions per language. It launched in March 2025 with fewer languages and reached 29 in May 2025, so early averages differ. MMLU-ProX Lite is a separate 658-question subset.
In the authors’ words
Existing large language model (LLM) evaluation benchmarks primarily focus on English, while current multilingual tasks lack parallel questions that specifically assess cross-linguistic reasoning abilities. This dual limitation makes it challenging to comprehensively assess LLMs' performance in the multilingual setting. To fill this gap, we introduce MMLU-ProX, a comprehensive benchmark covering 29 languages, built on an English benchmark. Each language version consists of 11,829 identical questions, enabling direct cross-linguistic comparisons. Additionally, to meet efficient evaluation needs, we provide a lite version containing 658 questions per language. To ensure the high quality of MMLU-ProX, we employ a rigorous development process that involves multiple powerful LLMs for translation, followed by expert review to ensure accurate expression, consistent terminology, and cultural relevance. Building on this, we systematically evaluate 36 state-of-the-art LLMs, including reasoning-enhanced and multilingual-optimized LLMs. The results reveal significant disparities in the multilingual capabilities of LLMs: While they perform well in high-resource languages, their performance declines markedly in low-resource languages, with gaps of up to 24.3%. Through MMLU-ProX, we aim to advance the development of more inclusive AI systems and promote equitable access to technology across global contexts.
- Level
- University Undergraduates and entry-level professionals
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Multiple choice
Qwen3.7-Max leads with 87%
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
- 87.0
Qwen3.7-Max
- 85.4
Qwen3.7-Plus
- 84.7
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
- 84.7
Qwen 3.6 Plus
- 83.0
Nemotron 3 Ultra
- 82.2
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- 81.0
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking
- 80.6
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B
- 80.1
Muse Glimmer
- 79.4
Nemotron 3 Super
- 78.7
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B
- 76.9
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
- 72.5
Nemotron-Cascade 2 30B-A3B
- 66.6 Granite 4.2 30B
- 66.2
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B
- 59.5
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B
- 19.9
Gemma 3n E4B
- 1
Qwen3.7-Max 87%
- 2
Qwen3.7-Plus 85.4%
- 3
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 84.7%
- 4
Qwen 3.6 Plus 84.7%
- 5
Nemotron 3 Ultra 83%
- 6
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 82.2%
- 7
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking Jul 2025 81%
- 8
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 80.6%
- 9
Muse Glimmer 80.1%
- 10
Nemotron 3 Super 79.4%
- 11
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B 78.7%
- 12
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 76.9%
- 13
Nemotron-Cascade 2 30B-A3B 72.5%
- 14 Granite 4.2 30B 66.6%
- 15
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 66.2%
- 16
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B 59.5%
- 17
Gemma 3n E4B 19.9%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 87% | May 2026 | Model card | |
| 2 | | 85.4% | Jun 2026 | Model card | |
| 3 | | 84.7% | Feb 2026 | Model card | |
| 4 | | 84.7% | Apr 2026 | Model card | |
| 5 | | 83% | Jun 2026 | Model card | |
| 6 | | 82.2% | Feb 2026 | Model card | |
| 7 | | 81% | Jul 2025 | Model card | |
| 8 | | 80.6% | Sep 2025 | Model card | |
| 9 | | 80.1% | Oct 2026 | Model card | |
| 10 | | 79.4% | Mar 2026 | Model card | |
| 11 | | 78.7% | Sep 2025 | Model card | |
| 12 | | 76.9% | Oct 2026 | Model card | |
| 13 | | 72.5% | Mar 2026 | Model card | |
| 14 | Granite 4.2 30B | 66.6% | Aug 2026 | Model card | |
| 15 | | 66.2% | Oct 2026 | Model card | |
| 16 | | 59.5% | Dec 2025 | Model card | |
| 17 | | 19.9% | Jun 2025 | Model card |
4 models have held number one since its release in Mar 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
The best score passed 85% in May 2026
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
3 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15 Oct 2026 | 76.9 | MMLU-ProX | |
| 25 Aug 2026 | Granite 4.2 30B | 66.6 | MMLU-ProX lite (IBM) |
| 4 Jun 2026 | 83 | MMLU-ProX (avg en/de/fr/es/it/ja/zh/hi/pt/ko) | |
| 1 Jun 2026 | 85.4 | MMLU-ProX (29 languages) | |
| 20 May 2026 | 87 | MMLU-ProX | |
| 2 Apr 2026 | 84.7 | MMLU-ProX | |
| 19 Mar 2026 | 72.5 | MMLU-ProX | |
| 11 Mar 2026 | 79.4 | MMLU-ProX (avg over langs) | |
| 24 Feb 2026 | 82.2 | MMLU-ProX (29 languages) | |
| 16 Feb 2026 | 84.7 | MMLU-ProX | |
| 15 Dec 2025 | 59.5 | MMLU-ProX (avg over langs) | |
| 23 Sep 2025 | 80.6 | MMLU-ProX | |
| 11 Sep 2025 | 78.7 | MMLU-ProX | |
| 25 Jul 2025 | 81 | MMLU-ProX | |
| 26 Jun 2025 | 19.9 | MMLU (ProX) 0-shot (IT) |
8 system cards report it, from 3 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 Oct 2026 | | 66.2 | MMLU-ProX average of 12 languages, BF16 reasoning, 64.01 non-reasoning (Table 7) | Capabilities |
| 19 Oct 2026 | | 80.1 | MMLU-ProX, mean pass@1, high (Tables 5 and 8) | Capabilities |
| 15 Oct 2026 | | 76.9 | MMLU-ProX, 10 languages (Table 10) | Capabilities |
| 9 Jun 2026 | | 83 | MMLU-ProX (avg en/de/fr/es/it/ja/zh/hi/pt/ko) (Table 10) | Capabilities |
| 19 Mar 2026 | | 72.5 | MMLU-ProX, 6 languages (Table 1 and A.7) | Capabilities |
| 11 Mar 2026 | | 79.4 | MMLU-ProX (avg over langs) (Table 5) | Capabilities |
| 23 Dec 2025 | | 59.5 | MMLU-ProX (avg over langs) (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| 26 Nov 2025 | | 80.6 | MMLU-ProX (Table 6) | Capabilities |
More in Multilingual
- MMMLU In use MMLU professionally translated into 14 languages. Multiple-choice accuracy. Claude Mythos Preview 92.7%
- WMT24++ In use English-to-55-language translation of WMT24 test data. Scored with automatic metrics such as MetricX or xCOMET.
K-EXAONE 90.5%
- CLIcK In use Models answer 1,995 multiple-choice questions on Korean language and culture. Questions come from official Korean exams and textbooks in eleven categories.
Solar Open 2 90.7%
- Global MMLU Lite 3.0 In use Models answer 400 human-translated MMLU questions per language in 23 languages. Version 3.0 adds Czech, Hungarian, Oriya, Slovak and Tajik and updates Italian. Accuracy.
Inkling 88.7%
- MMMB In use Models answer multiple-choice questions about images in six languages across 15 categories. The set has about 12,000 questions. LFM2.5-VL-3B 83%
- Alyah In use Models answer 1,173 four-option questions written by native Emirati speakers on greetings, idioms, figurative language, heritage and poetry in Emirati Arabic dialect.
Falcon-Emirati-7B 84.8%