WISE Verified
Models generate images from the revised WISE prompts. The verified evaluation changes about 200 prompts and the judge, so original scores remain separate.
Models generate images from the revised WISE prompts. The verified evaluation changes about 200 prompts and the judge, so original scores remain separate.
- Released
- April 2026
- Kind
- Image generation and editing
- Level
- School
- Scored
- Graded by a model
- Answers
- Open-ended
- Tasks
- All public
- Last model added
- January 2025
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Text-to-Image (T2I) models are capable of generating high-quality artistic creations and visual content. However, existing research and evaluation standards predominantly focus on image realism and shallow text-image alignment, lacking a comprehensive assessment of complex semantic understanding and world knowledge integration in text-to-image generation. To address this challenge, we propose WISE, the first benchmark specifically designed for World Knowledge-Informed Semantic Evaluation. WISE moves beyond simple word-pixel mapping by challenging models with 1000 meticulously crafted prompts across 25 subdomains in cultural common sense, spatio-temporal reasoning, and natural science. To overcome the limitations of traditional CLIP metric, we introduce WiScore, a novel quantitative metric for assessing knowledge-image alignment. Through comprehensive testing of 20 models (10 dedicated T2I models and 10 unified multimodal models) using 1,000 structured prompts spanning 25 subdomains, our findings reveal significant limitations in their ability to effectively integrate and apply world knowledge during image generation, highlighting critical pathways for enhancing knowledge incorporation and application in next-generation T2I models. Code and data are available at PKU-YuanGroup/WISE.
Qwen-Image-Agent tops the leaderboard with 0.90
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is GPT-Image-1.5, at 0.82.
The newest model with a score here came out in January 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 0.90 Qwen-Image-Agent
- 0.88 NanoBanana-Pro
- 0.83 SenseNova-U1-A3B-MoT
- 0.82 GPT-Image-1.5
- 0.80 Qwen-Image-2.0
- 0.79 SenseNova-U1-8B-MoT
- 0.63
BAGEL
- 0.57 DeepGen 1.0
- 0.56 FLUX.2 [dev]
- 0.51
Qwen-Image
- 0.50
Qwen-Image (2512)
- 0.45 Z-Image
- 0.44 FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
- 0.43
HunyuanImage 3.0
- 0.43 Uniworld_V1
- 0.42 FLUX.1 [dev]
- 0.40 SD-3.5-large
- 0.40 FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
- 0.39 SD-3-medium
- 0.38 SD-3.5-medium
- 0.36 FLUX.1-schnell
- 0.36 SD-XL-0.9
- 0.33
Janus-Pro-7B
- 0.31 SD-1.5
- 0.27
Janus-1.3B
- 0.27 Janus-Pro-1B
- 1 Qwen-Image-Agent WISE_Verified 0.90
- 2 NanoBanana-Pro WISE_Verified 0.88
- 3 SenseNova-U1-A3B-MoT WISE_Verified; CoT 0.83
- 4 GPT-Image-1.5 WISE_Verified 0.82
- 5 Qwen-Image-2.0 WISE_Verified 0.80
- 6 SenseNova-U1-8B-MoT WISE_Verified; CoT 0.79
- 7
BAGEL WISE_Verified; CoT 0.63
- 8 DeepGen 1.0 WISE_Verified 0.57
- 9 FLUX.2 [dev] WISE_Verified 0.56
- 10
Qwen-Image WISE_Verified 0.51
- 11
Qwen-Image (2512) WISE_Verified 0.50
- 12 Z-Image WISE_Verified 0.45
- 13 FLUX.2 [klein] 9B WISE_Verified 0.44
- 14
HunyuanImage 3.0 WISE_Verified 0.43
- 15 Uniworld_V1 WISE_Verified 0.43
- 16 FLUX.1 [dev] WISE_Verified 0.42
- 17 SD-3.5-large WISE_Verified 0.40
- 18 FLUX.2 [klein] 4B WISE_Verified 0.40
- 19 SD-3-medium WISE_Verified 0.39
- 20 SD-3.5-medium WISE_Verified 0.38
- 21 FLUX.1-schnell WISE_Verified 0.36
- 22 SD-XL-0.9 WISE_Verified 0.36
- 23
Janus-Pro-7B WISE_Verified 0.33
- 24 SD-1.5 WISE_Verified 0.31
- 25
Janus-1.3B WISE_Verified 0.27
- 26 Janus-Pro-1B WISE_Verified 0.27
Source: Official WISE Verified leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qwen-Image-Agent | 0.90 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | NanoBanana-Pro | 0.88 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | SenseNova-U1-A3B-MoT | 0.83 | WISE_Verified; CoT | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | GPT-Image-1.5 | 0.82 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | Qwen-Image-2.0 | 0.80 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | SenseNova-U1-8B-MoT | 0.79 | WISE_Verified; CoT | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 0.63 | WISE_Verified; CoT | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | DeepGen 1.0 | 0.57 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | FLUX.2 [dev] | 0.56 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | | 0.51 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | | 0.50 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | Z-Image | 0.45 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | FLUX.2 [klein] 9B | 0.44 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | | 0.43 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | Uniworld_V1 | 0.43 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | FLUX.1 [dev] | 0.42 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | SD-3.5-large | 0.40 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | FLUX.2 [klein] 4B | 0.40 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | SD-3-medium | 0.39 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | SD-3.5-medium | 0.38 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | FLUX.1-schnell | 0.36 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | SD-XL-0.9 | 0.36 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | | 0.33 | WISE_Verified | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 24 | SD-1.5 | 0.31 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 25 | | 0.27 | WISE_Verified | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 26 | Janus-Pro-1B | 0.27 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard |
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official WISE Verified leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
Versions
More in Vision
- MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
- MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
- CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
- MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
- ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance.
Command A Vision 90.9%