Benchmark Almanac

WISE Verified

Qwen-Image-Agent 0.90 tops its leaderboard GPT-Image-1.5 0.82 leads the models we track
Not in model cards

Models generate images from the revised WISE prompts. The verified evaluation changes about 200 prompts and the judge, so original scores remain separate.

Models generate images from the revised WISE prompts. The verified evaluation changes about 200 prompts and the judge, so original scores remain separate.

Released
April 2026
Kind
Image generation and editing
Level
School
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
All public
Last model added
January 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Text-to-Image (T2I) models are capable of generating high-quality artistic creations and visual content. However, existing research and evaluation standards predominantly focus on image realism and shallow text-image alignment, lacking a comprehensive assessment of complex semantic understanding and world knowledge integration in text-to-image generation. To address this challenge, we propose WISE, the first benchmark specifically designed for World Knowledge-Informed Semantic Evaluation. WISE moves beyond simple word-pixel mapping by challenging models with 1000 meticulously crafted prompts across 25 subdomains in cultural common sense, spatio-temporal reasoning, and natural science. To overcome the limitations of traditional CLIP metric, we introduce WiScore, a novel quantitative metric for assessing knowledge-image alignment. Through comprehensive testing of 20 models (10 dedicated T2I models and 10 unified multimodal models) using 1,000 structured prompts spanning 25 subdomains, our findings reveal significant limitations in their ability to effectively integrate and apply world knowledge during image generation, highlighting critical pathways for enhancing knowledge incorporation and application in next-generation T2I models. Code and data are available at PKU-YuanGroup/WISE.

Abstract of WISE: A World Knowledge-Informed Semantic Evaluation for Text-to-Image Generation (arXiv:2503.07265, CC0)
26
Entries on its own leaderboard, 11 models we track

Qwen-Image-Agent tops the leaderboard with 0.90

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is GPT-Image-1.5, at 0.82.

The newest model with a score here came out in January 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Qwen-Image-Agent WISE_Verified 0.90
  2. 2 NanoBanana-Pro WISE_Verified 0.88
  3. 3 SenseNova-U1-A3B-MoT WISE_Verified; CoT 0.83
  4. 4 GPT-Image-1.5 WISE_Verified 0.82
  5. 5 Qwen-Image-2.0 WISE_Verified 0.80
  6. 6 SenseNova-U1-8B-MoT WISE_Verified; CoT 0.79
  7. 7 BAGEL WISE_Verified; CoT 0.63
  8. 8 DeepGen 1.0 WISE_Verified 0.57
  9. 9 FLUX.2 [dev] WISE_Verified 0.56
  10. 10 Qwen-Image WISE_Verified 0.51
  11. 11 Qwen-Image (2512) WISE_Verified 0.50
  12. 12 Z-Image WISE_Verified 0.45
  13. 13 FLUX.2 [klein] 9B WISE_Verified 0.44
  14. 14 HunyuanImage 3.0 WISE_Verified 0.43
  15. 15 Uniworld_V1 WISE_Verified 0.43
  16. 16 FLUX.1 [dev] WISE_Verified 0.42
  17. 17 SD-3.5-large WISE_Verified 0.40
  18. 18 FLUX.2 [klein] 4B WISE_Verified 0.40
  19. 19 SD-3-medium WISE_Verified 0.39
  20. 20 SD-3.5-medium WISE_Verified 0.38
  21. 21 FLUX.1-schnell WISE_Verified 0.36
  22. 22 SD-XL-0.9 WISE_Verified 0.36
  23. 23 Janus-Pro-7B WISE_Verified 0.33
  24. 24 SD-1.5 WISE_Verified 0.31
  25. 25 Janus-1.3B WISE_Verified 0.27
  26. 26 Janus-Pro-1B WISE_Verified 0.27

Source: Official WISE Verified leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen-Image-Agent 0.90 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
2 NanoBanana-Pro 0.88 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
3 SenseNova-U1-A3B-MoT 0.83 WISE_Verified; CoT Official leaderboard
4 GPT-Image-1.5 0.82 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
5 Qwen-Image-2.0 0.80 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
6 SenseNova-U1-8B-MoT 0.79 WISE_Verified; CoT Official leaderboard
7 BAGEL 0.63 WISE_Verified; CoT Official leaderboard
8 DeepGen 1.0 0.57 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
9 FLUX.2 [dev] 0.56 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
10 Qwen-Image 0.51 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
11 Qwen-Image (2512) 0.50 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
12 Z-Image 0.45 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
13 FLUX.2 [klein] 9B 0.44 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
14 HunyuanImage 3.0 0.43 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
15 Uniworld_V1 0.43 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
16 FLUX.1 [dev] 0.42 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
17 SD-3.5-large 0.40 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
18 FLUX.2 [klein] 4B 0.40 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
19 SD-3-medium 0.39 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
20 SD-3.5-medium 0.38 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
21 FLUX.1-schnell 0.36 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
22 SD-XL-0.9 0.36 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
23 Janus-Pro-7B 0.33 WISE_Verified Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
24 SD-1.5 0.31 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
25 Janus-1.3B 0.27 WISE_Verified Oct 2024 Official leaderboard
26 Janus-Pro-1B 0.27 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard
0.28 0.30 0.32 0.34 2025 0.28 0.30 0.32 0.34 2025

Source: Official WISE Verified leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

Versions

More in Vision

All 281 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%