Benchmark Almanac

WebHarbor

GPT-6 Astra 86.7% leads since September 2026
Not in model cards

Agents navigate local copies of 153 websites to search, sign in, book services, and change stored state. The suite contains 3,518 tasks, including 306 verified test tasks and 2,288 training tasks. The test score measures the percentage of tasks passed by scripted verifiers.

AIMING Lab released the first 15 environments in May 2026 and the full suite in November 2026. Agents use either a GUI harness or OpenCode on the same test set. Independent judge scores and verifier agreement remain diagnostics. Live-web transfer results measure other benchmarks.

Made by
AIMING Lab
Released
May 2026
Kind
Web browsing
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
GPT-6 Astra #3 on the capability index
Last model added
September 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

GUI web agents require realistic and interactive environments that remain stable during both evaluation and training. Live website evaluation suffers from changing content, access restrictions, and limited coverage of authenticated workflows, while existing synthetic environments for training often lack functional depth and visual fidelity. We propose WebHarbor, a suite of 153 executable and dockerized website environments that faithfully reconstruct the visual interfaces, content, and functional workflows of real-world web services under deterministic control. We build WebHarbor through task-driven human-agent collaboration, where environments evolve as new tasks expand their functional scope, coding agents implement the required changes, and human contributors audit visual fidelity, functional correctness, and task validity. The resulting suite comprises 3,518 tasks spanning multi-step and post-authentication workflows, where existing works often fail to cover. Beyond reliable evaluation, WebHarbor provides high-fidelity synthetic web environments for cost-efficient reinforcement learning (RL). We demonstrate that a Qwen 4B-level GUI agent trained with RL in WebHarbor generalizes to unseen tasks and performs competitively with leading open-source GUI web agents across four benchmarks. The code and data are publicly available at https://github.com/aiming-lab/WebHarbor.

Abstract of WebHarbor: Docking Real Websites for Evolving GUI Agent Environments (arXiv:2611.03634, CC0)
8
Entries on its own leaderboard, 4 models we track

GPT-6 Astra leads with 86.7% among models released by September 2026

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

The newest model with a score here came out in September 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 GPT-6 Astra 86.7%
  2. 2 GPT-5.5 79.7%
  3. 3 Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 57.4%
  4. 4 WebHarbor-4B 30%
  5. 5 OpenWebRL-4B-SFT 29.1%
  6. 6 GPT-4.1 26.4%
  7. 7 OpenWebRL-4B 19.7%
  8. 8 Qwen3-VL-4B (base) 19.7%

Source: Official WebHarbor leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-6 Astra 86.7% GUI Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
2 GPT-5.5 79.7% OpenCode Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
3 Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 57.4% OpenCode Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
4 WebHarbor-4B 30% GUI Official leaderboard
5 OpenWebRL-4B-SFT 29.1% GUI Official leaderboard
6 GPT-4.1 26.4% GUI Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
7 OpenWebRL-4B 19.7% GUI Official leaderboard
8 Qwen3-VL-4B (base) 19.7% GUI Official leaderboard

2 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in May 2026

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI
Own leaderboard Passed 85% in Sep 2026, by GPT-6 Astra
GPT-6 Astra 86.7%

Source: Official WebHarbor leaderboard

GPT-6 Astra on the official leaderboard passed 85% in September 2026

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-6 Astra GPT-5.5 Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B GPT-4.1 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-6 Astra GPT-5.5

Source: Official WebHarbor leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Computer and browser use

All 69 in Computer and browser use
  • BrowseComp In use Hard-to-find facts that need persistent web browsing. Short verifiable answers graded for exact correctness. Claude Fable 5 93.3%
  • ScreenSpot-Pro In use GUI grounding on high-resolution professional-software screenshots. The model must locate the target UI element. GPT-6 Astra 92.7%
  • AndroidWorld In use Agents complete 116 tasks across 20 real Android apps in an emulator. Each task checks the device's system state to judge success. GPT-6 Astra 100%
  • OSWorld 2.1 In use Agents complete 108 long-horizon workflows across 31 self-hosted websites and desktop apps, averaging 318 tool calls. Scored by binary completion and checkpoint partial credit. Claude Opus 5.5 81.8%
  • WebArena-Verified In use Agents complete 812 audited WebArena tasks on self-hosted websites. Deterministic evaluators check the agent's answer and captured network traces. Muse Spark 1.1 69%
  • MobileWorld In use Agents complete 201 tasks across 20 mobile apps, including tasks that need user clarification or MCP tools. Backend checks verify success. GPT-5 55.3%